Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Successive FIRs Cannot Be Used to Thwart Bail: Supreme Court Invokes Article 32 to Protect Personal Liberty Supreme Court Enforces Contractual Bar Against Interest in Government Contracts Ex Parte Decree Not a Blank Cheque - Merely Because Defendant Absent, Plaintiff’s Case Not Presumed True: Madras High Court Mandatory Injunction Cannot Be Kept in Cold Storage: Supreme Court Enforces Strict Three-Year Limitation for Execution Senior Citizens Act Is for Maintenance, Not a Shortcut to Eviction: Calcutta High Court Restrains Tribunal’s Overreach Statement ‘Counsel Says’ Is Not a Binding Undertaking Without Client’s Specific Authorization: Allahabad High Court Declines to Initiate Contempt Rigours of Section 43-D(5) Melt Down When Liberty Is at Stake: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail in UAPA Case After 2.5 Years’ Custody Vakalatnama Is Not a Mere Form – Attestation Is a Legal Safeguard: Andhra Pradesh High Court Cautions Advocates and Registry on Procedural Sanctity Right to Be Considered for Promotion Is Fundamental – Employer’s Unfairness Cannot Defeat It: : Gujarat High Court Panchayat Statement Implicating Others Is Not a Confession Proper: J&K High Court Rejects Extra-Judicial Confession in Murder Appeal Contempt Lies Only on ‘Wilful and Deliberate Disobedience’ – Fresh KASP Appointments Not Replacement of Daily Wage Workers: Kerala High Court 498A Cannot Become a Dragnet for Entire Family: Orissa High Court Shields Distant In-Laws but Sends Husband to Trial

Just Having a Degree Not a Ground To Denie or Reduce Maintenance: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court has made a significant ruling affirming that merely holding a degree of graduation does not compel a wife to work for maintenance. The judgment was delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA on October 12, 2023.

The case involved an appeal against an order of enhancement of pendente lite maintenance, with the husband seeking a reduction in maintenance and the wife seeking further enhancement. The dispute primarily revolved around the husband's income and the wife's employment status.

The Court's observation that "No inference can be drawn that merely because the wife is holding a degree of graduation, she must be compelled to work" carries significant weight in emphasizing the principle of choice regarding a spouse's employment, especially in cases of maintenance.

The judgment also addressed the imposition of penalties for delays in maintenance payments. The Court found that the penalty imposed for delay in payment of interim maintenance exceeded the maintenance amount itself and, as such, set it aside. Instead, the Court directed that interest at 6% per annum should be paid to the wife for delayed maintenance payments.

This ruling underscores the importance of considering individual circumstances in matters of maintenance and recognizes that educational qualifications alone should not be used to compel a spouse, particularly the wife, into employment for the purpose of maintenance.

Date of Decision: 12 October  2023

ARVIND SINGH VS RAJNI AND ANR.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/12-Oct-23-Arvind-Vs-Rajni-DelHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News