Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC

Madras High Court Acquits Mentally Ill Woman of Murder Charges Under Section 84 IPC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has acquitted Petchiyammal, who was earlier convicted for the murder of her eight-year-old nephew. The court set aside her life sentence, acknowledging her long-standing battle with paranoid schizophrenia. This landmark judgment emphasizes the importance of considering mental health in criminal proceedings.

The appellant, Petchiyammal, was convicted by the II Additional District Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi, for the murder of her nephew by setting him on fire. Her defense centered on her diagnosed mental condition, paranoid schizophrenia, questioning her ability to comprehend the nature of her act.

The chain of events are so complete, unerringly leading to the conclusion that the appellant had committed the offence,” stated the Hon’ble Justices M.S. Ramesh and M.N. Nirmal Kumar, recognizing the circumstantial evidence against the appellant. However, they also noted, “The only ground to be considered is whether the appellant was affected with mental disorder prior to occurrence, during the occurrence and after the occurrence.”

Highlighting the significance of mental health in the legal framework, the court observed, “This Court has considered the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record, as well as the medical records of the appellant,” emphasizing the comprehensive examination of the appellant’s mental state over the years.

Subsequently, the court invoked Section 84 of the IPC, which exempts individuals of unsound mind from criminal liability, leading to Petchiyammal’s acquittal. “We are satisfied that the appellant is a person who is entitled to the benefit of Section 84 of IPC,” the bench declared.

Additionally, the court ordered her safe custody and treatment at the Institute of Mental Health, Kilpauk, Chennai, ensuring her continuous medical care. “The appellant shall be given treatment... If her mental health condition improves, she shall be kept in any of the Welfare Home for Women,” the court directed, providing a path for her rehabilitation.

Date of Decision: 24.01.2024

Petchiyammal VS State

 

Latest Legal News