Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

No Judgment Of A Court Can Be Allowed To Stand If It Has Been Obtained By Fraud: Kerala High Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail of Police Officer in Rape Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Kerala has cancelled the anticipatory bail previously granted to Saiju A.V., a former Station House Police Officer, accused of rape and forging documents to manipulate judicial proceedings. Justice Gopinath P., presiding over the matter, underscored the gravity of the misuse of judicial processes and the submission of forged documents as grounds for the cancellation of bail.

The pivotal legal issue in this case was the alleged use of a fabricated document by the 7th respondent, Saiju A.V., to secure anticipatory bail in a series of charges, including multiple subsections of rape under IPC Section 376. The Court addressed the misuse of judicial processes and the manipulation of evidence to influence the outcome of court proceedings.

Facts of the Case: Saiju A.V. was accused of committing rape in 2019 while serving as the Station House Officer at Malayinkeezhu Police Station. Following his initial grant of anticipatory bail by the High Court, further allegations surfaced, including additional criminal activities and the creation of forged documents purportedly to influence judicial proceedings. These developments prompted a reevaluation of his bail status.

Evaluation of Anticipatory Bail: The Court scrutinized the conditions under which the anticipatory bail had been granted and whether these conditions were violated by subsequent actions of the accused.

Misuse of Judicial Processes: The detailed examination of the forged document that Saiju presented revealed a calculated attempt to mislead the court, which significantly influenced the decision to initially grant bail.

Forensic Evidence: The analysis of digital evidence and testimonies around the forged document showed that it was created prior to the events it described, proving it was fabricated to mislead the judicial process.

Reliance on Supreme Court Judgments: Justice Gopinath cited several precedents where bail was cancelled due to the misuse of liberty by the accused, stressing the importance of maintaining judicial integrity.

The anticipatory bail previously granted to Saiju was cancelled based on his misuse of the liberty and engagement in further alleged crimes. The court ordered his immediate arrest and highlighted the severe consequences of using forged documents in judicial processes.

 Date of Decision: April 15, 2024

Saiju A.V. v. State of Kerala

 

Latest Legal News