Rigours of UAPA Melt Before Article 21: Jharkhand High Court Grants Bail After Six Years of Incarceration Accused Cannot Challenge in Arguments What He Never Challenged in Cross-Examination: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction Counterblast Plea, Civil Dispute Defence No Shield When Cognizable Offence Is Disclosed: Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against Ex-Driver Accused Of Outraging Modesty Lawyers Who Burned a Colleague's Furniture for Defending Toll Workers Have Tainted a Noble Profession: Supreme Court A Suspicious Dying Declaration Cannot Hang a Man: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Murder Conviction IQ of 65, Memory Loss, Frontal Lobe Damage: Supreme Court Holds Brain-Injured Manager Suffered 100% Functional Disability, Enhances Compensation to ₹97.73 Lakh Cannot Be Forced to Pay Gratuity to Retired Employees Who Refuse to Vacate Company Quarters: Supreme Court Victim Who Incited Riot Inside Court Cannot Blame Accused for Trial Delay: Supreme Court Grants Bail in Section 307 Case You Cannot Sell What You Don’t Own: ‘Vendor’s Half Share Means Buyer Gets Only Half’ : Andhra Pradesh High Court Nagaland's Oil Laws Face Constitutional Challenge: Gauhati High Court Sends Union-State Dispute to Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 3 CPC | Will's Validity Cannot Be Decided in Substitution Proceedings: Himachal Pradesh High Court 6-Year-Old Loses Arm To Live 11kV Wire Passing 'Almost Touching' Her Balcony: Punjab & Haryana High Court Awards Rs. 99.93 Lakh To Child Despite Nigam Blaming Father For 'Extending Balcony' Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 To Quash Rape & POCSO Conviction After Marriage Between Accused And Victim NGT Cannot Order Demolition of Temple On Ground of Encroachment of Park: Supreme Court Quashes Removal Order For Want of Jurisdiction Hostile Witnesses & Doubtful Recovery Can Collapse Prosecution: J&K High Court Sets High Threshold for Criminal Proof Compassion Cannot Override the Clock: Karnataka HC Denies Job to Guardian Aunt Despite 2021 Rule Change” Second Marriage During Pendency of Divorce Appeal Is Void: Kerala High Court Appearing in Exam Does Not Cure Attendance Deficiency: MP High Court Upholds 'Year Down' Against BBA Student With Sub-30% Attendance Patna High Court Directs Bihar To Submit Detailed Rehabilitation Plan For Recovered Mental Health Patients, Expand Half-Way Homes Across State Rajasthan High Court Upholds Refusal to Drop Bharat Band Stone-Pelting Case

Madras High Court Allows Students to Continue Medical Course Despite Irregular Admissions, Orders College to Compensate for Violations

04 September 2024 10:12 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, a single judge bench delivered a landmark judgment allowing a group of students to continue their medical course despite admissions being deemed irregular. The judgment, issued by the honorable court, highlights the violations committed by the college and mandates appropriate compensation for the wrongdoing. The case revolved around the validity of admissions made through stray vacancies and the alleged violation of laws and regulations governing the admission process.

Madras High court emphasized, “The method adopted by the college in admitting students for the stray vacancies is not in consonance with the law declared by the Hon’ble Supreme Court as well as the regulations made in this regard.” The court further stated that the issue had already been conclusively settled through previous judgments at the Writ Court, Division Bench, and Supreme Court levels.

Despite the irregularities, the court acknowledged the students’ higher marks and genuine approach, allowing them to continue their course. The court recognized the potential impact on the students’ careers if they were forced to leave at this stage, emphasizing that merit had not been completely disregarded in their admissions.

However, the judgment also brought to light a shocking revelation. The parents of the students disclosed that they had made substantial One Time Payments, commonly known as capitation fees, to the college. The court considered this a serious issue and ordered the college to deposit the entire amount of Rs.2,76,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores and Seventy Six Lakhs only) with interest in a separate account jointly held by the Selection Committee and University Registrar. This amount will be utilized as a special scholarship for more meritorious candidates in future academic years.

Furthermore, the court directed the college to surrender five seats in the Management quota for the upcoming academic year as a compensatory measure. The Selection Committee will then select additional candidates for admission in the Government quota.

Date of Decision: 28 June 2023

K.Pooja Chakravarthi and Ors. vs The Tamil Nadu and Ors.

Latest Legal News