MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Kerala Conductors for Alleged Wrongful Restraint of Students: Emphasizes Equal Treatment for All Passengers

04 September 2024 10:57 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam has quashed the charges against three bus conductors who were accused of wrongfully restraining students from boarding their buses. The judgment, delivered by The Honorable Mr. Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan on 4th August 2023, sheds light on the need for equal treatment of students and other passengers while boarding buses.

The accused conductors faced charges under Section 190(2) read with Section 196 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (MV Act), alleging violation of standards related to road safety, noise control, and air pollution. However, Justice Kunhikrishnan, while examining the provisions, stated, "Prima facie a conductor of a bus will not come within the purview of the above section." He further added, "Simply because students were not allowed to board a bus, it cannot be treated as a violation of the standards prescribed in relation to road safety, control of noise, and air-pollution."

The judgment also emphasized the need for bus owners to address their grievances regarding student concessions with the government rather than resorting to discriminatory practices. "Students and other passengers are on an equal footing. It is the duty of the police to see that there is no law and order problem in connection with the same," remarked Justice Kunhikrishnan.

Highlighting the concerns over the prevalent practice of not allowing students to board buses, the court directed the State police chief to take appropriate actions to avert any potential law and order issues arising from disputes between students and bus employees at bus stands and stops.

The ruling comes as a significant step towards promoting fairness and equality in public transportation and sends a strong message about the importance of providing equal access to transportation services for all passengers.

As a result of the judgment, all proceedings against the accused in the cases have been quashed, with the court urging the state authorities to look into student concessions' current realities and consider the demands raised by bus owners in this regard.

D.D-4Aug.2023

SIRAJ vs STATE OF KERALA

Latest Legal News