Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Kerala High Court Exemplifies Judicial Discretion in Delay Condonation”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Kerala High Court showcased the exercise of judicial discretion in condoning a delay of 25 days in filing a commercial appeal. The judgment, delivered by Justices ANIL K. NARENDRAN and SOPHY THOMAS on October 17, 2023, sets a notable precedent for cases involving delays in litigation.

The court began by acknowledging the delay and the appellant’s initial explanation for it, stating, “An application for condonation of delay should be drafted with careful concern and not in a haphazard manner harboring the notion that the courts are required to condone delay on the bedrock of the principle that adjudication of a lis on merits is seminal to justice dispensation system.”

The appellant, who was the defendant in a commercial suit, had initially faced skepticism regarding the reason given for the delay. However, the case took a pivotal turn when the appellant presented an additional affidavit along with evidence of his nine-month-old baby’s illness and other personal setbacks. The court observed, “The additional affidavit coupled with Annexure A1 discharge summary of a nine-month-old baby of the appellant during the relevant period, reasonably justifies the delay.”

The judgment exemplifies the delicate balance between adhering to the prescribed periods of limitation and the need to consider genuine reasons for delays. It underscores that while the purpose of the Commercial Courts Act is to ensure the speedy resolution of commercial disputes, a judicious application of discretion is essential.

To enforce accountability, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the appellant. The judgment serves as a reminder that delay condonation should not be taken lightly and should be backed by genuine justifications.

This ruling resonates with legal practitioners and stakeholders, emphasizing the importance of careful drafting in applications for delay condonation and the nuanced application of the law.

Date of Decision: 17 October 2023

MUHAMMEDSHAFEEK VS M/S. TASTY NUT INDUSTRIES,

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/15-Oct-2023-Mohamed-Vs-Tasty-Nuts-KerlHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News