Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Permissive Use Cannot Ripen into Right of Prescriptive Easement: Kerala High Court High Court Slams Procedural Delays, Orders FSL Report in Assault Case to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice Petitioner Did Not Endorse Part-Payments on Cheque; Section 138 NI Act Not Attracted: Madras High Court Minority Christian Schools Not Bound by Rules of 2018; Disciplinary Proceedings Can Continue: High Court of Calcutta Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Jharkhand High Court Sets Aside State Circular on Registrar’s Power to Cancel Sale Deeds: Upholds Civil Court Authority

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Jharkhand High Court has set aside a controversial circular issued by the State Government of Jharkhand. This circular had conferred upon Registrars the power to cancel registered instruments, such as sale deeds, a move that has now been deemed legally unsustainable by the High Court.

The circular in question was aimed at addressing the rising instances of fraudulent registrations. However, the High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Gautam Kumar Choudhary, held that such powers rest exclusively with the civil courts. “The executive power of the State Government under Article 162 is coextensive with the legislative power of the State legislature. But, in the absence of any law, the State or its officers in the exercise of executive authority, cannot infringe citizen’s rights merely because legislature has power to make law on the subject,” the Court observed.

The judgment emphasizes that the cancellation of registered deeds is a significant legal action that cannot be performed by the Registrar post-registration. The Court noted, “There cannot be two views that existing provisions of the Registration Act, do not confer the Registrar with power to cancel a document which has been already registered.”

This landmark decision is expected to have far-reaching implications, particularly in how fraudulent registrations are addressed in the state. The Court also highlighted the potential for multiplicity of proceedings and judicial inefficiency if such powers were to be exercised by the Registrar. “To confer power of cancellation to the Registrar will open floodgates of litigation in such matters,” the judgment stated.

With the annulment of the impugned circular, all related cases, notices, orders passed under it, and consequent orders for the institution of FIRs have been set aside. The decision reasserts the authority of civil courts in matters concerning the cancellation of registered instruments and upholds the legal framework as defined by the Registration Act, 1908. The High Court’s ruling serves as a crucial reminder of the separation of powers and the specific roles of judicial and executive branches in the legal system.

Date of Decision: 11th January 2024                                                            

Vinod Shankar Jha @ Binod Shankar VS State of Jharkhand

 

Similar News