Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |     Punjab & Haryana HC Double Bench Upholds Protection for Married Partners in Live-In Relationships, Denies Same for Minors    |    

No Evidence of Abetment or Instigation: MP High Court Quashes FIR Against School Authorities in Student Suicide Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, presided over by Justice Anand Pathak, has quashed the FIR and subsequent proceedings against the school authorities of Vivekanand School in the case involving the suicide of a student. The judgment, delivered on January 24, 2024, in the Misc. Criminal Case No. 10745 of 2023, underlined the absence of evidence for abetment or instigation by the school authorities in the student’s tragic decision to end his life.

The case, titled Virendra Singh Rana & Ors. V. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr., revolved around the FIR lodged against the school’s principal and other staff, accusing them of abetting the suicide of a student following disciplinary action. The court observed, “In the present case, allegations against the petitioners are that they scolded and reprimanded the deceased in such a manner where he committed suicide. As per CCTV footage...it is obvious that Principal must have reprimanded them for their conduct and had to initiate all possible steps for course correction.”

The court delved deeply into the sociological aspect of social control in educational institutions, discussing various informal social controls such as shaming, praising, and gossiping. Justice Pathak noted, “children are required to be tutored not only to be good in academics but they ought to be tutored to become a good citizen so that they may add to the assets of the society rather than becoming liability.”

Significantly, the court exercised its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to prevent the abuse of process and miscarriage of justice, citing the Supreme Court’s guidelines in State of Haryana v. Ch. Bhajan Lal & Ors., AIR 1992 SC 604. The FIR at Crime No.371/2022 and all consequential proceedings were quashed, discharging the petitioners from all allegations.

Date of Decision: 24th January 2024

VIRENDRA SINGH RANA & ORS. VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.

 

Similar News