Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Kerala High Court Grants Conditional Release of Seized Currency Notes of Rs. 47 Lakh in Disproportionate Wealth Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal decision, the Kerala High Court, led by Justice Mr. Ziyad Rahman A.A., has granted conditional release of seized currency notes in a case involving allegations of amassing wealth disproportionate to known sources of income. The judgment, delivered on October 10, 2023, sets a precedent for the preservation of property seized during ongoing investigations.

The petitioner, K.M. Shaji, a politician, faced accusations of accumulating wealth beyond his declared income. The case, which initiated with a complaint filed by M.R. Harish, triggered a preliminary inquiry by the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau Special Cell, Kozhikode. Subsequently, a case was registered against Shaji under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

During the investigation, a search of Shaji's residence led to the seizure of currency notes worth Rs. 47,35,500. The petitioner filed an application under Section 451 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C) seeking the release of the seized amount, providing an explanation for its source.

The judgment meticulously examined the petitioner's contentions and the objections raised by the authorities. It found several discrepancies in the explanations offered by Shaji and raised doubts about the authenticity of the receipts produced by him.

Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. emphasized the purpose of Section 451 Cr.P.C, which pertains to the interim custody of seized articles during an ongoing trial. The court stated, "The order to be passed under Section 451 Cr.P.C is only intended to make a provisional arrangement with regard to the interim custody of the articles seized during the pendency of the trial. The purpose of such an order is to protect and preserve the property during the pendency of the trial."

The judgment referenced Supreme Court and Kerala High Court decisions to highlight the need to balance the rights of the State and the accused in such cases. It stressed the importance of preserving the wealth allegedly amassed disproportionately while ensuring the accused's rights are not unduly curtailed based on unproven accusations.

Consequently, the Kerala High Court granted conditional release of the seized amount to Shaji. The conditions include executing a bond for the amount with two solvent sureties and providing a bank guarantee from a nationalized bank. The bank guarantee must remain valid until the completion of the investigation and, if applicable, the trial.

The court clarified that its findings in this order should not prejudice Shaji during the ongoing investigation and trial. The judgment sets a precedent for cases involving the release of seized property during investigations, emphasizing the need to preserve assets while protecting the rights of the accused.

Date of Decision: 10.10.2023.

K.M.Shaji vs State of Kerala and ors

Similar News