Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’ Article 21 Rights Not Absolute In Cases Threatening National Security: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted In Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case A Computer Programme That Solves a Technical Problem Is Not Barred Under Section 3(k): Madras High Court Allows Patent for Software-Based Data Lineage System Premature Auction Without 30-Day Redemption Violates Section 176 and Bank’s Own Terms: Orissa High Court Quashes Canara Bank’s Gold Loan Sale Courts Can’t Stall Climate-Resilient Public Projects: Madras High Court Lifts Status Quo on Eco Park, Pond Works at Race Club Land No Cross-Examination, No Conviction: Gujarat High Court Quashes Customs Penalty for Violating Principles of Natural Justice ITAT Was Wrong in Disregarding Statements Under Oath, But Additions Unsustainable Without Corroborative Evidence: Madras High Court Deduction Theory Under Old Land Acquisition Law Has No Place Under 2013 Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Compensation for Metro Land Acquisition UIT Cannot Turn Around After Issuing Pattas, It's Estopped Now: Rajasthan High Court Private Doctor’s Widow Eligible for COVID Insurance if Duty Proven: Supreme Court Rebukes Narrow Interpretation of COVID-Era Orders Smaller Benches Cannot Override Constitution Bench Authority Under The Guise Of Clarification: Supreme Court Criticises Judicial Indiscipline Public Premises Act, 1971 | PP Act Overrides State Rent Control Laws for All Tenancies; Suhas Pophale Overruled: Supreme Court Court Has No Power To Reduce Sentence Below Statutory Minimum Under NDPS Act: Supreme Court Denies Relief To Young Mother Convicted With 23.5 kg Ganja Non-Compliance With Section 52-A Is Not Per Se Fatal: Supreme Court Clarifies Law On Sampling Procedure Under NDPS Act MBA Degree Doesn’t Feed the Stomach: Delhi High Court Says Wife’s Qualification No Ground to Deny Maintenance

Kerala High Court Directs Bank to Disburse Education Loan Despite Low CIBIL Score

03 September 2024 10:25 AM

By: Admin


In a significant order, the Kerala High Court, under the jurisdiction of Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan, has directed the State Bank of India to sanction and disburse an education loan amounting to Rs. 4,07,200/- to a student, Noel Paul Fredy, despite a low CIBIL score. The court emphasized the importance of a humanitarian approach and considered the petitioner's job offer as compelling factors in its decision.

The court's order stemmed from a writ petition filed by the 23-year-old petitioner, seeking the court's intervention in enabling the bank to provide the education loan within a stipulated timeframe. The respondents, State Bank of India and its branch manager, had opposed any interim order, citing the petitioner's low CIBIL score and outstanding loans.

However, the court, taking into account previous judgments (Exts.P3 and P4), stated that the unsatisfactory credit scores of the petitioner's parents should not be the sole grounds for rejecting an educational loan. The court underscored that the repayment capacity of the petitioner after completing his education should be the decisive factor. It further asserted that a humanitarian approach is imperative when evaluating education loan applications, particularly considering that students are the future builders of the nation.

Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan, while acknowledging the legal contentions raised by the respondents, opined that the balance of convenience favored the petitioner. Notably, the petitioner had secured a job offer from a multinational company, further indicating the potential for loan repayment.

Court ordered the respondents to promptly disburse the education loan to the petitioner's college, emphasizing the need for immediate action. The court left all other contentions open, allowing the respondents to file a counter affidavit and a petition for early hearing, if required.

30th  May 2023

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN vs STATE BANK OF INDIA, MALIKAMPEEDIKA BRANCH

Latest Legal News