Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Mother Cannot Relinquish Right of Minor Daughter Telangana High Court Affirms Equal Property Rights"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court of Telangana has affirmed the equal property rights of daughters, stating that "Mother cannot relinquish the right of minor daughter." The ruling came in response to a partition suit filed by two daughters against their father, seeking their rightful share in ancestral property.

The case revolved around the alleged payment of Rs.30,000/- to the mother by the defendant and the purported relinquishment of the daughters' share. The defendant argued that the payment constituted a permanent alimony and that the mother had relinquished her minor daughters' right to their share in his properties.

However, the High Court emphasized the significance of the 2005 amendment to Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, which granted equal rights to daughters in ancestral property. The court held that the mother could not unilaterally relinquish the share of her minor children without their consent, particularly without a registered relinquishment deed.

In its judgment, the High Court stated, "The plea of an oral partition or memorandum of partition, unregistered, cannot be entertained. Unless a registered instrument has been executed and acted upon and the same has been proven in a Court of law through public documents, no plea of relinquishment or partition can be set up to deny the share of a coparcener."

The ruling underscores the importance of upholding the property rights of daughters and ensuring that any such transactions are carried out through legally valid means.

This judgment aligns with previous decisions by the Supreme Court and High Courts, reinforcing the principle that daughters are entitled to an equal share of ancestral property and that such rights cannot be casually relinquished.

Date of Decision: 05 September 2023

T Vijaya vs Turkapalli Mahhiah

 

Latest Legal News