Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Kerala High Court Grants Conditional Release of Seized Currency Notes of Rs. 47 Lakh in Disproportionate Wealth Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal decision, the Kerala High Court, led by Justice Mr. Ziyad Rahman A.A., has granted conditional release of seized currency notes in a case involving allegations of amassing wealth disproportionate to known sources of income. The judgment, delivered on October 10, 2023, sets a precedent for the preservation of property seized during ongoing investigations.

The petitioner, K.M. Shaji, a politician, faced accusations of accumulating wealth beyond his declared income. The case, which initiated with a complaint filed by M.R. Harish, triggered a preliminary inquiry by the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau Special Cell, Kozhikode. Subsequently, a case was registered against Shaji under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

During the investigation, a search of Shaji's residence led to the seizure of currency notes worth Rs. 47,35,500. The petitioner filed an application under Section 451 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C) seeking the release of the seized amount, providing an explanation for its source.

The judgment meticulously examined the petitioner's contentions and the objections raised by the authorities. It found several discrepancies in the explanations offered by Shaji and raised doubts about the authenticity of the receipts produced by him.

Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. emphasized the purpose of Section 451 Cr.P.C, which pertains to the interim custody of seized articles during an ongoing trial. The court stated, "The order to be passed under Section 451 Cr.P.C is only intended to make a provisional arrangement with regard to the interim custody of the articles seized during the pendency of the trial. The purpose of such an order is to protect and preserve the property during the pendency of the trial."

The judgment referenced Supreme Court and Kerala High Court decisions to highlight the need to balance the rights of the State and the accused in such cases. It stressed the importance of preserving the wealth allegedly amassed disproportionately while ensuring the accused's rights are not unduly curtailed based on unproven accusations.

Consequently, the Kerala High Court granted conditional release of the seized amount to Shaji. The conditions include executing a bond for the amount with two solvent sureties and providing a bank guarantee from a nationalized bank. The bank guarantee must remain valid until the completion of the investigation and, if applicable, the trial.

The court clarified that its findings in this order should not prejudice Shaji during the ongoing investigation and trial. The judgment sets a precedent for cases involving the release of seized property during investigations, emphasizing the need to preserve assets while protecting the rights of the accused.

Date of Decision: 10.10.2023.

K.M.Shaji vs State of Kerala and ors

Latest Legal News