Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Jurisdiction of Civil Court Not Barred Under SARFAESI Act: Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has set a significant precedent in a case involving the enforcement of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and the jurisdiction of civil courts under the SARFAESI Act. The bench, led by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth, pronounced its decision on 20th November 2023, in a case that has captured the attention of legal circles.

The court addressed a critical issue in the case between Ujjagar Construction Pvt. Ltd. And Nayati Healthcare and Research NCR Pvt. Ltd., regarding the applicability of the SARFAESI Act to civil suits. In its detailed judgment, the court observed, “Jurisdiction of civil court is plenary in nature, unless the same is ousted, expressly or by necessary implication, it will have jurisdiction to try all types of suits.” This statement has resonated across the legal community, highlighting the comprehensive authority of civil courts.

The dispute centered around a MOU for the purchase of land, with the plaintiff seeking specific performance and related injunctions. The court delved into the nuances of the SARFAESI Act and its impact on civil court jurisdiction, concluding that the civil suit’s maintainability was not barred by the SARFAESI Act.

Further, the court meticulously analyzed the principles for granting temporary injunctions. It concluded that the plaintiff’s case did not satisfy the essential criteria of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss or injury, leading to the rejection of the injunction plea.

Legal experts view this judgment as a crucial affirmation of the civil court’s jurisdiction in complex financial and property-related disputes. The decision clarifies the legal landscape around MOUs, specific performance suits, and the SARFAESI Act, offering a robust framework for future cases.

This ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications in legal proceedings involving SARFAESI Act and property disputes, as it reinforces the civil court’s comprehensive jurisdiction while emphasizing the need for a meticulous approach in granting injunctions in such matters.

Date of Decision: 20.11.2023

Ujjagar Construction Pvt. Ltd. VS Nayati Healthcare and Research NCR Pvt. Ltd.

 

Latest Legal News