Mere Allegations of Harassment Do Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail to Wife in Matrimonial Suicide Case 'Convenience Of Wife Not A Thumb Rule, But Custody Of Minor Child Is A Weighing Aspect': Punjab & Haryana HC Transfers Divorce Case To Rohtak MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Cooperative Society Is A “Veritable Party” To Arbitration Clause In Flat Agreements, Temple Trust Entitled To Arbitrate As Non-Signatory: Bombay High Court State Government Cannot Review Its Own Revisional Orders Under Section 41(3): Allahabad High Court Affirms Legal Bar on Successive Reviews When Several Issues Arise, Courts Must Answer Each With Reasons: Supreme Court Automatic Retention Trumps Lessee Tag: Calcutta High Court Declares Saregama India ‘Raiyat’, Directs Reconsideration of Land Conversion Application Recovery of Valid Ticket Raises Presumption of Bona Fide Travel – Burden Shifts to Railways: Delhi High Court Restores Railway Accident Claim Failure to Frame Issue on Limitation Vitiates Award of Compensation Under Telegraph Act: Gauhati High Court Sets Aside Order, Remands Matter Compassionate Appointment Is Not a Heritable Right: Gujarat High Court Rejects 9-Year Delayed Claim, Orders Re-Issuance of ₹4 Lakh Compensation Court Cannot Rewrite Contracts to Suit Contractor’s Convenience: Kerala High Court Upholds Termination of Road Work Under Risk and Cost Clause Post-Bail Conduct Is Irrelevant in Appeal Against Grant of Bail: Supreme Court Clarifies Crucial Distinction Between Appeal and Cancellation Granting Anticipatory Bail to a Long-Absconding Accused Makes a Mockery of the Judicial Process: Supreme Court Cracks Down on Pre-Arrest Bail in Murder Case Recognition as an Intangible Asset Does Not Confer Ownership: Supreme Court Draws a Sharp Line Between Accounting Entries and Property Rights IBC Cannot Be the Guiding Principle for Restructuring the Ownership and Control of Spectrum: Supreme Court Reasserts Public Trust Over Natural Resources Courts Cannot Convict First and Search for Law Later: Supreme Court Faults Prosecution for Ignoring Statutory Foundation in Cement Case When the Law Itself Stood Withdrawn, How Could Its Violation Survive?: Supreme Court Quashes 1994 Cement Conviction Under E.C. Act Ten Years Means Ten Years – Not a Day Less: Supreme Court Refuses to Dilute Statutory Experience Requirement for SET Exemption SET in Malayalam Cannot Qualify You to Teach Economics: Supreme Court Upholds Subject-Specific Eligibility for HSST Appointments Outsourcing Cannot Become A Tool To Defeat Regularization: Supreme Court On Perennial Nature Of Government Work Once Similarly Placed Workers Were Regularized, Denial to Others Is Discrimination: Supreme Court Directs Regularization of Income Tax Daily-Wage Workers Right To Form Association Is Protected — But Not A Right To Run It Free From Regulation: Supreme Court Recalibrates Article 19 In Sports Governance S. Nithya Cannot Be Transplanted Into Cricket: Supreme Court Shields District Cricket Bodies From Judicially Imposed Structural Overhaul Will | Propounder Must Dispel Every Suspicious Circumstance — Failure Is Fatal: : Punjab & Haryana High Court Electronic Evidence Authenticity Jeopardized by Unexplained Delay and Procedural Omissions: MP High Court Rejects Belated 65B Application Not Answering to the Questions of the IO Would Not Ipso Facto Mean There Is Non-Cooperation: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Undertaking to Satisfy Award Is Not Waiver of Appeal: Supreme Court Restores Insurer’s Statutory Right

Lieutenant Governor of NCT Delhi Bound by Aid and Advice of Council of Ministers in Legislative Matters: Supreme Court

03 September 2024 10:18 AM

By: Admin


Today on 11 May 2023, in a significant ruling, the Supreme Court held that the Lieutenant Governor of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) is bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers of NCTD in matters within the legislative scope of NCTD, particularly in relation to services. The Court clarified that the executive power of NCTD, concerning entries in List II and List III, is subject to the executive power expressly conferred upon the Union by the Constitution or through legislation enacted by Parliament.

The judgment, delivered by a Constitution Bench comprising Chief Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Justice MR Shah, Justice Krishna Murari, Justice Hima Kohli, and Justice Pami Sri Narasimha, recognized the unique status of NCTD among Union Territories, distinguishing it from other Union Territories in terms of governance structure.

The Court further elaborated that NCTD possesses legislative and executive powers within its legislative competence, allowing it to enact laws and make rules related to "Services" under Entry 41 of List II of the Seventh Schedule. However, it clarified that the phrase "insofar as any such matter is applicable to Union Territories" in Article 239AA(3)(a) of the Constitution does not further exclude NCTD's legislative power over entries in the State List or Concurrent List.

Highlighting the division of administrative powers between the Union and NCTD, the Court emphasized that the executive power of NCTD with respect to entries in List II and List III shall be subject to the executive power expressly conferred upon the Union by the Constitution or through legislation enacted by Parliament.

The ruling provides clarity on the relationship between the Lieutenant Governor and the Council of Ministers in the context of NCTD's legislative and executive authority, setting an important precedent for future governance and decision-making processes in the capital territory.

The judgment lays down a comprehensive framework for the exercise of legislative and executive powers in NCTD, ensuring a balance between the Union and NCTD while respecting the constitutional principles and provisions. It marks a significant milestone in defining the governance structure of NCTD and the scope of its powers.

The Supreme Court's decision is expected to have far-reaching implications for the functioning and autonomy of NCTD, reaffirming the importance of a harmonious relationship between the Lieutenant Governor and the Council of Ministers in matters of legislation and decision-making.

The Court concluded its judgment by referring the papers of the case to the Regular Bench for further disposal, following the directions of the Chief Justice of India on the administrative side.

Case Title: Government of NCT of Delhi Vs UOI 

Date of Decision: May 11, 2023

Latest Legal News