Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Madras High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Temple Practices, Upholds Widow's Right to Worship"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Madras High Court, presided over by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, has upheld the rights of widows to participate in religious festivals and enter places of worship without discrimination. The court's ruling came in response to Writ Petition No. 23119 of 2023, where the petitioner, Thangamani, the widow of Late Pongiyannan, sought police protection to attend the Periyakaruparayan temple festival.

The court categorically denounced the archaic beliefs and senseless practices that demean women based on widowhood. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh asserted, "All this can never continue in a civilized society, which is governed by the rule of law. A woman, by herself, has a status and identity, and that cannot in any way come down or be taken away depending upon her marital status."

The judgment emphasized that every individual, irrespective of their marital status, has an inherent right to participate in religious festivals and worship God. The court reprimanded respondents 5 and 6, who attempted to stop Thangamani and her son Srinath from entering the temple. The court directed the police to take immediate action against any individual who tries to impede the petitioner's participation in the temple festival.

This landmark judgment sends a strong message against discriminatory practices and upholds the principles of equality and inclusivity in religious spaces. It sets a precedent for challenging outdated beliefs that hinder the rights and dignity of women in society. The court's ruling is a step forward in promoting a more tolerant and progressive society, where everyone is treated with respect and equal rights are upheld.

Date of Decision: 04.08.2023

Thangamani vs .The Collector,    Erode District,  

Latest Legal News