MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Mother's Love and Law Aligned": Rajasthan High Court Orders Custody of Minor to Educated, Employed Mother

04 September 2024 3:44 PM

By: sayum


Rajasthan High Court has ruled in favor of a mother seeking custody of her minor son, who was allegedly being held unlawfully by the child's paternal grandparents. The court, while delivering its judgment, underscored the paramount importance of the child's welfare and the natural guardianship rights of the mother under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Kusum Lata, a widow, married Lalaram Bairwa on March 15, 2021, and gave birth to a son on October 18, 2022. Tragically, Lalaram passed away in a road accident on February 18, 2024. Following her husband's death, Kusum Lata joined her duties as a School Lecturer, leaving her son in the care of his paternal grandparents. However, when the grandparents refused to return the child, Kusum Lata filed a habeas corpus petition in the Rajasthan High Court seeking the return of her son.

The court recognized the mother's natural guardianship under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, which prioritizes the rights of a mother over others in the custody of a minor child. The bench noted, "The petitioner is the natural guardian of the minor child, and there is no adverse material against her."

The court placed significant emphasis on the welfare of the child, noting that the child's best interests would be served in the custody of his mother. The judgment highlighted the mother's educational background and stable employment as factors that would ensure the child's well-being and future prospects. The court observed, "The petitioner, being a well-educated lady and employed as a school lecturer, is in a better position to take care of the child's welfare and secure his bright future."

In reaching its decision, the court relied on precedents set by the Supreme Court, particularly the principle that the child's welfare is paramount in custody matters. The court dismissed the respondents' concerns about the mother's ability to care for the child, stating that the allegations against her were unsubstantiated and that she was better positioned to provide for the child.

The court emphasized, "Apart from the petitioner being the natural guardian, even in order to ensure the welfare of the minor child, she should live with her natural family."

The Rajasthan High Court's decision reaffirms the legal principle that the welfare of the child is the primary consideration in custody disputes. By directing the grandparents to return the child to his mother, the court has highlighted the importance of natural guardianship and the critical role of the mother in a child's upbringing. This ruling is expected to influence future cases where the custody of minor children is contested, particularly in situations involving allegations of unlawful detention by relatives.

Date of Decision: August 21, 2024

Kusum Lata vs. The State of Rajasthan & Others

Latest Legal News