Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court Issuing NBW Merely For Absence Of Accused Already On Bail Is Improper; Liberty Cannot Be Dealt With Lightly: Orissa High Court 138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court

Mother Cannot Relinquish Right of Minor Daughter Telangana High Court Affirms Equal Property Rights"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court of Telangana has affirmed the equal property rights of daughters, stating that "Mother cannot relinquish the right of minor daughter." The ruling came in response to a partition suit filed by two daughters against their father, seeking their rightful share in ancestral property.

The case revolved around the alleged payment of Rs.30,000/- to the mother by the defendant and the purported relinquishment of the daughters' share. The defendant argued that the payment constituted a permanent alimony and that the mother had relinquished her minor daughters' right to their share in his properties.

However, the High Court emphasized the significance of the 2005 amendment to Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, which granted equal rights to daughters in ancestral property. The court held that the mother could not unilaterally relinquish the share of her minor children without their consent, particularly without a registered relinquishment deed.

In its judgment, the High Court stated, "The plea of an oral partition or memorandum of partition, unregistered, cannot be entertained. Unless a registered instrument has been executed and acted upon and the same has been proven in a Court of law through public documents, no plea of relinquishment or partition can be set up to deny the share of a coparcener."

The ruling underscores the importance of upholding the property rights of daughters and ensuring that any such transactions are carried out through legally valid means.

This judgment aligns with previous decisions by the Supreme Court and High Courts, reinforcing the principle that daughters are entitled to an equal share of ancestral property and that such rights cannot be casually relinquished.

Date of Decision: 05 September 2023

T Vijaya vs Turkapalli Mahhiah

 

Latest Legal News