Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Matrimonial Bond is Beyond Repair When Long Separation Leads to Mental Cruelty - Delhi High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Mental Cruelty

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court on April 2, 2024, allowed an appeal for divorce, observing that prolonged separation and continuous legal disputes can constitute mental cruelty, thereby rendering the matrimonial bond irreparable.

 

The court granted divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, highlighting that mental cruelty can be a legitimate ground for dissolution of marriage. This judgment underscores the evolving understanding of cruelty in matrimonial relationships.

The appellant, Sh. Avneshwar Singh, filed an appeal against the Family Court's dismissal of his petition for divorce and his wife's petition for Restitution of Conjugal Rights. The High Court revisited allegations from both parties, including neglect, harassment, extramarital affairs, and threats, considering the impact of these accusations on their marriage.

 

Evidence & Counter Allegations: The court found the appellant's allegations, including threats with a knife and vulgar messages, unsupported by concrete evidence. Conversely, the respondent refuted cruelty claims and accused the appellant of harassment and extramarital affairs.

 

Impact of Litigation on Mental Cruelty: The Court recognized derogatory language by the respondent towards the appellant’s father and her complaints to the appellant’s employer as mental cruelty. The prolonged legal battles, spanning over a decade, were viewed as exacerbating the cruelty.

 

Legal Precedents Cited: The court referred to several cases, including Joydeep Majumdar Vs. Bharti Jaiswal Majumdar and Samar Ghosh Vs. Jaya Ghosh, to highlight how persistent legal disputes and defamatory allegations can constitute mental cruelty.

 

Decision: Granting of Divorce: The Delhi High Court, acknowledging the mental cruelty inflicted upon the appellant by the respondent, allowed the appeal and granted divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Date of Decision: April 02, 2024.

XXXX Vs. XXX

 

Latest Legal News