Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

MP Grants Divorce Due to Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage, Citing 'Infliction of Cruelty'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, comprising Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Hon'ble Shri Justice Pranay Verma, has pronounced a groundbreaking judgment granting divorce based on the irretrievable breakdown of a marriage. The decision, delivered on October 3, 2023, highlights the profound implications of long-term separation and the inability to reconcile in a matrimonial relationship.

The case, First Appeal No. 1699 of 2019, involved a husband, Chetan Sahgal, who sought the dissolution of his marriage to Richa Sahgal. The appellant, Chetan Sahgal, had cited both cruelty and desertion as grounds for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The couple had married in 2009 and had been living separately for nearly 14 years.

The court observed that the marriage had been marked by extensive legal battles, with Richa Sahgal initiating multiple cases against her husband and his family. This prolonged litigation, along with the extended separation, led the court to conclude that the marriage had irretrievably broken down.

The judgment relied on various legal precedents to establish the criteria for cruelty and desertion in the context of divorce cases. It noted that cruelty could be both physical and mental, and it need not involve deliberate or willful ill-treatment. Mental cruelty, including verbal abuses and insults leading to mental distress, was considered a valid ground for divorce.

Additionally, the court underscored the significance of long-term separation as a factor contributing to the irretrievable breakdown of marriage. It emphasized that reconciliation became increasingly difficult when parties had been living apart for an extended period.

In a crucial part of the judgment, the court cited the Supreme Court's view that repeated filing of criminal cases by one spouse against the other in a matrimonial dispute amounted to cruelty. This decision reaffirms the importance of considering the overall conduct and behavior of the parties in matrimonial relationships.

The judges' verdict highlighted that dissolution of the marriage was in the best interest of both parties, as there was no chance of reconciliation. The judgment stated, "Continuation of such a marriage would only lead to infliction of cruelty by either of the parties to each other."

This verdict signifies a significant legal development in recognizing the concept of irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a valid ground for divorce, especially in cases where the spouses have been living separately for an extended period and multiple legal disputes have arisen.

The judgment has been widely praised by legal experts, emphasizing the evolving understanding of marriage and divorce within the Indian legal framework.

As the legal landscape continues to evolve, this decision provides valuable guidance for future divorce cases, underlining the importance of considering the overall circumstances and behavior of the parties involved.

Date of Decision: 03 October 2023

CHETAN SAHGAL  vs SMT. RICHA SAHGARL SAHGAL           

Latest Legal News