MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT AFFIRMS VALIDITY OF ADOPTION IN ABSENCE OF REGISTERED DEED, EMPHASIZES FULFILLMENT OF CONDITIONS

04 September 2024 10:37 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Karnataka has affirmed the validity of an adoption despite the absence of a registered adoption deed. The court emphasized that the fulfillment of conditions laid out under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 is pivotal in establishing the legitimacy of an adoption. The judgment, delivered by the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shivashankar Amarannavar, sheds light on the importance of ceremonies, consent, and the effect of adoption on the status of the adopted child.

High court stated, “The Act does not require a registered adoption deed to validate an adoption. What matters is the act of adoption itself, accompanied by proper ceremonies and the fulfillment of statutory conditions.” The court further highlighted that the absence of an adoption deed does not invalidate the adoption if the essential conditions for a valid adoption are met.

The case cantered around a dispute over the adoption of a child by his maternal uncle. The defendants argued that the child had been legally adopted and presented oral evidence, such as witness testimony and a Will, to support their claim. However, the court found the evidence insufficient to establish the ceremonies of giving and taking the child, as well as the consent of both the natural and adoptive parents.

Regarding the presumption under Section 16 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, the court clarified that the provision applies only to registered adoption documents. The court emphasized that the presumption is not a requirement for a valid adoption and that oral evidence, when supported by fulfilling the necessary conditions, can establish the legitimacy of an adoption.

The judgment reaffirms the burden of proof in adoption disputes, placing the onus on the party asserting adoption to provide substantial evidence. In this case, the court dismissed the appeal filed by the defendants and upheld the trial court’s decision, which granted the plaintiff a 1/4th share in the suit schedule properties.

This ruling serves as a precedent, shedding light on the significance of proper ceremonies, consent, and fulfillment of conditions in validating adoptions, even in the absence of a registered adoption deed.

Date of Decision: 10th July 2023

N.L. MANJUNATHA  vs   B.L. ANANDA @ B.L

Latest Legal News