Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix, If Credible, Is Enough to Convict: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Cheque Issued as Security Still Attracts Section 138 NI Act If Liability Exists on Date of Presentation: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity Law of Limitation Binds All Equally, Including the State: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Review Petition with 5743 Days’ Delay Once Selected, All Are Equals: Allahabad High Court Slams State for Withholding Pay Protection From Later Batches of Ex-Servicemen Constables Non-Compliance With Section 42 of NDPS Act Is Fatal to Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court Acquits Two Accused In 160 Kg Poppy Husk Case Unregistered Agreement Creating Right of Way Inadmissible in Evidence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Summary Decree in Partition Suit Denied: Unequivocal Admissions Absent, Full Trial Necessary: Delhi High Court No Court Can Allow Itself to Be Used as an Instrument of Fraud: Delhi High Court Exposes Forged Writ Petition Filed in Name of Unaware Citizen "Deliberate Wage Splitting to Evade Provident Fund Dues Is Illegal": Bombay High Court Restores PF Authority's 7A Order Against Saket College and Centrum Direct Anti-Suit Injunction in Matrimonial Dispute Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Stall UK Divorce Proceedings Filed by Wife

No Jail for Guntur Municipal Commissioner: AP High Court Allows Rent-Tax Adjustment in Contempt Case

05 October 2024 3:50 PM

By: sayum


Andhra Pradesh High Court overturned a contempt conviction against the Commissioner of the Guntur Municipal Corporation (GMC), originally imposed for failure to comply with a court order regarding rent payments for a school building. The High Court set aside the contempt order, giving the Municipal Corporation six weeks to resolve the outstanding rent issue, either by adjusting it against tax dues or by paying in cash. The ruling provided a pathway for the GMC to avoid further contempt proceedings if the dispute remained unresolved.

The issue arose from a dispute over rent payments for a municipal high school operated by the GMC on land owned by a private trust (Satram). The original case, filed by the Satram, alleged that the GMC had not paid rent for the land. On April 12, 2022, a single-judge bench of the High Court ordered the GMC to pay ₹25,01,400 in back rent and to calculate future rent at ₹2 per square foot, correcting an earlier error that had calculated rent at ₹2 per square yard.

Despite partial payment, the trust claimed that the GMC had not fully complied with the revised court order, leading to a contempt petition.

In December 2023, the Single Judge ruled that the GMC had violated the court's earlier order by calculating rent based on the incorrect square yard rate and not paying the full amount owed under the ₹2 per square foot calculation. The Commissioner of the GMC was convicted of contempt of court and sentenced to one month of simple imprisonment, along with a fine of ₹2,000.

On appeal, the GMC argued that it had made the payments based on an earlier calculation agreed upon in communications with the Endowments Department. The GMC also contended that the Satram owed the Municipal Corporation over ₹63 lakh in municipal taxes, which it sought to offset against the rent due. The Corporation insisted that this approach was a reasonable attempt to conserve public funds, as the rents would be adjusted against the outstanding taxes.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that the Single Judge had not fully considered the GMC's argument regarding the adjustment of the rent against tax dues. The Court concluded that, while the GMC had not yet fully complied with the court order, the attempt to settle the dues by adjusting taxes was reasonable and did not amount to wilful disobedience of the court's directives.

However, the High Court emphasized that the GMC could not indefinitely delay compliance. The court gave the GMC six weeks to either finalize the adjustment of rents or make the necessary payments in cash. Failure to do so would allow the Satram to file fresh contempt proceedings against the Municipal Corporation.

The contempt appeal was allowed, and the one-month prison sentence and fine imposed on the GMC Commissioner were set aside. The court granted the GMC time to resolve the dispute, warning that further contempt proceedings could be initiated if the issue remained unresolved after six weeks.

Date of Decision: October 3, 2024

Smt. Kirthi Chekuri v. Kappagantu Jankiram Sarma & Ors.

Latest Legal News