Section 84 BNSS | Mechanical Declaration as ‘Proclaimed Person’ Without Due Procedure Illegal: Punjab & Haryana High Court Bail is the Exception, Not the Rule in NDPS Cases Involving Commercial Quantity: Himachal Pradesh High Court Denies Bail in ₹5 Crore Drug Racket Adopted Son Is Class I Heir—Collateral Relatives Cannot Challenge Will in Probate Court: Madras High Court Assignment of Leasehold Rights is Transfer of Immovable Property, Not Supply of Services: Bombay High Court Quashes GST Show Cause Notice Against Aerocom Irretrievable Breakdown Is Cruelty in Itself When the Marriage Has Become a Legal Fiction: Calcutta High Court Grants Divorce Sexual Intercourse by Deceitful Means Attracts Prima Facie Offence Under Section 69 BNS: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Criminal Proceedings in False Promise of Marriage Case Scheduled Areas Are Constitutionally Protected, Not Constitutionally Frozen: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Municipal Inclusion of Tribal Territories Death of Innocents Due to Spurious Liquor Is a Serious Blow to Society—Bail Cannot Be Granted Merely Because Viscera Reports Are Inconclusive: Orissa High Court When the Sole Eyewitness Is Dead, Confession Alone Can’t Convict: Madras High Court Acquits Chain Snatching Accused Office of Advocate in Residential Building Not a Commercial Use: MP High Court Absence of Judicial Satisfaction Renders Declaration Under Section 82 CrPC Illegal: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PO Order No Entitlement to Interest Beyond 1.5% Without Agreed Terms: MP High Court Dismisses Creditors' Appeals Against Official Liquidator's Adjudication Supervisory Jurisdiction Is Not Appellate Review : Kerala High Court Refuses to Interfere with Pension Reduction Ordered Without Regular Disciplinary Enquiry Revenue Authorities Cannot Alter Mutation of Acquired Land Based on ‘Recalled’ Judicial Orders: Karnataka High Court Section 45 Cannot Justify Indefinite Detention - Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Defeats Article 21: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 223 BNSS | No Cognizance Without Complainant's Oath: Gauhati High Court 304A IPC | No Presumption of Rash Driving Merely Because of Accident: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Child Death Case Auction Purchaser Has No Absolute Right: Calcutta High Court Upholds Borrower's Right of Redemption Under SARFAESI Act 15 Days’ Notice Under TP Act Is Sufficient To Terminate Monthly Tenancy After Lease Expiry: Bombay High Court Indefinite Blacklisting Without Authority or Hearing is Civil Death in Disguise: Allahabad High Court Environmental Tribunal Cannot Be A Toothless Watchdog… It Must Act Without Waiting For The Metaphorical Godot: Andhra Pradesh High Court FIR Lodged After Marital Breakdown Based on “Emotional Outburst”, Not Rape: Himachal Pradesh High Court Quashes Case Post-Divorce SARFAESI | Deposit Before Bank Can’t Be Treated as Statutory Pre-Deposit Before DRAT: Kerala High Court Truth Cannot Be Gagged by Injunction: Madras High Court Refuses Celebrity Chef’s Plea to Restrain Allegedly Defamatory Social Media Posts on Intimate Relationship Probate Not Mandatory for Will Executed in Keonjhar – Civil Court Can Decide Title Based on Unprobated Will: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Daughter’s Suit Against Valid Gift to Nephew

Madras High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Temple Practices, Upholds Widow's Right to Worship"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Madras High Court, presided over by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, has upheld the rights of widows to participate in religious festivals and enter places of worship without discrimination. The court's ruling came in response to Writ Petition No. 23119 of 2023, where the petitioner, Thangamani, the widow of Late Pongiyannan, sought police protection to attend the Periyakaruparayan temple festival.

The court categorically denounced the archaic beliefs and senseless practices that demean women based on widowhood. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh asserted, "All this can never continue in a civilized society, which is governed by the rule of law. A woman, by herself, has a status and identity, and that cannot in any way come down or be taken away depending upon her marital status."

The judgment emphasized that every individual, irrespective of their marital status, has an inherent right to participate in religious festivals and worship God. The court reprimanded respondents 5 and 6, who attempted to stop Thangamani and her son Srinath from entering the temple. The court directed the police to take immediate action against any individual who tries to impede the petitioner's participation in the temple festival.

This landmark judgment sends a strong message against discriminatory practices and upholds the principles of equality and inclusivity in religious spaces. It sets a precedent for challenging outdated beliefs that hinder the rights and dignity of women in society. The court's ruling is a step forward in promoting a more tolerant and progressive society, where everyone is treated with respect and equal rights are upheld.

Date of Decision: 04.08.2023

Thangamani vs .The Collector,    Erode District,  

Latest Legal News