Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Kerala High Court Quashes Charges In POSCO Case – Ends of Justice Demand Compromise

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Kerala High Court, presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice Gopinath P., has quashed charges against an accused individual, marking a significant development in the legal landscape. The judgment, delivered on December 21, 2023, has garnered attention for its profound observations on the importance of justice, compromise, and the well-being of those involved.

The case revolved around allegations against the petitioner, who had been charged under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (Amended), 2012, 2019. The allegations included sexual abuse and the withdrawal from a proposed marriage.

The court, in its observations, stated, “There is yet another category of cases where though the victim alleged that the sexual assault or rape was forceful or against her will, later, they settled the dispute, got married, and led a peaceful life. Allowing prosecution to continue in those cases would only result in the disturbance of their happy family life.”

The court emphasized that the key factor in such cases is ensuring that the compromise is voluntary and in the best interest of the individuals involved. It further stated, “The court must consider whether the allegations prima facie constitute the ingredients of the offense, whether the settlement is in the best interest of the minor victim, and whether the continuance of the proceedings against the accused and the participation of the minor victim in that proceedings would adversely affect the mental, physical, and emotional well-being of the latter.”

Notably, the court referred to a previous judgment in Vishnu v. State of Kerala [2023 (4) KHC 1], which played a pivotal role in shaping the court’s decision in this case.

In the present case, the petitioner and the victim had not only settled their dispute but had also solemnized their marriage, which was a significant development during the course of the proceedings.

Taking into account all these factors, the court exercised its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) and quashed all further proceedings against the petitioner in Crime No.622 of 2023.

Date of Decision: December 21, 2023

XXXXXXXXXX VS  STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News