MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Jharkhand High Court Discharges Accused in Rape Case -Consensual Relationship

04 September 2024 11:27 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Jharkhand, under the bench of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Subhash Chand, has discharged an accused in a case involving a consensual relationship. The accused had challenged the order rejecting his discharge application under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

The case revolved around the accused and the victim who were in a consensual relationship for several years. The victim was of major age at the time of the alleged incidents. The accused was accused of alluring her into establishing physical relations under the promise of marriage, after the victim had divorced her former husband.

Justice Subhash Chand observed, “The allegations indicate awareness of consequences, and the consent was not obtained under misconception. No sufficient ground exists to make out an offence under Section 376 IPC.” The court set aside the impugned order rejecting the discharge and discharged the accused.

This judgement highlights the importance of understanding the circumstances and context surrounding consensual relationships, and how the law should be applied in such cases.

The ruling takes into account previous cases as well, such as the judgement in Pramod Suryabhan Pawar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr., where the Supreme Court differentiated between false promises of marriage and breach of promise made in good faith.

This judgement contributes to the ongoing discourse about consent, awareness, and accountability within relationships, and serves as a reminder of the delicate balance required in such cases. 

Date of Decision: 30/08/2023

xxx vs xxx

Latest Legal News