Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix, If Credible, Is Enough to Convict: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Cheque Issued as Security Still Attracts Section 138 NI Act If Liability Exists on Date of Presentation: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity Law of Limitation Binds All Equally, Including the State: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Review Petition with 5743 Days’ Delay Once Selected, All Are Equals: Allahabad High Court Slams State for Withholding Pay Protection From Later Batches of Ex-Servicemen Constables Non-Compliance With Section 42 of NDPS Act Is Fatal to Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court Acquits Two Accused In 160 Kg Poppy Husk Case Unregistered Agreement Creating Right of Way Inadmissible in Evidence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Summary Decree in Partition Suit Denied: Unequivocal Admissions Absent, Full Trial Necessary: Delhi High Court No Court Can Allow Itself to Be Used as an Instrument of Fraud: Delhi High Court Exposes Forged Writ Petition Filed in Name of Unaware Citizen "Deliberate Wage Splitting to Evade Provident Fund Dues Is Illegal": Bombay High Court Restores PF Authority's 7A Order Against Saket College and Centrum Direct Anti-Suit Injunction in Matrimonial Dispute Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Stall UK Divorce Proceedings Filed by Wife

NDPS | Heroin: A Severe Public Health Threat, Not Just a Drug: Delhi High Court Denies Bail to Foreign National

05 October 2024 3:08 PM

By: sayum


Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Francis Marion Gegg, a 71-year-old foreign national from Belize, who was caught smuggling 9.950 kg of heroin into India. The court denied the bail on the grounds that the contraband quantity was significant and thus attracted the strict provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), particularly Section 37, which imposes limitations on granting bail for commercial quantities.

On 30th October 2022, Francis Marion Gegg was intercepted at IGI Airport, New Delhi, while arriving from Doha. Customs officers searched his luggage, recovering nearly 10 kilograms of heroin hidden in his suitcase. Following the seizure, Gegg was arrested, and the substance was sent for forensic analysis, which confirmed the presence of heroin.

Gegg’s defense argued non-compliance with the procedural safeguards under Section 50 of the NDPS Act, which mandates informing the accused of their right to be searched in the presence of a Magistrate or a Gazetted Officer. Additionally, the defense highlighted discrepancies in the weight of the seized contraband and delays in sampling.

Non-Compliance with Section 50: The defense argued that Gegg was not adequately informed about his right under Section 50, thus rendering the search invalid.

Discrepancies in Weight: The defense pointed to a minor discrepancy of 9 grams in the recorded weight of the contraband, arguing that this discrepancy cast doubt on the integrity of the evidence.

Flight Risk: The prosecution argued that Gegg, being a foreign national, posed a flight risk, and the severity of the offense warranted his continued detention.

The court found that Section 50 did not apply, as the recovery was made from Gegg’s luggage and not his person. It dismissed the weight discrepancy as negligible, stating that it could be due to environmental factors such as moisture. The court also ruled that procedural lapses in the sampling did not render the case invalid.

Given the commercial quantity of heroin involved and the potential public health risks posed by the drug, the court ruled that the bail restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act applied. It found no reasonable grounds to believe that the accused was not guilty of the offense. Furthermore, the court held that the applicant’s status as a foreign national increased the likelihood of him absconding.

The bail application was dismissed, and the court directed the trial court to expedite the proceedings in light of the commercial nature of the offense.

Date of Decision: 1st October 2024

Francis Marion Gegg vs. Customs

Latest Legal News