TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

No Evidence to Demonstrate Bias or Lack of Credibility in Police Investigation: Delhi HC Dismisses Plea for Re-investigation in Shahdara Quintuple Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking re-investigation of a high-profile quintuple murder in Shahdara, Delhi. The case titled ‘Krishna vs. Delhi Police & Ors’ was pronounced by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma on April 4, 2024.

 

The petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., raised questions about the alleged wrongful implication of the petitioner’s family members in a quintuple murder case due to media pressure on the Delhi Police. The petitioner sought transfer of the case to the CBI or an independent agency, citing lapses in the police investigation.

 

Initially, the FIR was lodged against unknown persons under Section 302 of the IPC, but the petitioner’s son and son-in-law were later arrested. The petitioner contested the investigation, highlighting issues such as delay in FIR registration, failure to examine local witnesses, and overlooking the property dispute angle. She also questioned the probability of her family members committing the crime.

The Court observed that no substantial evidence was presented to demonstrate any bias or lack of credibility in the police investigation. It was noted that scientific evidence like DNA profiling implicated the petitioner’s son and son-in-law in the crime. The property dispute angle, explored by the police, was found unsubstantiated.

The Court also made a distinction between an inquiry under Section 174 and an investigation under Section 154 of the Cr.P.C. It ruled that the FIR’s registration and the investigative process were in order as per legal requirements.

Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal for re-investigation, citing no substantial ground to doubt the credibility or impartiality of the police investigation. The Court emphasized that the scientific evidence and investigation findings are pending evaluation by the trial court. The petition and pending applications were accordingly disposed of.

Date of Decision: April 4, 2024

Krishna vs. Delhi Police & Ors

Latest Legal News