Inadequate Explanation Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Foundation For Conviction If Prosecution Fails To Prove Case: Allahabad High Court No-Confidence Motion In Housing Societies Fails If 2/3 Majority Not Met; Fractions In Voting Threshold Cannot Be Rounded Down: Bombay High Court Successor Rent Controller Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Or Act As Appellate Court Under Review Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Restores Eviction Order Article 21 Overrides PMLA Section 45 Rigors In Cases Of Unduly Long Incarceration Without Trial: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail To SSC Scam ‘Middleman’ Unregistered Family Partition Deed Recording Past Oral Arrangement Doesn't Require Compulsory Registration: Gujarat High Court Private Banks Acting As Authorised Dealers Under FEMA Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction; Can Refuse Transactions For 'Sanctions-Related' Concerns: Gauhati High Court Non-Examination Of Investigating Officer Not Fatal To Prosecution Case If Eyewitness Testimony Is Credible & Trustworthy: Jharkhand High Court Mere Denial Of Signature Insufficient When Execution Is Proved Through Endorsements: Karnataka High Court Restores Specific Performance Decree Sectarianism Claims Can't Discredit Reliable Testimony Of Child Sexual Abuse Victim: Kerala High Court Upholds Madrassa Teacher's Conviction State Must Prove Specific 'Public Interest' To Exempt Projects From Social Impact Assessment Under Section 10A Land Acquisition Act: Telangana High Court Or 2 Rule 2 CPC |Failure To Seek Specific Performance In Earlier Injunction Suit Bars Subsequent Claim; Readiness & Willingness Must Be Continuous: Madras High Court Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Does Not Result In Automatic Discharge In Criminal Case: Orissa High Court History Sheet Can Be Opened On 'Reasonable Belief' Even Without Conviction, But Must Be Reviewed After 7 Years Of Good Conduct: Rajasthan High Court

Madras High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Temple Practices, Upholds Widow's Right to Worship"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Madras High Court, presided over by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, has upheld the rights of widows to participate in religious festivals and enter places of worship without discrimination. The court's ruling came in response to Writ Petition No. 23119 of 2023, where the petitioner, Thangamani, the widow of Late Pongiyannan, sought police protection to attend the Periyakaruparayan temple festival.

The court categorically denounced the archaic beliefs and senseless practices that demean women based on widowhood. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh asserted, "All this can never continue in a civilized society, which is governed by the rule of law. A woman, by herself, has a status and identity, and that cannot in any way come down or be taken away depending upon her marital status."

The judgment emphasized that every individual, irrespective of their marital status, has an inherent right to participate in religious festivals and worship God. The court reprimanded respondents 5 and 6, who attempted to stop Thangamani and her son Srinath from entering the temple. The court directed the police to take immediate action against any individual who tries to impede the petitioner's participation in the temple festival.

This landmark judgment sends a strong message against discriminatory practices and upholds the principles of equality and inclusivity in religious spaces. It sets a precedent for challenging outdated beliefs that hinder the rights and dignity of women in society. The court's ruling is a step forward in promoting a more tolerant and progressive society, where everyone is treated with respect and equal rights are upheld.

Date of Decision: 04.08.2023

Thangamani vs .The Collector,    Erode District,  

Latest Legal News