Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

Jharkhand High Court Sets Aside State Circular on Registrar’s Power to Cancel Sale Deeds: Upholds Civil Court Authority

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Jharkhand High Court has set aside a controversial circular issued by the State Government of Jharkhand. This circular had conferred upon Registrars the power to cancel registered instruments, such as sale deeds, a move that has now been deemed legally unsustainable by the High Court.

The circular in question was aimed at addressing the rising instances of fraudulent registrations. However, the High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Gautam Kumar Choudhary, held that such powers rest exclusively with the civil courts. “The executive power of the State Government under Article 162 is coextensive with the legislative power of the State legislature. But, in the absence of any law, the State or its officers in the exercise of executive authority, cannot infringe citizen’s rights merely because legislature has power to make law on the subject,” the Court observed.

The judgment emphasizes that the cancellation of registered deeds is a significant legal action that cannot be performed by the Registrar post-registration. The Court noted, “There cannot be two views that existing provisions of the Registration Act, do not confer the Registrar with power to cancel a document which has been already registered.”

This landmark decision is expected to have far-reaching implications, particularly in how fraudulent registrations are addressed in the state. The Court also highlighted the potential for multiplicity of proceedings and judicial inefficiency if such powers were to be exercised by the Registrar. “To confer power of cancellation to the Registrar will open floodgates of litigation in such matters,” the judgment stated.

With the annulment of the impugned circular, all related cases, notices, orders passed under it, and consequent orders for the institution of FIRs have been set aside. The decision reasserts the authority of civil courts in matters concerning the cancellation of registered instruments and upholds the legal framework as defined by the Registration Act, 1908. The High Court’s ruling serves as a crucial reminder of the separation of powers and the specific roles of judicial and executive branches in the legal system.

Date of Decision: 11th January 2024                                                            

Vinod Shankar Jha @ Binod Shankar VS State of Jharkhand

 

Latest Legal News