Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

No Bar on Levying Sales Tax on Silk Sarees: Supreme Court Upholds Delhi Government's Stance"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of India, the appeal of 'Saree Sansar' against the Delhi Government's sales tax imposition on silk sarees was dismissed. The case, presided over by Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol, revolved around the contention of the appellant regarding the levying of state sales tax on silk sarees, which the appellant argued was not permissible under the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 (ADE Act) and certain constitutional provisions.

The appellant, Saree Sansar, challenged an assessment order that imposed a 12% state sales tax for the period from January 15, 2000, to March 31, 2000. They argued that silk sarees, being “declared goods” under the ADE Act, should not be subject to state sales tax. Additionally, they claimed that the rate should not exceed 4% as per Section 15(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act (CST Act).

The respondents countered that since silk fabric was removed from the declared goods list under Section 14 of the CST Act in 1968, there was no restriction on levying a higher tax rate. Furthermore, they argued that the additional duty on silk sarees was nil, thus not contributing to the share of Delhi in the ADE Act proceeds, justifying the state's tax imposition.

In its assessment, the Supreme Court observed that the deletion of silk fabric from the declared goods under Section 14 of the CST Act post-May 1968 removed the cap on the sales tax rate, rendering the argument based on Section 15(1) of the CST Act inapplicable. Regarding the ADE Act, the Court noted that no additional duty was payable on silk sarees, and thus, the proviso allowed states to levy sales tax without sharing the additional duty proceeds. This, the Court found, nullified the appellant's argument against the tax imposition.

Ultimately, the Court upheld the Delhi High Court's decision, finding no error in its judgment. The appeal was dismissed with no orders as to costs.

Date of Decision: March 21, 2024

Saree Sansar vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Latest Legal News