Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Minor Live-in Relationship Warrants Protection: High Court Allowed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a noteworthy judgment, the Punjab & Haryana High Court has ruled that an adult and a minor involved in a live-in relationship deserve protection under law. Presiding Justice Kuldeep Tiwari observed, "the facts of the petition in hand are similar to one noticed in the judgment rendered in the case of P…… Minor Through Vikram," thereby disposing of the case in terms of the judgment dated 28.03.2022.

The petitioners approached the Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, pleading for directions to protect their lives and liberty. They also sought to restrain private respondents from interfering in their relationship.

The counsel for the petitioners emphasized that petitioner no. 1 is 25 years old while petitioner no. 2 is a minor, supporting this argument by referring to the Aadhar Cards of both petitioners. In a bid to lend more weight to their request for protection, the counsel cited prior judgments of the High Court, particularly the case of P…… Minor Through Vikram, which laid down directives for the involvement of the Child Welfare Committee in cases where minors are part of live-in relationships.

Justice Tiwari responded by referring to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act of 2015. The Court directed the Child Welfare Committee to conduct the necessary inquiries and also urged the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) and Superintendent of Police (SP) to take appropriate measures to ensure the safety of the petitioners.

This judgment underlines the Court's growing focus on safeguarding personal liberties, even in complex cases involving adults and minors in relationships. It also signifies the importance of previously decided legal precedents in shaping current judicial outcomes.

The case has been disposed of, but its ramifications are sure to be felt in subsequent judgments involving similar circumstances.

Date of Decision: 26 October  2023

SANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News