CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Jurisdiction of Civil Court Not Barred Under SARFAESI Act: Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has set a significant precedent in a case involving the enforcement of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and the jurisdiction of civil courts under the SARFAESI Act. The bench, led by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth, pronounced its decision on 20th November 2023, in a case that has captured the attention of legal circles.

The court addressed a critical issue in the case between Ujjagar Construction Pvt. Ltd. And Nayati Healthcare and Research NCR Pvt. Ltd., regarding the applicability of the SARFAESI Act to civil suits. In its detailed judgment, the court observed, “Jurisdiction of civil court is plenary in nature, unless the same is ousted, expressly or by necessary implication, it will have jurisdiction to try all types of suits.” This statement has resonated across the legal community, highlighting the comprehensive authority of civil courts.

The dispute centered around a MOU for the purchase of land, with the plaintiff seeking specific performance and related injunctions. The court delved into the nuances of the SARFAESI Act and its impact on civil court jurisdiction, concluding that the civil suit’s maintainability was not barred by the SARFAESI Act.

Further, the court meticulously analyzed the principles for granting temporary injunctions. It concluded that the plaintiff’s case did not satisfy the essential criteria of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss or injury, leading to the rejection of the injunction plea.

Legal experts view this judgment as a crucial affirmation of the civil court’s jurisdiction in complex financial and property-related disputes. The decision clarifies the legal landscape around MOUs, specific performance suits, and the SARFAESI Act, offering a robust framework for future cases.

This ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications in legal proceedings involving SARFAESI Act and property disputes, as it reinforces the civil court’s comprehensive jurisdiction while emphasizing the need for a meticulous approach in granting injunctions in such matters.

Date of Decision: 20.11.2023

Ujjagar Construction Pvt. Ltd. VS Nayati Healthcare and Research NCR Pvt. Ltd.

 

Latest Legal News