Revenue Authority Cannot Vest Land In State Under Section 79A, Suo Motu Proceedings After 11 Years Fatal: Gujarat High Court Campaigning During 48-Hour Silent Period Is Not 'Undue Influence' Under Section 123(2), Election Petition Must Plead How Result Was Materially Affected: Bombay High Court DVDs Carrying Encoded Data Infringe Patent Even If Stampers Are Outsourced: Delhi High Court in Philips’ DVD-ROM Patent Dispute Departmental Exoneration Does Not Bar Criminal Trial If Key Evidence Not Considered: Karnataka HC Refuses To Quash PSI’s Corruption Case Can't Claim Irrevocable License Under Section 60 Easements Act Without Pleading It First: Punjab & Haryana High Court Ex Parte Decree Obtained Behind Back of True Owner Confers No Title; Appellate Stage Cannot Be Used to Rescue a Fundamentally Flawed Claim: Supreme Court Order XLI Rule 27 CPC | Appeal Cannot Be Decided Without First Adjudicating Additional Evidence Application: Supreme Court Section 498A IPC | Only Allegation Quarrelling Is Not a Criminal Offence, Cannot Sustain Cognizance: Supreme Court Quash Proceedings Eye-Witness Survives 82 Pages of Cross-Examination: Allahabad High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Payment of Tax Receipts Is Not A Conclusive Proof of Possession of Property: Andhra Pradesh High Court Spa Owner Who Personally Received Marked Currency And Promised 'Nice Females With Closed Door Rooms' Cannot Escape Trafficking Charges: Bombay High Court No Person Can Transfer A Better Title Than What He Possesses In Property So Transferred: Andhra Pradesh High Court Unsubstantiated Allegations of Illicit Affair and Attempt to Kill Child in Written Statement Amount to Mental Cruelty: Calcutta High Court Grants Divorce Child Dies Inside Anganwadi Centre After Repeated Complaints About Exposed Wires Went Unaddressed: Chhattisgarh High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance, Directs Statewide Safety Audit 'High Speed' Without Mentioning Approximate Speed Not Sufficient To Prove Rash And Negligent Driving Under Section 279 IPC: Himachal Pradesh High Court 'Reverse Passing Off' Is Not an Actionable Tort in Indian Trade Mark Law: Delhi High Court: SARFAESI E-Auction Purchaser Cannot Be Prosecuted For Undervaluation When DRT Has Affirmed Valuation: Jharkhand High Court Republishing Defamatory Facebook Post On Website Constitutes Fresh Offence of Defamation; Prior Publication In Public Domain No Defence: Kerala High Court One Year Custody Not Prolonged In Cases Involving Attack On Police Post With Explosive Substance: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail Bribe Demand Can Be Proved Through Electronic Evidence Even If Complainant Turns Hostile: Rajasthan High Court Sand Theft Under BNS And Kerala Sand Act Can Be Prosecuted Simultaneously; Earlier Contrary View Per Incuriam: Kerala High Court Judge Overrules Own Judgment

Madras High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Temple Practices, Upholds Widow's Right to Worship"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Madras High Court, presided over by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, has upheld the rights of widows to participate in religious festivals and enter places of worship without discrimination. The court's ruling came in response to Writ Petition No. 23119 of 2023, where the petitioner, Thangamani, the widow of Late Pongiyannan, sought police protection to attend the Periyakaruparayan temple festival.

The court categorically denounced the archaic beliefs and senseless practices that demean women based on widowhood. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh asserted, "All this can never continue in a civilized society, which is governed by the rule of law. A woman, by herself, has a status and identity, and that cannot in any way come down or be taken away depending upon her marital status."

The judgment emphasized that every individual, irrespective of their marital status, has an inherent right to participate in religious festivals and worship God. The court reprimanded respondents 5 and 6, who attempted to stop Thangamani and her son Srinath from entering the temple. The court directed the police to take immediate action against any individual who tries to impede the petitioner's participation in the temple festival.

This landmark judgment sends a strong message against discriminatory practices and upholds the principles of equality and inclusivity in religious spaces. It sets a precedent for challenging outdated beliefs that hinder the rights and dignity of women in society. The court's ruling is a step forward in promoting a more tolerant and progressive society, where everyone is treated with respect and equal rights are upheld.

Date of Decision: 04.08.2023

Thangamani vs .The Collector,    Erode District,  

Latest Legal News