Motor Insurance Policy Covers Cross-Border Travel If Specifically Authorized By Valid Permit Under MVA: Supreme Court Petrol Pumps Act As 'Commission Agents' For Mahanagar Gas, Liable To Pay Service Tax Under Business Auxiliary Service: Supreme Court Supreme Court Refuses To Dilute 'Bangalore Water Supply' Ratio, Affirms Worker Protection Remains The Core Of Industrial Disputes Act Order XXII Rule 9(3) CPC | Application Under Section 5 Limitation Act Must Be Filed Separately To Condonate Delay In Setting Aside Abatement: Supreme Court Principle Of Parity | Supreme Court Extends Benefit Of Fixed-Term Sentence To Co-Accused Based On Remission Period Right To Catch Fish Amounts To 'Profit à Prendre' And Is Compulsorily Registrable As A Lease Under Section 17(1)(d) Registration Act: Supreme Court Supreme Court Mandates Adoption Of Guidelines To Inculcate Sensitivity And Compassion In Judicial Processes For Sexual Offences 'Last Seen' Circumstance Is Weak Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused PSEB | Pre-Regularization Service Must Be Counted As Qualifying Service For Pensionary Benefits: Supreme Court Writ Of Quo Warranto Cannot Be Used For Redress Of Personal Grievances By Unsuccessful Candidates In Selection Process: Supreme Court 'Case Of No Investigation': Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused Citing 'Shoddy' Police Work And Lack Of Forensic Evidence 'Status Quo Cannot Be Vacated Without Appropriate Security': Supreme Court Directs Additional ₹200 Crores Deposit In RAKIA-Matrix Case SARFAESI Act | 'Bank' As Assignee Can Invoke Recovery Measures Even If Debt Was Originally Created By Non-Notified Financial Institution: Supreme Court 'CBI Failed Miserably': Supreme Court Tears Into 'Fabricated' Case, Acquits Bank Manager In 35-Year-Old Corruption Trial Mere Delay In Tax Deposit Cannot Be Equated With Non-Payment: Supreme Court Quashes Penalty On Saudi Arabian Airlines Revisional Power Under Section 56 Karnataka Land Revenue Act Cannot Be Invoked Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period: Supreme Court Prosecution Can’t Use Known Locations To Create 'Discovery' Fiction: Supreme Court Rejects Site Plan As Evidence Irretrievable Breakdown Of Marriage And Long-Term Separation Constitute Valid Grounds For Divorce Under Section 13(1)(ib) HMA: Supreme Court 'Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Is A Guideline And Not A Fetish': Supreme Court Acquits Man In 2007 Murder Case Over Fragile Circumstantial Evidence Plea Of Juvenility Is A Jurisdictional Fact; High Court Must Recall Final Judgments Under Section 482 CrPC To Remedy Miscarriage Of Justice: Supreme Court SEBI | Professional Clearing Members Have No Statutory Obligation To Verify Credit/Debit Positions Of Individual Clients Of Trading Members: Supreme Court

Kerala High Court Directs Bank to Disburse Education Loan Despite Low CIBIL Score

03 September 2024 10:25 AM

By: Admin


In a significant order, the Kerala High Court, under the jurisdiction of Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan, has directed the State Bank of India to sanction and disburse an education loan amounting to Rs. 4,07,200/- to a student, Noel Paul Fredy, despite a low CIBIL score. The court emphasized the importance of a humanitarian approach and considered the petitioner's job offer as compelling factors in its decision.

The court's order stemmed from a writ petition filed by the 23-year-old petitioner, seeking the court's intervention in enabling the bank to provide the education loan within a stipulated timeframe. The respondents, State Bank of India and its branch manager, had opposed any interim order, citing the petitioner's low CIBIL score and outstanding loans.

However, the court, taking into account previous judgments (Exts.P3 and P4), stated that the unsatisfactory credit scores of the petitioner's parents should not be the sole grounds for rejecting an educational loan. The court underscored that the repayment capacity of the petitioner after completing his education should be the decisive factor. It further asserted that a humanitarian approach is imperative when evaluating education loan applications, particularly considering that students are the future builders of the nation.

Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan, while acknowledging the legal contentions raised by the respondents, opined that the balance of convenience favored the petitioner. Notably, the petitioner had secured a job offer from a multinational company, further indicating the potential for loan repayment.

Court ordered the respondents to promptly disburse the education loan to the petitioner's college, emphasizing the need for immediate action. The court left all other contentions open, allowing the respondents to file a counter affidavit and a petition for early hearing, if required.

30th  May 2023

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN vs STATE BANK OF INDIA, MALIKAMPEEDIKA BRANCH

Latest Legal News