Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Just Having a Degree Not a Ground To Denie or Reduce Maintenance: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court has made a significant ruling affirming that merely holding a degree of graduation does not compel a wife to work for maintenance. The judgment was delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA on October 12, 2023.

The case involved an appeal against an order of enhancement of pendente lite maintenance, with the husband seeking a reduction in maintenance and the wife seeking further enhancement. The dispute primarily revolved around the husband's income and the wife's employment status.

The Court's observation that "No inference can be drawn that merely because the wife is holding a degree of graduation, she must be compelled to work" carries significant weight in emphasizing the principle of choice regarding a spouse's employment, especially in cases of maintenance.

The judgment also addressed the imposition of penalties for delays in maintenance payments. The Court found that the penalty imposed for delay in payment of interim maintenance exceeded the maintenance amount itself and, as such, set it aside. Instead, the Court directed that interest at 6% per annum should be paid to the wife for delayed maintenance payments.

This ruling underscores the importance of considering individual circumstances in matters of maintenance and recognizes that educational qualifications alone should not be used to compel a spouse, particularly the wife, into employment for the purpose of maintenance.

Date of Decision: 12 October  2023

ARVIND SINGH VS RAJNI AND ANR.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/12-Oct-23-Arvind-Vs-Rajni-DelHC.pdf"]

Similar News