Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

No Bar on Levying Sales Tax on Silk Sarees: Supreme Court Upholds Delhi Government's Stance"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of India, the appeal of 'Saree Sansar' against the Delhi Government's sales tax imposition on silk sarees was dismissed. The case, presided over by Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol, revolved around the contention of the appellant regarding the levying of state sales tax on silk sarees, which the appellant argued was not permissible under the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 (ADE Act) and certain constitutional provisions.

The appellant, Saree Sansar, challenged an assessment order that imposed a 12% state sales tax for the period from January 15, 2000, to March 31, 2000. They argued that silk sarees, being “declared goods” under the ADE Act, should not be subject to state sales tax. Additionally, they claimed that the rate should not exceed 4% as per Section 15(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act (CST Act).

The respondents countered that since silk fabric was removed from the declared goods list under Section 14 of the CST Act in 1968, there was no restriction on levying a higher tax rate. Furthermore, they argued that the additional duty on silk sarees was nil, thus not contributing to the share of Delhi in the ADE Act proceeds, justifying the state's tax imposition.

In its assessment, the Supreme Court observed that the deletion of silk fabric from the declared goods under Section 14 of the CST Act post-May 1968 removed the cap on the sales tax rate, rendering the argument based on Section 15(1) of the CST Act inapplicable. Regarding the ADE Act, the Court noted that no additional duty was payable on silk sarees, and thus, the proviso allowed states to levy sales tax without sharing the additional duty proceeds. This, the Court found, nullified the appellant's argument against the tax imposition.

Ultimately, the Court upheld the Delhi High Court's decision, finding no error in its judgment. The appeal was dismissed with no orders as to costs.

Date of Decision: March 21, 2024

Saree Sansar vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Latest Legal News