Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

No Evidence of Petitioner’s Involvement, Further Proceedings Would Be an Abuse of Court Process  – Calcutta High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Bona Fide Purchaser

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement today, the High Court of Calcutta quashed the criminal proceedings against Tushar Manna, in a case concerning the alleged fraudulent sale of property. Justice Bibhas Ranjan De ruled that proceeding further against Manna, who was deemed a bona fide purchaser of the property in question, would constitute an abuse of court process.

The court examined the revision application against the criminal proceedings initiated under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), namely Sections 403, 406, 420, 120B, 34, related to accusations of a fraudulent property transaction. The petitioner sought quashing of these proceedings, asserting his status as a bona fide purchaser unaware of the prior fraudulent activities allegedly conducted by the previous owners.

The case originated from a FIR lodged at Jangipara Police Station on November 1, 2015, following a complaint by the second respondent. The complaint detailed that after receiving an advance payment and entering an agreement for sale, the original property owners, along with the petitioner, sold the property to Manna, thus perpetrating the alleged fraud.

Ownership and Knowledge: Justice De noted that Tushar Manna purchased the property via a registered sale deed dated July 20, 2015, without knowledge of any prior agreement or alleged fraudulent activities involving the previous owners.

Settlement Evidence: The court considered the fact that the previous owners had settled the disputed amount with interest to the complainant as observed during their anticipatory bail, further diluting any claims against Manna.

Lack of Involvement: The prosecution failed to demonstrate any direct involvement or knowledge of Manna in the fraud, with no evidence of him receiving funds or communicating deceitfully with the complainant.

Legal Scrutiny: Upon scrutinizing the complaint and relevant legal provisions, the court found no substantial evidence implicating Manna directly or indirectly in the fraud, thereby warranting the quashing of proceedings against him to prevent misuse of the judicial process.

Decision: Concluding the arguments, Justice De ruled that no prima facie case against Manna was established, leading to the quashing of all proceedings against him. The judgement emphasized that continuing the case would represent an unjust misuse of legal resources and an unwarranted harassment to the petitioner.

Date of Decision: May 10, 2024.

Tushar Manna vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr.

Similar News