Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Kerala High Court Quashes Charges In POSCO Case – Ends of Justice Demand Compromise

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Kerala High Court, presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice Gopinath P., has quashed charges against an accused individual, marking a significant development in the legal landscape. The judgment, delivered on December 21, 2023, has garnered attention for its profound observations on the importance of justice, compromise, and the well-being of those involved.

The case revolved around allegations against the petitioner, who had been charged under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (Amended), 2012, 2019. The allegations included sexual abuse and the withdrawal from a proposed marriage.

The court, in its observations, stated, “There is yet another category of cases where though the victim alleged that the sexual assault or rape was forceful or against her will, later, they settled the dispute, got married, and led a peaceful life. Allowing prosecution to continue in those cases would only result in the disturbance of their happy family life.”

The court emphasized that the key factor in such cases is ensuring that the compromise is voluntary and in the best interest of the individuals involved. It further stated, “The court must consider whether the allegations prima facie constitute the ingredients of the offense, whether the settlement is in the best interest of the minor victim, and whether the continuance of the proceedings against the accused and the participation of the minor victim in that proceedings would adversely affect the mental, physical, and emotional well-being of the latter.”

Notably, the court referred to a previous judgment in Vishnu v. State of Kerala [2023 (4) KHC 1], which played a pivotal role in shaping the court’s decision in this case.

In the present case, the petitioner and the victim had not only settled their dispute but had also solemnized their marriage, which was a significant development during the course of the proceedings.

Taking into account all these factors, the court exercised its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) and quashed all further proceedings against the petitioner in Crime No.622 of 2023.

Date of Decision: December 21, 2023

XXXXXXXXXX VS  STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News