Motor Insurance Policy Covers Cross-Border Travel If Specifically Authorized By Valid Permit Under MVA: Supreme Court Petrol Pumps Act As 'Commission Agents' For Mahanagar Gas, Liable To Pay Service Tax Under Business Auxiliary Service: Supreme Court Supreme Court Refuses To Dilute 'Bangalore Water Supply' Ratio, Affirms Worker Protection Remains The Core Of Industrial Disputes Act Order XXII Rule 9(3) CPC | Application Under Section 5 Limitation Act Must Be Filed Separately To Condonate Delay In Setting Aside Abatement: Supreme Court Principle Of Parity | Supreme Court Extends Benefit Of Fixed-Term Sentence To Co-Accused Based On Remission Period Right To Catch Fish Amounts To 'Profit à Prendre' And Is Compulsorily Registrable As A Lease Under Section 17(1)(d) Registration Act: Supreme Court Supreme Court Mandates Adoption Of Guidelines To Inculcate Sensitivity And Compassion In Judicial Processes For Sexual Offences 'Last Seen' Circumstance Is Weak Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused PSEB | Pre-Regularization Service Must Be Counted As Qualifying Service For Pensionary Benefits: Supreme Court Writ Of Quo Warranto Cannot Be Used For Redress Of Personal Grievances By Unsuccessful Candidates In Selection Process: Supreme Court 'Case Of No Investigation': Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused Citing 'Shoddy' Police Work And Lack Of Forensic Evidence 'Status Quo Cannot Be Vacated Without Appropriate Security': Supreme Court Directs Additional ₹200 Crores Deposit In RAKIA-Matrix Case SARFAESI Act | 'Bank' As Assignee Can Invoke Recovery Measures Even If Debt Was Originally Created By Non-Notified Financial Institution: Supreme Court 'CBI Failed Miserably': Supreme Court Tears Into 'Fabricated' Case, Acquits Bank Manager In 35-Year-Old Corruption Trial Mere Delay In Tax Deposit Cannot Be Equated With Non-Payment: Supreme Court Quashes Penalty On Saudi Arabian Airlines Revisional Power Under Section 56 Karnataka Land Revenue Act Cannot Be Invoked Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period: Supreme Court Prosecution Can’t Use Known Locations To Create 'Discovery' Fiction: Supreme Court Rejects Site Plan As Evidence Irretrievable Breakdown Of Marriage And Long-Term Separation Constitute Valid Grounds For Divorce Under Section 13(1)(ib) HMA: Supreme Court 'Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Is A Guideline And Not A Fetish': Supreme Court Acquits Man In 2007 Murder Case Over Fragile Circumstantial Evidence Plea Of Juvenility Is A Jurisdictional Fact; High Court Must Recall Final Judgments Under Section 482 CrPC To Remedy Miscarriage Of Justice: Supreme Court SEBI | Professional Clearing Members Have No Statutory Obligation To Verify Credit/Debit Positions Of Individual Clients Of Trading Members: Supreme Court

Jharkhand High Court Discharges Accused in Rape Case -Consensual Relationship

04 September 2024 11:27 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Jharkhand, under the bench of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Subhash Chand, has discharged an accused in a case involving a consensual relationship. The accused had challenged the order rejecting his discharge application under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

The case revolved around the accused and the victim who were in a consensual relationship for several years. The victim was of major age at the time of the alleged incidents. The accused was accused of alluring her into establishing physical relations under the promise of marriage, after the victim had divorced her former husband.

Justice Subhash Chand observed, “The allegations indicate awareness of consequences, and the consent was not obtained under misconception. No sufficient ground exists to make out an offence under Section 376 IPC.” The court set aside the impugned order rejecting the discharge and discharged the accused.

This judgement highlights the importance of understanding the circumstances and context surrounding consensual relationships, and how the law should be applied in such cases.

The ruling takes into account previous cases as well, such as the judgement in Pramod Suryabhan Pawar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr., where the Supreme Court differentiated between false promises of marriage and breach of promise made in good faith.

This judgement contributes to the ongoing discourse about consent, awareness, and accountability within relationships, and serves as a reminder of the delicate balance required in such cases. 

Date of Decision: 30/08/2023

xxx vs xxx

Latest Legal News