-
by Admin
07 May 2024 2:49 AM
The Delhi High Court, in a significant ruling, has dismissed appeals by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) against a judgment regarding the possession of property and a counterclaim for lease renewal under a lease agreement.
The crux of the matter was the interpretation of the lease renewal clause in a lease agreement for property at Plot A-9 and 10, South Extension, Part-1, Ring Road, New Delhi. BPCL contended that the clause implied an automatic 20-year renewal, while the respondents argued for a mutual agreement or no renewal.
The lease was originally executed in 1966 and renewed in 2003 for 20 years. Upon expiry in 2022, BPCL sought a renewal, which the respondents declined, issuing a notice to vacate. BPCL's communications in 2021 and 2022 seeking renewal were deemed unsubstantiated and considered an afterthought defense.
Interpretation of Lease Renewal Clause: The Court interpreted the clause as necessitating mutual agreement for any renewal period, rejecting BPCL’s notion of automatic renewal. The phrase "NIL years" in the clause was pivotal in this decision.
Rejection of BPCL’s Renewal Request: BPCL's alleged communications regarding lease renewal were not substantiated, leading the court to dismiss them as afterthoughts.
Specific Performance and Lease Agreement: The counterclaim for specific performance under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 was deemed untenable, as the lease was considered determinable in nature.
Decision: The High Court dismissed BPCL's appeals and applications, upholding the Commercial Court's judgment favoring the respondents. The Lease Deed was deemed determinable with no grounds for specific performance.
Date of Decision: April 10, 2024
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited v. Rajinder Singh Joon & Ors.
