Mere Entry, Abuse Or Assault Is Not Civil Contempt – Willfulness And Dispossession Must Be Clearly Proved: Bombay High Court Magistrate Cannot Shut Eyes To Final Report After Cognizance – Supplementary Report Must Be Judicially Considered Before Framing Charges: Allahabad High Court Examination-in-Chief Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction Amid Serious Doubts: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Cannot Reclaim Absolute Ownership After Letting Your Declaration Suit Fail: AP High Court Enforces Finality in Partition Appeal Death Due to Fat Embolism and Delayed Treatment Is Not Culpable Homicide: Orissa High Court Converts 30-Year-Old 304 Part-I Conviction to Grievous Hurt Fabricated Lease Cannot Be Sanctified by Consolidation Entry: Orissa High Court Dismisses 36-Year-Old Second Appeal Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization

Land Acquisition Compensation Methodology Revisited by Supreme Court: Deductions for Development Charges Clarified

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has revisited the methodology for determining compensation for acquired land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court clarified the approach to calculating deductions for development charges and highlighted the importance of uniform valuation. The judgment, rendered by a bench comprising of [Insert Names of Judges], aims to ensure fair and just compensation for landowners affected by acquisition.

"Uniform valuation based on the Central Land Use Certificate (CLU) certificate and the developed nature of the land is essential for equitable compensation determination."

The subject of the case revolved around the determination of compensation for land covered by Section 4(1) Notification issued under the Land Acquisition Act. The appellants contested the compensation awarded by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, emphasizing the potential of the acquired land due to its proximity to industrial complexes and highways.

The Court, in its ruling, observed, "Proper deduction for development charges is pivotal for accurate valuation of the acquired land." It highlighted the significance of utilizing sale exemplars that closely mirror the size, location, and neighborhood of the acquired land. The judgment emphasized the need to calculate incremental value while factoring in the appropriate deduction for development charges.

One of the key takeaways from the ruling was the Court's rejection of the belting system in favor of a uniform valuation approach. The Court stated, "Uniform valuation, based on the Central Land Use Certificate (CLU) certificate and the developed nature of the land, is essential for equitable compensation determination."

The Supreme Court, while allowing the appeals in part, determined the market value for the acquired lands at Rs. 1,49,14,975 per acre. The ruling underscored the importance of clear and reasoned deduction percentages for development charges. The Court also directed all concerned authorities to strictly adhere to the principles laid down in the judgment, ensuring fair compensation for landowners within the specified timeframe.

Date of Decision: 23 August 2023

BESCO LIMITED vs STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS   

Latest Legal News