Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings If Grievance Is Real But Lies Before Different Forum, Plaint Should Be Returned Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, Not Rejected: Rajasthan High Court Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Severity Of Economic Offence If Evidence Is Documentary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Non-Compliance With Mandatory Duty To Inform Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Is Impermissible: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Land Acquisition Award Finality Under Section 12 Is A Bar To Writ Petitions Challenging 'Public Necessity': Madhya Pradesh High Court State As Eminent Domain Is Obligated To Pay Adequate Compensation, Not Minimum To Suit Its Convenience: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Grants Emergency Parole To Life Convict To Execute Sale Deed, Repay Bank Loan To Prevent Family's Eviction High Court Cannot Act As Court Of First Instance In Service Matters Amenable To CAT Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Election Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction To Declare Caste Certificate Forged, Authority Vests Solely With Scrutiny Committee: Allahabad High Court Order IX Rule 7 CPC Requires 'Good Cause' Not 'Sufficient Cause'; Trial Court Can't Apply Higher Threshold To Pre-Decree Proceedings: Telangana High Court Victim Cannot Maintain Appeal Seeking Enhancement Of Sentence Under Section 372 CrPC; Such Power Exclusively With State: Rajasthan High Court Disability Pension: Presumption In Favour Of Personnel If Found Fit At Enrollment; Percentage Must Be Rounded Off: Punjab & Haryana HC Employee Entitled To Second Kramonnati Benefit If Promotion To Higher Post Does Not Result In Higher Pay Scale: Madhya Pradesh High Court Borrowers Can Be Granted Opportunity To Clear Loan Overdues In Installments To Prevent Coercive Action Under SARFAESI Act: Kerala High Court

No Legitimate Expectation Beyond Merit List of 50: Delhi High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision on Army Permanent Commission

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court delivered a significant judgment on February 08, 2024, concerning the grant of Permanent Commission in the Army. The Court upheld the decision of the Armed Forces Tribunal, which had dismissed a petition seeking Permanent Commission on the grounds of legitimate expectation beyond the top 50 candidates in the merit list.

The petitioner, a Short Service Commissioned Medical Officer, sought Permanent Commission based on the Departmental Permanent Commission (DPC) held in June 2012. His contention was based on his placement at Serial No. 53 of the merit list, arguing that unfilled vacancies from the top 50 should be filled from the waiting list. The primary issue revolved around whether candidates beyond the top 50 merit list have a legitimate expectation for Permanent Commission when vacancies remain unfilled.

The Court observed, "The applicant cannot claim the benefit of legitimate expectation as this Tribunal with regard to the same selection has dearly held that it is only the 50 most meritorious candidates who had the legitimate expectations." The assessment hinged on the interpretation of the term "legitimate expectation" and its applicability beyond the top 50 candidates.

The Court discussed the principles of legitimate expectation, citing judgments in similar cases. It emphasized that legitimate expectation does not extend beyond the specified merit list, in this case, the top 50 candidates.

The High Court dismissed the petition, aligning with the Tribunal's view that the petitioner, being 53rd in the merit list, did not fall within the scope of legitimate expectation. The Court concluded that there was no obligation on the part of the respondents to operate the waiting list beyond the top 50 candidates.

Date of Decision: February 08, 2024

Maj Vishal (Now Lt Col) vs. Union of India and Ors

 

Latest Legal News