Supreme Court Orders Fresh Investigation in Case of Alleged Property Dispute and Fraud; Transfer Petition Disposed    |     Vague Allegations of Improper Cross-Examination Insufficient for Recalling Witnesses: Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order    |     Honorable Acquittal in Criminal Proceedings Invalidates the Dismissal Based on Identical Allegations: Allahabad HC    |     Supreme Court Orders Fresh Selection for Punjab Laboratory Attendants; Eliminates Rural Area Marks    |     Entire Story of the Prosecution is a Piece of Fabrication: Supreme Court Acquits Accused in High-Profile Kidnapping Case    |     Madras High Court Overstepped in Directing Framing of Charges, Says Supreme Court; Stays Proceedings    |     Foreclosing Right to File Written Statement Without Serving Complaint Too Harsh: Supreme Court    |     Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Rash Driving Case; Compensation Reduced Due to Age and Health Factors    |     Prayers for Setting Aside Maintenance Order and Refund Not Maintainable Under Section 25(2) of Domestic Violence Act: Supreme Court    |     Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused on Grounds of Parity with Co-Accused and Prolonged Custody    |     Serious allegations of corruption demand thorough investigation Against Karnataka Bar Council Chairman:  Karnataka HC Refuses to Quash FIR    |     Probationers must be heard; a punitive action without inquiry is against natural justice: Punjab & Haryana HC Reinstates Judicial Officer    |     Refining Crude Soybean Oil is a Use of Goods Within the State, Attracting Entry Tax: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Arbitral Awards Cannot Be Overturned for Merely Better Views: Supreme Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Dismisses Appeals Over Encroachment Claims Due to Improper Demarcation Report    |     Teasing by Children Cannot Be Considered Grave and Sudden Provocation Under Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC: Gauhati High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Man Convicted of Murdering a 7-Year-Old Boy    |     ITC Blocking Under Rule 86A Cannot Exceed Available Balance in Electronic Credit Ledger: Delhi HC    |     Writ under Article 226 not maintainable when alternative remedies are available" – Delhi HC: Delhi HC Dismisses Writ Petition for FIR and Protection    |     Lack of Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Does Not Automatically Vitiate Proceedings: Calcutta HC    |     No Development Without Conveyance: Statutory Rights of Housing Society Prevail: Bombay High Court    |     Pecuniary Jurisdiction Based on Highest Valued Relief in Specific Performance Suit: Andhra Pradesh HC    |     Delay in Sale Deed Registration After Full Payment Cannot Justify Denial of Auctioned Property: Andhra Pradesh HC    |     Civil Judge Lacked Jurisdiction to Hear Suit Under Section 92 CPC; District Court is the Competent Forum: Allahabad High Court    |     Children are not only the assets of the parents but also of society: Kerala HC on Protests Involving Minors    |     A cheque issued as security does not represent a legally enforceable debt: Madras HC Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case    |    

MP Grants Divorce Due to Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage, Citing 'Infliction of Cruelty'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, comprising Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Hon'ble Shri Justice Pranay Verma, has pronounced a groundbreaking judgment granting divorce based on the irretrievable breakdown of a marriage. The decision, delivered on October 3, 2023, highlights the profound implications of long-term separation and the inability to reconcile in a matrimonial relationship.

The case, First Appeal No. 1699 of 2019, involved a husband, Chetan Sahgal, who sought the dissolution of his marriage to Richa Sahgal. The appellant, Chetan Sahgal, had cited both cruelty and desertion as grounds for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The couple had married in 2009 and had been living separately for nearly 14 years.

The court observed that the marriage had been marked by extensive legal battles, with Richa Sahgal initiating multiple cases against her husband and his family. This prolonged litigation, along with the extended separation, led the court to conclude that the marriage had irretrievably broken down.

The judgment relied on various legal precedents to establish the criteria for cruelty and desertion in the context of divorce cases. It noted that cruelty could be both physical and mental, and it need not involve deliberate or willful ill-treatment. Mental cruelty, including verbal abuses and insults leading to mental distress, was considered a valid ground for divorce.

Additionally, the court underscored the significance of long-term separation as a factor contributing to the irretrievable breakdown of marriage. It emphasized that reconciliation became increasingly difficult when parties had been living apart for an extended period.

In a crucial part of the judgment, the court cited the Supreme Court's view that repeated filing of criminal cases by one spouse against the other in a matrimonial dispute amounted to cruelty. This decision reaffirms the importance of considering the overall conduct and behavior of the parties in matrimonial relationships.

The judges' verdict highlighted that dissolution of the marriage was in the best interest of both parties, as there was no chance of reconciliation. The judgment stated, "Continuation of such a marriage would only lead to infliction of cruelty by either of the parties to each other."

This verdict signifies a significant legal development in recognizing the concept of irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a valid ground for divorce, especially in cases where the spouses have been living separately for an extended period and multiple legal disputes have arisen.

The judgment has been widely praised by legal experts, emphasizing the evolving understanding of marriage and divorce within the Indian legal framework.

As the legal landscape continues to evolve, this decision provides valuable guidance for future divorce cases, underlining the importance of considering the overall circumstances and behavior of the parties involved.

Date of Decision: 03 October 2023

CHETAN SAHGAL  vs SMT. RICHA SAHGARL SAHGAL           

Similar News