District Judiciary Retirement Age | Supreme Court Directs Enhancement To 62 Years To Arrest Attrition Of Judicial Talent Slogans Inciting Armed Rebellion Or Challenging Sovereignty Cannot Be Equated With Religious Expressions: Allahabad High Court Denies Bail Revisional Authority Under AP ROR Act Has Jurisdiction To Direct Inquiry Into Illegal Transfers Of Assigned Land: Andhra Pradesh High Court Indian Law Does Not Recognise 'Joint Parenting' As A Statutory Concept; Child Welfare Remains Paramount: Bombay High Court Order 26 Rule 9 CPC | Court Must Appoint Survey-Knowing Commissioner In Suits Alleging Physical Encroachment And Boundary Disputes: Calcutta High Court Section 33-C(2) ID Act | Labour Court Has Jurisdiction To Recover Consequential Benefits Arising From CAT Orders: Delhi High Court Order VIII Rule 1-A(3) CPC | Procedural Law Is Meant For Advancement Of Justice; Technicalities Should Not Scuttle Opportunity To Lead Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court High Court Can Condition Condonation Of Delay In Land Acquisition Appeals Upon Waiver Of Interest For Delayed Period: Bombay High Court Employees Compensation Act | Insurance Company Not Liable To Indemnify Penalty Imposed On Employer Under Section 4-A(3)(b): Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees’ Compensation Act | Failure To Frame Issue On Employer-Employee Relationship Vitiates Commissioner’s Award: Kerala High Court Default Bail Under Section 187 BNSS | Period Of Investigation Depends On Substance Of Allegations In FIR, Not Merely Mentioned Sections: Madhya Pradesh High Court SARFAESI Act | Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Must Be Challenged Under Section 17 Before DRT, Not Via Writ Petition: Kerala High Court

No Evidence to Demonstrate Bias or Lack of Credibility in Police Investigation: Delhi HC Dismisses Plea for Re-investigation in Shahdara Quintuple Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking re-investigation of a high-profile quintuple murder in Shahdara, Delhi. The case titled ‘Krishna vs. Delhi Police & Ors’ was pronounced by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma on April 4, 2024.

 

The petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., raised questions about the alleged wrongful implication of the petitioner’s family members in a quintuple murder case due to media pressure on the Delhi Police. The petitioner sought transfer of the case to the CBI or an independent agency, citing lapses in the police investigation.

 

Initially, the FIR was lodged against unknown persons under Section 302 of the IPC, but the petitioner’s son and son-in-law were later arrested. The petitioner contested the investigation, highlighting issues such as delay in FIR registration, failure to examine local witnesses, and overlooking the property dispute angle. She also questioned the probability of her family members committing the crime.

The Court observed that no substantial evidence was presented to demonstrate any bias or lack of credibility in the police investigation. It was noted that scientific evidence like DNA profiling implicated the petitioner’s son and son-in-law in the crime. The property dispute angle, explored by the police, was found unsubstantiated.

The Court also made a distinction between an inquiry under Section 174 and an investigation under Section 154 of the Cr.P.C. It ruled that the FIR’s registration and the investigative process were in order as per legal requirements.

Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal for re-investigation, citing no substantial ground to doubt the credibility or impartiality of the police investigation. The Court emphasized that the scientific evidence and investigation findings are pending evaluation by the trial court. The petition and pending applications were accordingly disposed of.

Date of Decision: April 4, 2024

Krishna vs. Delhi Police & Ors

Latest Legal News