Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

MP Grants Divorce Due to Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage, Citing 'Infliction of Cruelty'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, comprising Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Hon'ble Shri Justice Pranay Verma, has pronounced a groundbreaking judgment granting divorce based on the irretrievable breakdown of a marriage. The decision, delivered on October 3, 2023, highlights the profound implications of long-term separation and the inability to reconcile in a matrimonial relationship.

The case, First Appeal No. 1699 of 2019, involved a husband, Chetan Sahgal, who sought the dissolution of his marriage to Richa Sahgal. The appellant, Chetan Sahgal, had cited both cruelty and desertion as grounds for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The couple had married in 2009 and had been living separately for nearly 14 years.

The court observed that the marriage had been marked by extensive legal battles, with Richa Sahgal initiating multiple cases against her husband and his family. This prolonged litigation, along with the extended separation, led the court to conclude that the marriage had irretrievably broken down.

The judgment relied on various legal precedents to establish the criteria for cruelty and desertion in the context of divorce cases. It noted that cruelty could be both physical and mental, and it need not involve deliberate or willful ill-treatment. Mental cruelty, including verbal abuses and insults leading to mental distress, was considered a valid ground for divorce.

Additionally, the court underscored the significance of long-term separation as a factor contributing to the irretrievable breakdown of marriage. It emphasized that reconciliation became increasingly difficult when parties had been living apart for an extended period.

In a crucial part of the judgment, the court cited the Supreme Court's view that repeated filing of criminal cases by one spouse against the other in a matrimonial dispute amounted to cruelty. This decision reaffirms the importance of considering the overall conduct and behavior of the parties in matrimonial relationships.

The judges' verdict highlighted that dissolution of the marriage was in the best interest of both parties, as there was no chance of reconciliation. The judgment stated, "Continuation of such a marriage would only lead to infliction of cruelty by either of the parties to each other."

This verdict signifies a significant legal development in recognizing the concept of irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a valid ground for divorce, especially in cases where the spouses have been living separately for an extended period and multiple legal disputes have arisen.

The judgment has been widely praised by legal experts, emphasizing the evolving understanding of marriage and divorce within the Indian legal framework.

As the legal landscape continues to evolve, this decision provides valuable guidance for future divorce cases, underlining the importance of considering the overall circumstances and behavior of the parties involved.

Date of Decision: 03 October 2023

CHETAN SAHGAL  vs SMT. RICHA SAHGARL SAHGAL           

Latest Legal News