Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

No Judgment Of A Court Can Be Allowed To Stand If It Has Been Obtained By Fraud: Kerala High Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail of Police Officer in Rape Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Kerala has cancelled the anticipatory bail previously granted to Saiju A.V., a former Station House Police Officer, accused of rape and forging documents to manipulate judicial proceedings. Justice Gopinath P., presiding over the matter, underscored the gravity of the misuse of judicial processes and the submission of forged documents as grounds for the cancellation of bail.

The pivotal legal issue in this case was the alleged use of a fabricated document by the 7th respondent, Saiju A.V., to secure anticipatory bail in a series of charges, including multiple subsections of rape under IPC Section 376. The Court addressed the misuse of judicial processes and the manipulation of evidence to influence the outcome of court proceedings.

Facts of the Case: Saiju A.V. was accused of committing rape in 2019 while serving as the Station House Officer at Malayinkeezhu Police Station. Following his initial grant of anticipatory bail by the High Court, further allegations surfaced, including additional criminal activities and the creation of forged documents purportedly to influence judicial proceedings. These developments prompted a reevaluation of his bail status.

Evaluation of Anticipatory Bail: The Court scrutinized the conditions under which the anticipatory bail had been granted and whether these conditions were violated by subsequent actions of the accused.

Misuse of Judicial Processes: The detailed examination of the forged document that Saiju presented revealed a calculated attempt to mislead the court, which significantly influenced the decision to initially grant bail.

Forensic Evidence: The analysis of digital evidence and testimonies around the forged document showed that it was created prior to the events it described, proving it was fabricated to mislead the judicial process.

Reliance on Supreme Court Judgments: Justice Gopinath cited several precedents where bail was cancelled due to the misuse of liberty by the accused, stressing the importance of maintaining judicial integrity.

The anticipatory bail previously granted to Saiju was cancelled based on his misuse of the liberty and engagement in further alleged crimes. The court ordered his immediate arrest and highlighted the severe consequences of using forged documents in judicial processes.

 Date of Decision: April 15, 2024

Saiju A.V. v. State of Kerala

 

Similar News