Supreme Court Orders Fresh Investigation in Case of Alleged Property Dispute and Fraud; Transfer Petition Disposed    |     Vague Allegations of Improper Cross-Examination Insufficient for Recalling Witnesses: Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order    |     Honorable Acquittal in Criminal Proceedings Invalidates the Dismissal Based on Identical Allegations: Allahabad HC    |     Supreme Court Orders Fresh Selection for Punjab Laboratory Attendants; Eliminates Rural Area Marks    |     Entire Story of the Prosecution is a Piece of Fabrication: Supreme Court Acquits Accused in High-Profile Kidnapping Case    |     Madras High Court Overstepped in Directing Framing of Charges, Says Supreme Court; Stays Proceedings    |     Foreclosing Right to File Written Statement Without Serving Complaint Too Harsh: Supreme Court    |     Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Rash Driving Case; Compensation Reduced Due to Age and Health Factors    |     Prayers for Setting Aside Maintenance Order and Refund Not Maintainable Under Section 25(2) of Domestic Violence Act: Supreme Court    |     Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused on Grounds of Parity with Co-Accused and Prolonged Custody    |     Serious allegations of corruption demand thorough investigation Against Karnataka Bar Council Chairman:  Karnataka HC Refuses to Quash FIR    |     Probationers must be heard; a punitive action without inquiry is against natural justice: Punjab & Haryana HC Reinstates Judicial Officer    |     Refining Crude Soybean Oil is a Use of Goods Within the State, Attracting Entry Tax: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Arbitral Awards Cannot Be Overturned for Merely Better Views: Supreme Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Dismisses Appeals Over Encroachment Claims Due to Improper Demarcation Report    |     Teasing by Children Cannot Be Considered Grave and Sudden Provocation Under Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC: Gauhati High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Man Convicted of Murdering a 7-Year-Old Boy    |     ITC Blocking Under Rule 86A Cannot Exceed Available Balance in Electronic Credit Ledger: Delhi HC    |     Writ under Article 226 not maintainable when alternative remedies are available" – Delhi HC: Delhi HC Dismisses Writ Petition for FIR and Protection    |     Lack of Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Does Not Automatically Vitiate Proceedings: Calcutta HC    |     No Development Without Conveyance: Statutory Rights of Housing Society Prevail: Bombay High Court    |     Pecuniary Jurisdiction Based on Highest Valued Relief in Specific Performance Suit: Andhra Pradesh HC    |     Delay in Sale Deed Registration After Full Payment Cannot Justify Denial of Auctioned Property: Andhra Pradesh HC    |     Civil Judge Lacked Jurisdiction to Hear Suit Under Section 92 CPC; District Court is the Competent Forum: Allahabad High Court    |     Children are not only the assets of the parents but also of society: Kerala HC on Protests Involving Minors    |     A cheque issued as security does not represent a legally enforceable debt: Madras HC Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case    |    

NDPS Default Bail Granted - Chargesheet Incomplete as Not Accompanied By The FSL Report – P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted default bail to Mohammad Asif, who was implicated under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act. Justice Ashok Kumar Verma overturned the prior decision of the Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, which had dismissed the petitioner’s application for default bail.

The court observed, “an indefeasible right had vested to the petitioner immediately on the expiry of 180 days,” referring to Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) read with Section 36-A of the NDPS Act. This critical observation implies that the petitioner was entitled to default bail because the challan filed against him was incomplete as it was not accompanied by the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report.

The petitioner’s counsel argued that the absence of the FSL report rendered the challan incomplete, thereby making his client eligible for default bail after the 180-day period. The state did not dispute these facts.

The court also cited a prior judgment, Ajit Singh @ Jeeta v. State of Punjab, to emphasize the importance of an FSL report in making a challan complete. “Without which it can at best be termed to be an incomplete challan depriving the Magistrate of relevant material to take cognizance,” the judgment read.

Justice Verma ordered the release of Mohammad Asif on default bail, subject to his furnishing requisite bonds. This decision sets a crucial precedent regarding default bails in cases where the challan is incomplete.

D.D.: 23 March 2023

Mohammad Asif vs State of Haryana

Similar News