Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Minor Live-in Relationship Warrants Protection: High Court Allowed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a noteworthy judgment, the Punjab & Haryana High Court has ruled that an adult and a minor involved in a live-in relationship deserve protection under law. Presiding Justice Kuldeep Tiwari observed, "the facts of the petition in hand are similar to one noticed in the judgment rendered in the case of P…… Minor Through Vikram," thereby disposing of the case in terms of the judgment dated 28.03.2022.

The petitioners approached the Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, pleading for directions to protect their lives and liberty. They also sought to restrain private respondents from interfering in their relationship.

The counsel for the petitioners emphasized that petitioner no. 1 is 25 years old while petitioner no. 2 is a minor, supporting this argument by referring to the Aadhar Cards of both petitioners. In a bid to lend more weight to their request for protection, the counsel cited prior judgments of the High Court, particularly the case of P…… Minor Through Vikram, which laid down directives for the involvement of the Child Welfare Committee in cases where minors are part of live-in relationships.

Justice Tiwari responded by referring to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act of 2015. The Court directed the Child Welfare Committee to conduct the necessary inquiries and also urged the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) and Superintendent of Police (SP) to take appropriate measures to ensure the safety of the petitioners.

This judgment underlines the Court's growing focus on safeguarding personal liberties, even in complex cases involving adults and minors in relationships. It also signifies the importance of previously decided legal precedents in shaping current judicial outcomes.

The case has been disposed of, but its ramifications are sure to be felt in subsequent judgments involving similar circumstances.

Date of Decision: 26 October  2023

SANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News