District Judiciary Retirement Age | Supreme Court Directs Enhancement To 62 Years To Arrest Attrition Of Judicial Talent Slogans Inciting Armed Rebellion Or Challenging Sovereignty Cannot Be Equated With Religious Expressions: Allahabad High Court Denies Bail Revisional Authority Under AP ROR Act Has Jurisdiction To Direct Inquiry Into Illegal Transfers Of Assigned Land: Andhra Pradesh High Court Indian Law Does Not Recognise 'Joint Parenting' As A Statutory Concept; Child Welfare Remains Paramount: Bombay High Court Order 26 Rule 9 CPC | Court Must Appoint Survey-Knowing Commissioner In Suits Alleging Physical Encroachment And Boundary Disputes: Calcutta High Court Section 33-C(2) ID Act | Labour Court Has Jurisdiction To Recover Consequential Benefits Arising From CAT Orders: Delhi High Court Order VIII Rule 1-A(3) CPC | Procedural Law Is Meant For Advancement Of Justice; Technicalities Should Not Scuttle Opportunity To Lead Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court High Court Can Condition Condonation Of Delay In Land Acquisition Appeals Upon Waiver Of Interest For Delayed Period: Bombay High Court Employees Compensation Act | Insurance Company Not Liable To Indemnify Penalty Imposed On Employer Under Section 4-A(3)(b): Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees’ Compensation Act | Failure To Frame Issue On Employer-Employee Relationship Vitiates Commissioner’s Award: Kerala High Court Default Bail Under Section 187 BNSS | Period Of Investigation Depends On Substance Of Allegations In FIR, Not Merely Mentioned Sections: Madhya Pradesh High Court SARFAESI Act | Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Must Be Challenged Under Section 17 Before DRT, Not Via Writ Petition: Kerala High Court

Kerala High Court Grants Conditional Release of Seized Currency Notes of Rs. 47 Lakh in Disproportionate Wealth Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal decision, the Kerala High Court, led by Justice Mr. Ziyad Rahman A.A., has granted conditional release of seized currency notes in a case involving allegations of amassing wealth disproportionate to known sources of income. The judgment, delivered on October 10, 2023, sets a precedent for the preservation of property seized during ongoing investigations.

The petitioner, K.M. Shaji, a politician, faced accusations of accumulating wealth beyond his declared income. The case, which initiated with a complaint filed by M.R. Harish, triggered a preliminary inquiry by the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau Special Cell, Kozhikode. Subsequently, a case was registered against Shaji under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

During the investigation, a search of Shaji's residence led to the seizure of currency notes worth Rs. 47,35,500. The petitioner filed an application under Section 451 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C) seeking the release of the seized amount, providing an explanation for its source.

The judgment meticulously examined the petitioner's contentions and the objections raised by the authorities. It found several discrepancies in the explanations offered by Shaji and raised doubts about the authenticity of the receipts produced by him.

Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. emphasized the purpose of Section 451 Cr.P.C, which pertains to the interim custody of seized articles during an ongoing trial. The court stated, "The order to be passed under Section 451 Cr.P.C is only intended to make a provisional arrangement with regard to the interim custody of the articles seized during the pendency of the trial. The purpose of such an order is to protect and preserve the property during the pendency of the trial."

The judgment referenced Supreme Court and Kerala High Court decisions to highlight the need to balance the rights of the State and the accused in such cases. It stressed the importance of preserving the wealth allegedly amassed disproportionately while ensuring the accused's rights are not unduly curtailed based on unproven accusations.

Consequently, the Kerala High Court granted conditional release of the seized amount to Shaji. The conditions include executing a bond for the amount with two solvent sureties and providing a bank guarantee from a nationalized bank. The bank guarantee must remain valid until the completion of the investigation and, if applicable, the trial.

The court clarified that its findings in this order should not prejudice Shaji during the ongoing investigation and trial. The judgment sets a precedent for cases involving the release of seized property during investigations, emphasizing the need to preserve assets while protecting the rights of the accused.

Date of Decision: 10.10.2023.

K.M.Shaji vs State of Kerala and ors

Latest Legal News