'Clever Drafting' Cannot Resurrect Time-Barred Suits: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Vexatious Plaint No Absolute Right To Choose Route For Religious Procession: Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea Against Police Restriction Acquittal In Section 498A IPC Case Does Not Bar Proceedings Under Domestic Violence Act: Chhattisgarh High Court Calcutta High Court Refuses To Allow Amendment Introducing 'Date Of Knowledge' In Tenancy Dispute Allahabad High Court Rejects 'Attempt To Murder' Charge Citing Absence Of Grievous Injury And Fundamental Prosecution Flaws Uttarakhand High Court Quashes Temporary Acquisition Of Private Helipad, Orders Restoration Of Possession End Of IP Court Shopping?': Delhi High Court Refers Conflict On Territorial Jurisdiction To Larger Bench MACT Cannot Adjudicate Personal Accident; Deceased Tortfeasor's Heirs Cannot Claim From Own Insurer For His Wrong: Gujarat High Court Do Not Shut Doors To Litigants: J&K&L High Court Sets Aside Rejection Of Plaint, Rules Summary Suit Can Be Converted To Regular Recovery Suit Cannot Expect A Spouse To Endure This Forever: Karnataka High Court Upholds Divorce, Defines Limits Of 'Ordinary Wear And Tear' In Marriage Custodial Interrogation Unnecessary': Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail In ₹9 Crore Cheating Case As Accused Complied With Sharjah Decree Cannot Arbitrarily Value Damages: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rules Plaintiff Must Pay Ad Valorem Court Fee On Specific Claims Remarriage Of Widow Does Not Disinherit Daughter: Madras High Court 'Fatal Flaw' In Specific Performance Suits: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Plea For Failing To Plead 'Readiness And Willingness' Section 125 CrPC  | Wife's Convenience Must Be Looked At In Matrimonial Disputes: Orissa High Court Rejects Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rejects State's Plea Against Demolition Of Unauthorized Bus Stand Wall

"No Grounds for Arrest; Anticipatory Bail Granted in NDPS Case ," States High Court of Punjab and Haryana

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, July 28, 2023 - In a landmark ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to Pushpinder Kumar alias Pushpinder Singh alias Tinku. The case had been filed under Sections 15, 18, 20, 21, and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajbir Sehrawat, presiding over the case, stated, "In view of the above, it can safely be construed that there is nothing to support the case of the prosecution, even as per the assertions of the police. As such, the petitioner deserves to be protected against his arrest."

The court allowed the petition on grounds of no substantial evidence against the petitioner. It ruled that the petitioner, if arrested, must be released on bail, provided he furnishes personal bonds/surety, and complies with the investigation as and when required, in accordance with Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The case had been lodged at the Police Station City Hoshiarpur, District Hoshiarpur. The petitioner's counsel had argued that the case was fabricated and registered with a mala fide intention. The prosecution had no evidence to support its case, leading to this decision by the court.

Furthermore, the person who lodged the FIR without any substantial basis has been ordered to pay compensation of Rs.10,000 to the petitioner. "Since the FIR has been got registered even before creating a basis for that, and due to the FIR, the petitioner has been put to the harassment and expenses," the judge noted in his order.

Date of Decision: 26th July 2023

Pushpinder Kumar vs   State of Punjab   

Latest Legal News