TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

Lack of Central Government-Recognized Laboratory Analysis Leads to Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam has acquitted a defendant in a food adulteration case due to a critical deficiency in laboratory analysis. The judgment, delivered on October 30, 2023, underscores the necessity of conducting analyses in laboratories recognized by the Central Government, as mandated by Section 23(1-A)(ee) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The revision petition, which challenged the legality, propriety, and regularity of judgments in Crl.A. No.126/2003 by the Appellate Court and S.T.C.No.474/1997 by the Trial Court, revolved around allegations of selling adulterated banana chips. The Prosecution relied on an analysis report from a Public Analyst to establish the presence of prohibited substances in the product.

In a significant observation, the Court emphasized the importance of the analysis procedure, stating, "Due to the non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of analysis in a recognized laboratory, the prosecution fails." This ruling reaffirms the Supreme Court's position that analysis reports must be obtained from laboratories defined under Section 23(1-A)(ee) of the Act for a successful prosecution.

The Counsel for the revision petitioner argued in line with Supreme Court judgments, asserting that without such analysis, the prosecution would inevitably fail. The Court's decision has far-reaching implications for food adulteration cases and emphasizes the need for strict adherence to legal procedures.

However, the Public Prosecutor contended that Public Analysts, appointed under Section 8 of the Act, make the Supreme Court's judgment inapplicable to this case. This disagreement with the previous Supreme Court ruling formed a crucial aspect of the legal debate.

The judgment ultimately resulted in the acquittal of the revision petitioner, with the Court setting aside the impugned judgments below. This case serves as a significant legal precedent, highlighting the importance of proper laboratory analysis in food adulteration cases and clarifying the consequences of non-compliance with statutory requirements.

Date of Decision: 30 October 2023

K.ABDUL RASHEED VS STATE OF KERALA   

Latest Legal News