Court Must Conduct Inquiry on Mental Competency Before Appointing Legal Guardian - Punjab and Haryana High Court Right to Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due to the Sentiments of Society: Kerala High Court Grants Bail in Eve Teasing Case Supreme Court Extends Probation to 70-Year-Old in Decades-Old Family Feud Case Authorized Railway Agents Cannot Be Criminally Prosecuted for Unauthorized Procurement And Supply Of Railway Tickets: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Arbitrarily: Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Accused For Valid Arbitration Agreement and Party Consent Necessary: Supreme Court Declares Ex-Parte Arbitration Awards Null and Void NDPS | Lack of Homogeneous Mixing, Inventory Preparation, and Magistrate Certification Fatal to Prosecution's Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court "May Means May, and Shall Means Shall": Supreme Court Clarifies Appellate Court's Discretion Under Section 148 of NI Act Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Re-Evaluation of Coal Block Tender, Cites Concerns Over Arbitrary Disqualification Dying Declarations Must Be Beyond Doubt to Sustain Convictions: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Burn Injury Murder Case No Legally Enforceable Debt Proven: Madras High Court Dismisses Petition for Special Leave to Appeal in Cheque Bounce Case Decisional Autonomy is a Core Part of the Right to Privacy : Kerala High Court Upholds LGBTQ+ Rights in Landmark Habeas Corpus Case Consent of a Minor Is No Defense Under the POCSO Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Well-Known Marks Demand Special Protection: Delhi HC Cancels Conflicting Trademark for RPG Industrial Products High Court Acquits Accused Due to ‘Golden Thread’ Principle: Gaps in Medical Evidence and Unexplained Time Frame Prove Decisive Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown; Awards ₹12 Crore Permanent Alimony Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Maintenance Must Reflect Financial Realities and Social Standards: Madhya Pradesh High Court Upholds Interim Maintenance in Domestic Violence Land Classified as Agricultural Not Automatically Exempt from SARFAESI Proceedings: High Court Permissive Use Cannot Ripen into Right of Prescriptive Easement: Kerala High Court High Court Slams Procedural Delays, Orders FSL Report in Assault Case to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice Petitioner Did Not Endorse Part-Payments on Cheque; Section 138 NI Act Not Attracted: Madras High Court Minority Christian Schools Not Bound by Rules of 2018; Disciplinary Proceedings Can Continue: High Court of Calcutta Lack of Independent Witnesses Undermines Prosecution: Madras High Court Reaffirms Acquittal in SCST Case Proceedings Before Tribunal Are Summary in Nature and It Need Not Be Conducted Like Civil Suits: Kerala High Court Affirms Award in Accident Claim Affidavit Not Sufficient to Transfer Title Punjab and Haryana High Court

Lieutenant Governor of NCT Delhi Bound by Aid and Advice of Council of Ministers in Legislative Matters: Supreme Court

03 September 2024 10:18 AM

By: Admin


Today on 11 May 2023, in a significant ruling, the Supreme Court held that the Lieutenant Governor of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) is bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers of NCTD in matters within the legislative scope of NCTD, particularly in relation to services. The Court clarified that the executive power of NCTD, concerning entries in List II and List III, is subject to the executive power expressly conferred upon the Union by the Constitution or through legislation enacted by Parliament.

The judgment, delivered by a Constitution Bench comprising Chief Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Justice MR Shah, Justice Krishna Murari, Justice Hima Kohli, and Justice Pami Sri Narasimha, recognized the unique status of NCTD among Union Territories, distinguishing it from other Union Territories in terms of governance structure.

The Court further elaborated that NCTD possesses legislative and executive powers within its legislative competence, allowing it to enact laws and make rules related to "Services" under Entry 41 of List II of the Seventh Schedule. However, it clarified that the phrase "insofar as any such matter is applicable to Union Territories" in Article 239AA(3)(a) of the Constitution does not further exclude NCTD's legislative power over entries in the State List or Concurrent List.

Highlighting the division of administrative powers between the Union and NCTD, the Court emphasized that the executive power of NCTD with respect to entries in List II and List III shall be subject to the executive power expressly conferred upon the Union by the Constitution or through legislation enacted by Parliament.

The ruling provides clarity on the relationship between the Lieutenant Governor and the Council of Ministers in the context of NCTD's legislative and executive authority, setting an important precedent for future governance and decision-making processes in the capital territory.

The judgment lays down a comprehensive framework for the exercise of legislative and executive powers in NCTD, ensuring a balance between the Union and NCTD while respecting the constitutional principles and provisions. It marks a significant milestone in defining the governance structure of NCTD and the scope of its powers.

The Supreme Court's decision is expected to have far-reaching implications for the functioning and autonomy of NCTD, reaffirming the importance of a harmonious relationship between the Lieutenant Governor and the Council of Ministers in matters of legislation and decision-making.

The Court concluded its judgment by referring the papers of the case to the Regular Bench for further disposal, following the directions of the Chief Justice of India on the administrative side.

Case Title: Government of NCT of Delhi Vs UOI 

Date of Decision: May 11, 2023

Similar News