Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

No Appeal Against Issuance of Pattadar Passbook and Title Deed Under Section 6-A of ROR Act: Andhra High Court Sets Aside Orders of RDO and Joint Collector in Land Dispute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, in the case of Gudipudi Hanumayamma (Died) (per L.Rs.2 to 4) Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Others, allowed a Writ Appeal challenging the cancellation of pattadar passbook and title deed of the appellant by the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) and Joint Collector.

The crux of the matter involved the jurisdictional authority in the context of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (Sections 5-A, 5-B, 6-A). Specifically, whether an appeal could be maintained against the issuance of pattadar passbook and title deed under Section 6-A of the said Act.

The appellant’s contention revolved around the acquisition of land through an unregistered sale deed, later regularized under Section 5-A of the ROR Act. The Revenue Divisional Officer and Joint Collector had subsequently canceled the issued pattadar passbook and title deed on an appeal by the 5th respondent, citing allegations of forgery and fraud.

Jurisdictional Error: The Division Bench, referencing the Division Bench judgment in Ratnamma’s case, established that an appeal against the issuance of pattadar passbook and title deed under Section 6-A of the ROR Act was not maintainable.

Validity of Orders: Consequently, it was held that the orders passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer and the Joint Collector were without jurisdiction and were thus set aside.

Relief to Parties: The Court allowed the Writ Appeal, setting aside the previous order of the learned Single Judge and the impugned orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer and the Joint Collector. However, it was clarified that any findings in the present judgment were solely for disposal of this case and could not be cited in future proceedings.

Open to Future Remedies: The Court emphasized that the parties were free to seek appropriate remedies before the correct forum in accordance with the law.

The judgment underscored the procedural sanctity and the boundaries of jurisdiction in land-related disputes, particularly in the context of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act.

Date of Decision: April 4, 2024

Gudipudi Hanumayamma (Died) (per L.Rs.2 to 4) Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Others

 

Latest Legal News