Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Lack of Central Government-Recognized Laboratory Analysis Leads to Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam has acquitted a defendant in a food adulteration case due to a critical deficiency in laboratory analysis. The judgment, delivered on October 30, 2023, underscores the necessity of conducting analyses in laboratories recognized by the Central Government, as mandated by Section 23(1-A)(ee) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The revision petition, which challenged the legality, propriety, and regularity of judgments in Crl.A. No.126/2003 by the Appellate Court and S.T.C.No.474/1997 by the Trial Court, revolved around allegations of selling adulterated banana chips. The Prosecution relied on an analysis report from a Public Analyst to establish the presence of prohibited substances in the product.

In a significant observation, the Court emphasized the importance of the analysis procedure, stating, "Due to the non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of analysis in a recognized laboratory, the prosecution fails." This ruling reaffirms the Supreme Court's position that analysis reports must be obtained from laboratories defined under Section 23(1-A)(ee) of the Act for a successful prosecution.

The Counsel for the revision petitioner argued in line with Supreme Court judgments, asserting that without such analysis, the prosecution would inevitably fail. The Court's decision has far-reaching implications for food adulteration cases and emphasizes the need for strict adherence to legal procedures.

However, the Public Prosecutor contended that Public Analysts, appointed under Section 8 of the Act, make the Supreme Court's judgment inapplicable to this case. This disagreement with the previous Supreme Court ruling formed a crucial aspect of the legal debate.

The judgment ultimately resulted in the acquittal of the revision petitioner, with the Court setting aside the impugned judgments below. This case serves as a significant legal precedent, highlighting the importance of proper laboratory analysis in food adulteration cases and clarifying the consequences of non-compliance with statutory requirements.

Date of Decision: 30 October 2023

K.ABDUL RASHEED VS STATE OF KERALA   

Latest Legal News