Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

No Appeal Against Issuance of Pattadar Passbook and Title Deed Under Section 6-A of ROR Act: Andhra High Court Sets Aside Orders of RDO and Joint Collector in Land Dispute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, in the case of Gudipudi Hanumayamma (Died) (per L.Rs.2 to 4) Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Others, allowed a Writ Appeal challenging the cancellation of pattadar passbook and title deed of the appellant by the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) and Joint Collector.

The crux of the matter involved the jurisdictional authority in the context of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (Sections 5-A, 5-B, 6-A). Specifically, whether an appeal could be maintained against the issuance of pattadar passbook and title deed under Section 6-A of the said Act.

The appellant’s contention revolved around the acquisition of land through an unregistered sale deed, later regularized under Section 5-A of the ROR Act. The Revenue Divisional Officer and Joint Collector had subsequently canceled the issued pattadar passbook and title deed on an appeal by the 5th respondent, citing allegations of forgery and fraud.

Jurisdictional Error: The Division Bench, referencing the Division Bench judgment in Ratnamma’s case, established that an appeal against the issuance of pattadar passbook and title deed under Section 6-A of the ROR Act was not maintainable.

Validity of Orders: Consequently, it was held that the orders passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer and the Joint Collector were without jurisdiction and were thus set aside.

Relief to Parties: The Court allowed the Writ Appeal, setting aside the previous order of the learned Single Judge and the impugned orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer and the Joint Collector. However, it was clarified that any findings in the present judgment were solely for disposal of this case and could not be cited in future proceedings.

Open to Future Remedies: The Court emphasized that the parties were free to seek appropriate remedies before the correct forum in accordance with the law.

The judgment underscored the procedural sanctity and the boundaries of jurisdiction in land-related disputes, particularly in the context of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act.

Date of Decision: April 4, 2024

Gudipudi Hanumayamma (Died) (per L.Rs.2 to 4) Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Others

 

Latest Legal News