Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Minor Live-in Relationship Warrants Protection: High Court Allowed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a noteworthy judgment, the Punjab & Haryana High Court has ruled that an adult and a minor involved in a live-in relationship deserve protection under law. Presiding Justice Kuldeep Tiwari observed, "the facts of the petition in hand are similar to one noticed in the judgment rendered in the case of P…… Minor Through Vikram," thereby disposing of the case in terms of the judgment dated 28.03.2022.

The petitioners approached the Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, pleading for directions to protect their lives and liberty. They also sought to restrain private respondents from interfering in their relationship.

The counsel for the petitioners emphasized that petitioner no. 1 is 25 years old while petitioner no. 2 is a minor, supporting this argument by referring to the Aadhar Cards of both petitioners. In a bid to lend more weight to their request for protection, the counsel cited prior judgments of the High Court, particularly the case of P…… Minor Through Vikram, which laid down directives for the involvement of the Child Welfare Committee in cases where minors are part of live-in relationships.

Justice Tiwari responded by referring to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act of 2015. The Court directed the Child Welfare Committee to conduct the necessary inquiries and also urged the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) and Superintendent of Police (SP) to take appropriate measures to ensure the safety of the petitioners.

This judgment underlines the Court's growing focus on safeguarding personal liberties, even in complex cases involving adults and minors in relationships. It also signifies the importance of previously decided legal precedents in shaping current judicial outcomes.

The case has been disposed of, but its ramifications are sure to be felt in subsequent judgments involving similar circumstances.

Date of Decision: 26 October  2023

SANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

 

Latest Legal News