Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Madras High Court Allows Students to Continue Medical Course Despite Irregular Admissions, Orders College to Compensate for Violations

04 September 2024 10:12 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, a single judge bench delivered a landmark judgment allowing a group of students to continue their medical course despite admissions being deemed irregular. The judgment, issued by the honorable court, highlights the violations committed by the college and mandates appropriate compensation for the wrongdoing. The case revolved around the validity of admissions made through stray vacancies and the alleged violation of laws and regulations governing the admission process.

Madras High court emphasized, “The method adopted by the college in admitting students for the stray vacancies is not in consonance with the law declared by the Hon’ble Supreme Court as well as the regulations made in this regard.” The court further stated that the issue had already been conclusively settled through previous judgments at the Writ Court, Division Bench, and Supreme Court levels.

Despite the irregularities, the court acknowledged the students’ higher marks and genuine approach, allowing them to continue their course. The court recognized the potential impact on the students’ careers if they were forced to leave at this stage, emphasizing that merit had not been completely disregarded in their admissions.

However, the judgment also brought to light a shocking revelation. The parents of the students disclosed that they had made substantial One Time Payments, commonly known as capitation fees, to the college. The court considered this a serious issue and ordered the college to deposit the entire amount of Rs.2,76,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores and Seventy Six Lakhs only) with interest in a separate account jointly held by the Selection Committee and University Registrar. This amount will be utilized as a special scholarship for more meritorious candidates in future academic years.

Furthermore, the court directed the college to surrender five seats in the Management quota for the upcoming academic year as a compensatory measure. The Selection Committee will then select additional candidates for admission in the Government quota.

Date of Decision: 28 June 2023

K.Pooja Chakravarthi and Ors. vs The Tamil Nadu and Ors.

Latest Legal News