138 NI Act | Admission Of Signatures On Cheque Triggers Statutory Presumption Of Debt: Punjab & Haryana HC Magistrate Cannot Straightaway Issue NBW For Non-Appearance If Accused Is Already On Bail; Bail Valid Until Cancelled: Orissa High Court Bank Cannot Dishonour Cheques Merely Because Account Title Changed From Partnership To Proprietorship: Madhya Pradesh High Court Environmental Clearance Is Site-Specific; Violations At Different Site By Related Entity Not Ground To Deny New EC: Kerala High Court Advocate’s Failure To Formally Prove Fee Bill Not Fatal To Claim If Oral Evidence Establishes Non-Payment Of Agreed Professional Fees: Delhi High Court Police Officers Cannot Fight Over Specific Postings; Disciplined Force Must Prioritize Public Interest Over Location: Karnataka High Court RERA Section 18 Interest For Delayed Possession Is An Unqualified Absolute Right; Notice Under Section 55 Contract Act Not Required: Bombay High Court State Cannot Hand Over Additional Charge Of Sensitive Posts To Tainted Officers Facing Disciplinary Action: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mandatory Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Essential If Accused Resides Outside Jurisdiction; Commercial Breach Not Criminal Offence: Calcutta High Court Disciplinary Enquiry Cannot Be Quashed Merely For Delay In Conclusion; 6-Month Timeline Under G.O.Ms.No.679 Is Directory: Andhra Pradesh High Court Exoneration In Adjudication Proceedings No Bar To Criminal Prosecution If CBI Collects Independent Evidence Of Forgery & Conspiracy: Bombay High Court Public Prosecutor Not A 'Post Office' Of Investigating Agency; Independent Application Of Mind Mandatory For Extending Remand Beyond 180 Days Under NDPS Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Complainant Cannot Use Section 311 CrPC To Reopen Pre-Charge Stage After Explicit Waiver & Framing Of Charges: Allahabad High Court Bomb Blast In Train Is An 'Accident' Under Railways Act, Union Of India Liable To Pay Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Bail Hearing Can Proceed In Informant's Absence If Notice Was Served Despite Section 483(2) BNSS Mandate: Allahabad High Court

Lieutenant Governor of NCT Delhi Bound by Aid and Advice of Council of Ministers in Legislative Matters: Supreme Court

03 September 2024 10:18 AM

By: Admin


Today on 11 May 2023, in a significant ruling, the Supreme Court held that the Lieutenant Governor of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) is bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers of NCTD in matters within the legislative scope of NCTD, particularly in relation to services. The Court clarified that the executive power of NCTD, concerning entries in List II and List III, is subject to the executive power expressly conferred upon the Union by the Constitution or through legislation enacted by Parliament.

The judgment, delivered by a Constitution Bench comprising Chief Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Justice MR Shah, Justice Krishna Murari, Justice Hima Kohli, and Justice Pami Sri Narasimha, recognized the unique status of NCTD among Union Territories, distinguishing it from other Union Territories in terms of governance structure.

The Court further elaborated that NCTD possesses legislative and executive powers within its legislative competence, allowing it to enact laws and make rules related to "Services" under Entry 41 of List II of the Seventh Schedule. However, it clarified that the phrase "insofar as any such matter is applicable to Union Territories" in Article 239AA(3)(a) of the Constitution does not further exclude NCTD's legislative power over entries in the State List or Concurrent List.

Highlighting the division of administrative powers between the Union and NCTD, the Court emphasized that the executive power of NCTD with respect to entries in List II and List III shall be subject to the executive power expressly conferred upon the Union by the Constitution or through legislation enacted by Parliament.

The ruling provides clarity on the relationship between the Lieutenant Governor and the Council of Ministers in the context of NCTD's legislative and executive authority, setting an important precedent for future governance and decision-making processes in the capital territory.

The judgment lays down a comprehensive framework for the exercise of legislative and executive powers in NCTD, ensuring a balance between the Union and NCTD while respecting the constitutional principles and provisions. It marks a significant milestone in defining the governance structure of NCTD and the scope of its powers.

The Supreme Court's decision is expected to have far-reaching implications for the functioning and autonomy of NCTD, reaffirming the importance of a harmonious relationship between the Lieutenant Governor and the Council of Ministers in matters of legislation and decision-making.

The Court concluded its judgment by referring the papers of the case to the Regular Bench for further disposal, following the directions of the Chief Justice of India on the administrative side.

Case Title: Government of NCT of Delhi Vs UOI 

Date of Decision: May 11, 2023

Latest Legal News