Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’ Article 21 Rights Not Absolute In Cases Threatening National Security: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted In Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case A Computer Programme That Solves a Technical Problem Is Not Barred Under Section 3(k): Madras High Court Allows Patent for Software-Based Data Lineage System Premature Auction Without 30-Day Redemption Violates Section 176 and Bank’s Own Terms: Orissa High Court Quashes Canara Bank’s Gold Loan Sale Courts Can’t Stall Climate-Resilient Public Projects: Madras High Court Lifts Status Quo on Eco Park, Pond Works at Race Club Land No Cross-Examination, No Conviction: Gujarat High Court Quashes Customs Penalty for Violating Principles of Natural Justice ITAT Was Wrong in Disregarding Statements Under Oath, But Additions Unsustainable Without Corroborative Evidence: Madras High Court Deduction Theory Under Old Land Acquisition Law Has No Place Under 2013 Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Compensation for Metro Land Acquisition UIT Cannot Turn Around After Issuing Pattas, It's Estopped Now: Rajasthan High Court Private Doctor’s Widow Eligible for COVID Insurance if Duty Proven: Supreme Court Rebukes Narrow Interpretation of COVID-Era Orders Smaller Benches Cannot Override Constitution Bench Authority Under The Guise Of Clarification: Supreme Court Criticises Judicial Indiscipline Public Premises Act, 1971 | PP Act Overrides State Rent Control Laws for All Tenancies; Suhas Pophale Overruled: Supreme Court Court Has No Power To Reduce Sentence Below Statutory Minimum Under NDPS Act: Supreme Court Denies Relief To Young Mother Convicted With 23.5 kg Ganja Non-Compliance With Section 52-A Is Not Per Se Fatal: Supreme Court Clarifies Law On Sampling Procedure Under NDPS Act MBA Degree Doesn’t Feed the Stomach: Delhi High Court Says Wife’s Qualification No Ground to Deny Maintenance

Madras High Court Allows Students to Continue Medical Course Despite Irregular Admissions, Orders College to Compensate for Violations

04 September 2024 10:12 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, a single judge bench delivered a landmark judgment allowing a group of students to continue their medical course despite admissions being deemed irregular. The judgment, issued by the honorable court, highlights the violations committed by the college and mandates appropriate compensation for the wrongdoing. The case revolved around the validity of admissions made through stray vacancies and the alleged violation of laws and regulations governing the admission process.

Madras High court emphasized, “The method adopted by the college in admitting students for the stray vacancies is not in consonance with the law declared by the Hon’ble Supreme Court as well as the regulations made in this regard.” The court further stated that the issue had already been conclusively settled through previous judgments at the Writ Court, Division Bench, and Supreme Court levels.

Despite the irregularities, the court acknowledged the students’ higher marks and genuine approach, allowing them to continue their course. The court recognized the potential impact on the students’ careers if they were forced to leave at this stage, emphasizing that merit had not been completely disregarded in their admissions.

However, the judgment also brought to light a shocking revelation. The parents of the students disclosed that they had made substantial One Time Payments, commonly known as capitation fees, to the college. The court considered this a serious issue and ordered the college to deposit the entire amount of Rs.2,76,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores and Seventy Six Lakhs only) with interest in a separate account jointly held by the Selection Committee and University Registrar. This amount will be utilized as a special scholarship for more meritorious candidates in future academic years.

Furthermore, the court directed the college to surrender five seats in the Management quota for the upcoming academic year as a compensatory measure. The Selection Committee will then select additional candidates for admission in the Government quota.

Date of Decision: 28 June 2023

K.Pooja Chakravarthi and Ors. vs The Tamil Nadu and Ors.

Latest Legal News