Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Judicial Discretion Must Be Exercised Judiciously, Cautiously: Gujarat High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Lady Accused with Two-Month-Old Child

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment today, the Gujarat High Court granted anticipatory bail to Amanpreet Gurkamalsinh Kaur, a woman accused of multiple offences including those under the Indian Penal Code, the Explosives Act, and the Essential Commodities Act. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar stated, "It is equally incumbent upon the Court to exercise its discretion judiciously, cautiously, and strictly in compliance with the basic principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court."

The court took into account several factors before granting bail. Justice Suthar observed, "I have considered the following aspects: The applicant is a lady accused having a two-months-old child; day-to-day affairs of Noor Enterprise are being managed by the husband of the applicant; nothing is required to be recovered or discovered from the applicant; the applicant is ready and willing to join the investigation."

Counsel for the accused, Mr. ND Nanavaty, along with Mr. Ruchit J Vyas, argued that the applicant had not actively participated in any alleged criminal activities and was merely the proprietor of Noor Enterprise. She also has a two-month-old child, making custodial interrogation unnecessary.

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr. Hardik Mehta, vehemently opposed the bail application, stating that the accused was the proprietor of Noor Enterprise and thus responsible for its activities. He insisted on the necessity of custodial interrogation for effective investigation.

Despite the opposition, Justice Suthar granted bail on specific conditions, including a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 and presence at the concerned police station on specified dates. The judge also clarified, "Despite this order, it would be open for the Investigating Agency to apply to the competent Magistrate, for police remand of the applicant."

The decision references several cases, including the Apex Court's decisions in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra and Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi), as guidelines for granting anticipatory bail.

Legal analysts state that this decision once again underscores the importance of judicious and cautious use of judicial discretion in bail matters, particularly when it comes to vulnerable sections of society.

Date of Decision:29 September 2023

AMANPREET GURKAMALSINH KAUR vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Latest Legal News