Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Permissive Use Cannot Ripen into Right of Prescriptive Easement: Kerala High Court High Court Slams Procedural Delays, Orders FSL Report in Assault Case to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

No Evidence of Abetment or Instigation: MP High Court Quashes FIR Against School Authorities in Student Suicide Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, presided over by Justice Anand Pathak, has quashed the FIR and subsequent proceedings against the school authorities of Vivekanand School in the case involving the suicide of a student. The judgment, delivered on January 24, 2024, in the Misc. Criminal Case No. 10745 of 2023, underlined the absence of evidence for abetment or instigation by the school authorities in the student’s tragic decision to end his life.

The case, titled Virendra Singh Rana & Ors. V. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr., revolved around the FIR lodged against the school’s principal and other staff, accusing them of abetting the suicide of a student following disciplinary action. The court observed, “In the present case, allegations against the petitioners are that they scolded and reprimanded the deceased in such a manner where he committed suicide. As per CCTV footage...it is obvious that Principal must have reprimanded them for their conduct and had to initiate all possible steps for course correction.”

The court delved deeply into the sociological aspect of social control in educational institutions, discussing various informal social controls such as shaming, praising, and gossiping. Justice Pathak noted, “children are required to be tutored not only to be good in academics but they ought to be tutored to become a good citizen so that they may add to the assets of the society rather than becoming liability.”

Significantly, the court exercised its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to prevent the abuse of process and miscarriage of justice, citing the Supreme Court’s guidelines in State of Haryana v. Ch. Bhajan Lal & Ors., AIR 1992 SC 604. The FIR at Crime No.371/2022 and all consequential proceedings were quashed, discharging the petitioners from all allegations.

Date of Decision: 24th January 2024

VIRENDRA SINGH RANA & ORS. VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.

 

Similar News