Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

Lack of Central Government-Recognized Laboratory Analysis Leads to Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam has acquitted a defendant in a food adulteration case due to a critical deficiency in laboratory analysis. The judgment, delivered on October 30, 2023, underscores the necessity of conducting analyses in laboratories recognized by the Central Government, as mandated by Section 23(1-A)(ee) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The revision petition, which challenged the legality, propriety, and regularity of judgments in Crl.A. No.126/2003 by the Appellate Court and S.T.C.No.474/1997 by the Trial Court, revolved around allegations of selling adulterated banana chips. The Prosecution relied on an analysis report from a Public Analyst to establish the presence of prohibited substances in the product.

In a significant observation, the Court emphasized the importance of the analysis procedure, stating, "Due to the non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of analysis in a recognized laboratory, the prosecution fails." This ruling reaffirms the Supreme Court's position that analysis reports must be obtained from laboratories defined under Section 23(1-A)(ee) of the Act for a successful prosecution.

The Counsel for the revision petitioner argued in line with Supreme Court judgments, asserting that without such analysis, the prosecution would inevitably fail. The Court's decision has far-reaching implications for food adulteration cases and emphasizes the need for strict adherence to legal procedures.

However, the Public Prosecutor contended that Public Analysts, appointed under Section 8 of the Act, make the Supreme Court's judgment inapplicable to this case. This disagreement with the previous Supreme Court ruling formed a crucial aspect of the legal debate.

The judgment ultimately resulted in the acquittal of the revision petitioner, with the Court setting aside the impugned judgments below. This case serves as a significant legal precedent, highlighting the importance of proper laboratory analysis in food adulteration cases and clarifying the consequences of non-compliance with statutory requirements.

Date of Decision: 30 October 2023

K.ABDUL RASHEED VS STATE OF KERALA   

Latest Legal News