Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Land Acquisition Compensation Methodology Revisited by Supreme Court: Deductions for Development Charges Clarified

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has revisited the methodology for determining compensation for acquired land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court clarified the approach to calculating deductions for development charges and highlighted the importance of uniform valuation. The judgment, rendered by a bench comprising of [Insert Names of Judges], aims to ensure fair and just compensation for landowners affected by acquisition.

"Uniform valuation based on the Central Land Use Certificate (CLU) certificate and the developed nature of the land is essential for equitable compensation determination."

The subject of the case revolved around the determination of compensation for land covered by Section 4(1) Notification issued under the Land Acquisition Act. The appellants contested the compensation awarded by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, emphasizing the potential of the acquired land due to its proximity to industrial complexes and highways.

The Court, in its ruling, observed, "Proper deduction for development charges is pivotal for accurate valuation of the acquired land." It highlighted the significance of utilizing sale exemplars that closely mirror the size, location, and neighborhood of the acquired land. The judgment emphasized the need to calculate incremental value while factoring in the appropriate deduction for development charges.

One of the key takeaways from the ruling was the Court's rejection of the belting system in favor of a uniform valuation approach. The Court stated, "Uniform valuation, based on the Central Land Use Certificate (CLU) certificate and the developed nature of the land, is essential for equitable compensation determination."

The Supreme Court, while allowing the appeals in part, determined the market value for the acquired lands at Rs. 1,49,14,975 per acre. The ruling underscored the importance of clear and reasoned deduction percentages for development charges. The Court also directed all concerned authorities to strictly adhere to the principles laid down in the judgment, ensuring fair compensation for landowners within the specified timeframe.

Date of Decision: 23 August 2023

BESCO LIMITED vs STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS   

Latest Legal News