Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Kerala High Court Grants Conditional Release of Seized Currency Notes of Rs. 47 Lakh in Disproportionate Wealth Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal decision, the Kerala High Court, led by Justice Mr. Ziyad Rahman A.A., has granted conditional release of seized currency notes in a case involving allegations of amassing wealth disproportionate to known sources of income. The judgment, delivered on October 10, 2023, sets a precedent for the preservation of property seized during ongoing investigations.

The petitioner, K.M. Shaji, a politician, faced accusations of accumulating wealth beyond his declared income. The case, which initiated with a complaint filed by M.R. Harish, triggered a preliminary inquiry by the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau Special Cell, Kozhikode. Subsequently, a case was registered against Shaji under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

During the investigation, a search of Shaji's residence led to the seizure of currency notes worth Rs. 47,35,500. The petitioner filed an application under Section 451 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C) seeking the release of the seized amount, providing an explanation for its source.

The judgment meticulously examined the petitioner's contentions and the objections raised by the authorities. It found several discrepancies in the explanations offered by Shaji and raised doubts about the authenticity of the receipts produced by him.

Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. emphasized the purpose of Section 451 Cr.P.C, which pertains to the interim custody of seized articles during an ongoing trial. The court stated, "The order to be passed under Section 451 Cr.P.C is only intended to make a provisional arrangement with regard to the interim custody of the articles seized during the pendency of the trial. The purpose of such an order is to protect and preserve the property during the pendency of the trial."

The judgment referenced Supreme Court and Kerala High Court decisions to highlight the need to balance the rights of the State and the accused in such cases. It stressed the importance of preserving the wealth allegedly amassed disproportionately while ensuring the accused's rights are not unduly curtailed based on unproven accusations.

Consequently, the Kerala High Court granted conditional release of the seized amount to Shaji. The conditions include executing a bond for the amount with two solvent sureties and providing a bank guarantee from a nationalized bank. The bank guarantee must remain valid until the completion of the investigation and, if applicable, the trial.

The court clarified that its findings in this order should not prejudice Shaji during the ongoing investigation and trial. The judgment sets a precedent for cases involving the release of seized property during investigations, emphasizing the need to preserve assets while protecting the rights of the accused.

Date of Decision: 10.10.2023.

K.M.Shaji vs State of Kerala and ors

Latest Legal News