TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

Minor Live-in Relationship Warrants Protection: High Court Allowed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a noteworthy judgment, the Punjab & Haryana High Court has ruled that an adult and a minor involved in a live-in relationship deserve protection under law. Presiding Justice Kuldeep Tiwari observed, "the facts of the petition in hand are similar to one noticed in the judgment rendered in the case of P…… Minor Through Vikram," thereby disposing of the case in terms of the judgment dated 28.03.2022.

The petitioners approached the Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, pleading for directions to protect their lives and liberty. They also sought to restrain private respondents from interfering in their relationship.

The counsel for the petitioners emphasized that petitioner no. 1 is 25 years old while petitioner no. 2 is a minor, supporting this argument by referring to the Aadhar Cards of both petitioners. In a bid to lend more weight to their request for protection, the counsel cited prior judgments of the High Court, particularly the case of P…… Minor Through Vikram, which laid down directives for the involvement of the Child Welfare Committee in cases where minors are part of live-in relationships.

Justice Tiwari responded by referring to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act of 2015. The Court directed the Child Welfare Committee to conduct the necessary inquiries and also urged the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) and Superintendent of Police (SP) to take appropriate measures to ensure the safety of the petitioners.

This judgment underlines the Court's growing focus on safeguarding personal liberties, even in complex cases involving adults and minors in relationships. It also signifies the importance of previously decided legal precedents in shaping current judicial outcomes.

The case has been disposed of, but its ramifications are sure to be felt in subsequent judgments involving similar circumstances.

Date of Decision: 26 October  2023

SANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News