District Judiciary Retirement Age | Supreme Court Directs Enhancement To 62 Years To Arrest Attrition Of Judicial Talent Slogans Inciting Armed Rebellion Or Challenging Sovereignty Cannot Be Equated With Religious Expressions: Allahabad High Court Denies Bail Revisional Authority Under AP ROR Act Has Jurisdiction To Direct Inquiry Into Illegal Transfers Of Assigned Land: Andhra Pradesh High Court Indian Law Does Not Recognise 'Joint Parenting' As A Statutory Concept; Child Welfare Remains Paramount: Bombay High Court Order 26 Rule 9 CPC | Court Must Appoint Survey-Knowing Commissioner In Suits Alleging Physical Encroachment And Boundary Disputes: Calcutta High Court Section 33-C(2) ID Act | Labour Court Has Jurisdiction To Recover Consequential Benefits Arising From CAT Orders: Delhi High Court Order VIII Rule 1-A(3) CPC | Procedural Law Is Meant For Advancement Of Justice; Technicalities Should Not Scuttle Opportunity To Lead Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court High Court Can Condition Condonation Of Delay In Land Acquisition Appeals Upon Waiver Of Interest For Delayed Period: Bombay High Court Employees Compensation Act | Insurance Company Not Liable To Indemnify Penalty Imposed On Employer Under Section 4-A(3)(b): Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees’ Compensation Act | Failure To Frame Issue On Employer-Employee Relationship Vitiates Commissioner’s Award: Kerala High Court Default Bail Under Section 187 BNSS | Period Of Investigation Depends On Substance Of Allegations In FIR, Not Merely Mentioned Sections: Madhya Pradesh High Court SARFAESI Act | Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Must Be Challenged Under Section 17 Before DRT, Not Via Writ Petition: Kerala High Court

Just Having a Degree Not a Ground To Denie or Reduce Maintenance: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court has made a significant ruling affirming that merely holding a degree of graduation does not compel a wife to work for maintenance. The judgment was delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA on October 12, 2023.

The case involved an appeal against an order of enhancement of pendente lite maintenance, with the husband seeking a reduction in maintenance and the wife seeking further enhancement. The dispute primarily revolved around the husband's income and the wife's employment status.

The Court's observation that "No inference can be drawn that merely because the wife is holding a degree of graduation, she must be compelled to work" carries significant weight in emphasizing the principle of choice regarding a spouse's employment, especially in cases of maintenance.

The judgment also addressed the imposition of penalties for delays in maintenance payments. The Court found that the penalty imposed for delay in payment of interim maintenance exceeded the maintenance amount itself and, as such, set it aside. Instead, the Court directed that interest at 6% per annum should be paid to the wife for delayed maintenance payments.

This ruling underscores the importance of considering individual circumstances in matters of maintenance and recognizes that educational qualifications alone should not be used to compel a spouse, particularly the wife, into employment for the purpose of maintenance.

Date of Decision: 12 October  2023

ARVIND SINGH VS RAJNI AND ANR.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/12-Oct-23-Arvind-Vs-Rajni-DelHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News