Granting Bail Does Not Shield Foreign Nationals from Executive Action on Visa Violations: Delhi High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Misused to Resolve Substantive Disputes or Replace Execution Mechanisms: P&H High Court Eviction Proceedings Must Follow Principles of Natural Justice: Telangana High Court Quashes Eviction Order under Senior Citizens Act Limitation Law | Sufficient Cause Cannot Be Liberally Interpreted If Negligence or Inaction Is Apparent: Gujarat High Court Mere Pendency of Lease Renewal Requests Does Not Constitute Bona Fide Dispute: Calcutta High Court Upholds Eviction Proceedings Under Public Premises Act CGST | Declaratory Nature of Safari Retreats Ruling Mandates Reassessment of Input Tax Credit Claims: Kerala High Court Changing Rules of the Game Mid-Way Violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution: Rajasthan High Court Disapproval of a Relationship Does Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide Without Direct Instigation or Mens Rea: Supreme Court Limitation Period Under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act Cannot Defeat Victim’s Right to Compensation: Gujarat High Court Maintenance To Wife Cannot Be a Precondition for Bail: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 438 CrPC Court Cannot Rewrite Contract When Vendor Lacks Ownership of the Property: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance Royalty Can Be Levied on Minor Minerals Like Brick Earth, Irrespective of Land Ownership: Supreme Court Bail in Heinous Crimes Must Be Granted with Adequate Reasons and Judicial Scrutiny: Supreme Court Judicial Review in Disciplinary Cases Is Limited to Fairness, Not Reappreciation of Evidence: Supreme Court Prolonged Consensual Relationship Cannot Be Criminalized as Rape on False Promise of Marriage: Madras High Court No Interference in Judgments Without Perversity or Legal Error Under Section 100 CPC: Andhra Pradesh HC

J&K High Court Dismisses Appeal, Upholds SARFAESI Act’s Bar on Injunction, Cites ‘Abuse of Process’”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the High Court delivered a landmark judgment on July 21, 2023, dismissing an appeal and upholding the application of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act). The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, highlighted the court’s strict adherence to the principles of justice, equity, and the prevention of abuse of process.

The subject of the case was the grant of an interlocutory injunction sought by the appellant to restrain the bank from taking action under the SARFAESI Act. The Act empowers banks and financial institutions to recover their non-performing assets (NPAs) without recourse to civil courts, thus streamlining the recovery process. Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act prohibits the granting of injunctions against any action taken or to be taken under the Act.

Justice Nargal, in his judgment, emphasized the essence of the Act and its overriding effect on other laws. He stated, The opening portion of Section 34 clearly states that no civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which a DRT or an Appellate Tribunal is empowered by or under the Securitization Act to determine.”

The court also observed that the appellant had filed the suit with an ulterior motive and unclean hands. The plaintiff had previously attempted to challenge the mortgage deeds under the Act and failed to obtain relief. Subsequently, they filed the present suit with the intention to stall the bank’s efforts to recover the dues.

Justice Nargal cited the principles of equity, stating, “One who seeks equitable relief must do equity also and demonstrate bonafides.” The court further highlighted the need for parties to come to the court with clean hands, and those who base their case on falsehood have no right to approach the court.

The judgment also reaffirmed the discretionary nature of granting interlocutory injunctions. The court considered factors like prima facie case, balance of convenience, and the likelihood of irreparable injury while deciding whether to grant the injunction.

Date of Decision: 21st July 2023

Raj Kumar Gupta  vs Bank of India and anr. 

Similar News