Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Kerala High Court Grants Conditional Release of Seized Currency Notes of Rs. 47 Lakh in Disproportionate Wealth Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal decision, the Kerala High Court, led by Justice Mr. Ziyad Rahman A.A., has granted conditional release of seized currency notes in a case involving allegations of amassing wealth disproportionate to known sources of income. The judgment, delivered on October 10, 2023, sets a precedent for the preservation of property seized during ongoing investigations.

The petitioner, K.M. Shaji, a politician, faced accusations of accumulating wealth beyond his declared income. The case, which initiated with a complaint filed by M.R. Harish, triggered a preliminary inquiry by the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau Special Cell, Kozhikode. Subsequently, a case was registered against Shaji under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

During the investigation, a search of Shaji's residence led to the seizure of currency notes worth Rs. 47,35,500. The petitioner filed an application under Section 451 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C) seeking the release of the seized amount, providing an explanation for its source.

The judgment meticulously examined the petitioner's contentions and the objections raised by the authorities. It found several discrepancies in the explanations offered by Shaji and raised doubts about the authenticity of the receipts produced by him.

Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. emphasized the purpose of Section 451 Cr.P.C, which pertains to the interim custody of seized articles during an ongoing trial. The court stated, "The order to be passed under Section 451 Cr.P.C is only intended to make a provisional arrangement with regard to the interim custody of the articles seized during the pendency of the trial. The purpose of such an order is to protect and preserve the property during the pendency of the trial."

The judgment referenced Supreme Court and Kerala High Court decisions to highlight the need to balance the rights of the State and the accused in such cases. It stressed the importance of preserving the wealth allegedly amassed disproportionately while ensuring the accused's rights are not unduly curtailed based on unproven accusations.

Consequently, the Kerala High Court granted conditional release of the seized amount to Shaji. The conditions include executing a bond for the amount with two solvent sureties and providing a bank guarantee from a nationalized bank. The bank guarantee must remain valid until the completion of the investigation and, if applicable, the trial.

The court clarified that its findings in this order should not prejudice Shaji during the ongoing investigation and trial. The judgment sets a precedent for cases involving the release of seized property during investigations, emphasizing the need to preserve assets while protecting the rights of the accused.

Date of Decision: 10.10.2023.

K.M.Shaji vs State of Kerala and ors

Similar News