Granting Bail Does Not Shield Foreign Nationals from Executive Action on Visa Violations: Delhi High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Misused to Resolve Substantive Disputes or Replace Execution Mechanisms: P&H High Court Eviction Proceedings Must Follow Principles of Natural Justice: Telangana High Court Quashes Eviction Order under Senior Citizens Act Limitation Law | Sufficient Cause Cannot Be Liberally Interpreted If Negligence or Inaction Is Apparent: Gujarat High Court Mere Pendency of Lease Renewal Requests Does Not Constitute Bona Fide Dispute: Calcutta High Court Upholds Eviction Proceedings Under Public Premises Act CGST | Declaratory Nature of Safari Retreats Ruling Mandates Reassessment of Input Tax Credit Claims: Kerala High Court Changing Rules of the Game Mid-Way Violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution: Rajasthan High Court Disapproval of a Relationship Does Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide Without Direct Instigation or Mens Rea: Supreme Court Limitation Period Under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act Cannot Defeat Victim’s Right to Compensation: Gujarat High Court Maintenance To Wife Cannot Be a Precondition for Bail: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 438 CrPC Court Cannot Rewrite Contract When Vendor Lacks Ownership of the Property: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance Royalty Can Be Levied on Minor Minerals Like Brick Earth, Irrespective of Land Ownership: Supreme Court Bail in Heinous Crimes Must Be Granted with Adequate Reasons and Judicial Scrutiny: Supreme Court Judicial Review in Disciplinary Cases Is Limited to Fairness, Not Reappreciation of Evidence: Supreme Court Prolonged Consensual Relationship Cannot Be Criminalized as Rape on False Promise of Marriage: Madras High Court No Interference in Judgments Without Perversity or Legal Error Under Section 100 CPC: Andhra Pradesh HC

"No Grounds for Arrest; Anticipatory Bail Granted in NDPS Case ," States High Court of Punjab and Haryana

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, July 28, 2023 - In a landmark ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to Pushpinder Kumar alias Pushpinder Singh alias Tinku. The case had been filed under Sections 15, 18, 20, 21, and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajbir Sehrawat, presiding over the case, stated, "In view of the above, it can safely be construed that there is nothing to support the case of the prosecution, even as per the assertions of the police. As such, the petitioner deserves to be protected against his arrest."

The court allowed the petition on grounds of no substantial evidence against the petitioner. It ruled that the petitioner, if arrested, must be released on bail, provided he furnishes personal bonds/surety, and complies with the investigation as and when required, in accordance with Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The case had been lodged at the Police Station City Hoshiarpur, District Hoshiarpur. The petitioner's counsel had argued that the case was fabricated and registered with a mala fide intention. The prosecution had no evidence to support its case, leading to this decision by the court.

Furthermore, the person who lodged the FIR without any substantial basis has been ordered to pay compensation of Rs.10,000 to the petitioner. "Since the FIR has been got registered even before creating a basis for that, and due to the FIR, the petitioner has been put to the harassment and expenses," the judge noted in his order.

Date of Decision: 26th July 2023

Pushpinder Kumar vs   State of Punjab   

Similar News