CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Matrimonial Bond is Beyond Repair When Long Separation Leads to Mental Cruelty - Delhi High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Mental Cruelty

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court on April 2, 2024, allowed an appeal for divorce, observing that prolonged separation and continuous legal disputes can constitute mental cruelty, thereby rendering the matrimonial bond irreparable.

 

The court granted divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, highlighting that mental cruelty can be a legitimate ground for dissolution of marriage. This judgment underscores the evolving understanding of cruelty in matrimonial relationships.

The appellant, Sh. Avneshwar Singh, filed an appeal against the Family Court's dismissal of his petition for divorce and his wife's petition for Restitution of Conjugal Rights. The High Court revisited allegations from both parties, including neglect, harassment, extramarital affairs, and threats, considering the impact of these accusations on their marriage.

 

Evidence & Counter Allegations: The court found the appellant's allegations, including threats with a knife and vulgar messages, unsupported by concrete evidence. Conversely, the respondent refuted cruelty claims and accused the appellant of harassment and extramarital affairs.

 

Impact of Litigation on Mental Cruelty: The Court recognized derogatory language by the respondent towards the appellant’s father and her complaints to the appellant’s employer as mental cruelty. The prolonged legal battles, spanning over a decade, were viewed as exacerbating the cruelty.

 

Legal Precedents Cited: The court referred to several cases, including Joydeep Majumdar Vs. Bharti Jaiswal Majumdar and Samar Ghosh Vs. Jaya Ghosh, to highlight how persistent legal disputes and defamatory allegations can constitute mental cruelty.

 

Decision: Granting of Divorce: The Delhi High Court, acknowledging the mental cruelty inflicted upon the appellant by the respondent, allowed the appeal and granted divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Date of Decision: April 02, 2024.

XXXX Vs. XXX

 

Latest Legal News