Granting Bail Does Not Shield Foreign Nationals from Executive Action on Visa Violations: Delhi High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Misused to Resolve Substantive Disputes or Replace Execution Mechanisms: P&H High Court Eviction Proceedings Must Follow Principles of Natural Justice: Telangana High Court Quashes Eviction Order under Senior Citizens Act Limitation Law | Sufficient Cause Cannot Be Liberally Interpreted If Negligence or Inaction Is Apparent: Gujarat High Court Mere Pendency of Lease Renewal Requests Does Not Constitute Bona Fide Dispute: Calcutta High Court Upholds Eviction Proceedings Under Public Premises Act CGST | Declaratory Nature of Safari Retreats Ruling Mandates Reassessment of Input Tax Credit Claims: Kerala High Court Changing Rules of the Game Mid-Way Violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution: Rajasthan High Court Disapproval of a Relationship Does Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide Without Direct Instigation or Mens Rea: Supreme Court Limitation Period Under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act Cannot Defeat Victim’s Right to Compensation: Gujarat High Court Maintenance To Wife Cannot Be a Precondition for Bail: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 438 CrPC Court Cannot Rewrite Contract When Vendor Lacks Ownership of the Property: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance Royalty Can Be Levied on Minor Minerals Like Brick Earth, Irrespective of Land Ownership: Supreme Court Bail in Heinous Crimes Must Be Granted with Adequate Reasons and Judicial Scrutiny: Supreme Court Judicial Review in Disciplinary Cases Is Limited to Fairness, Not Reappreciation of Evidence: Supreme Court Prolonged Consensual Relationship Cannot Be Criminalized as Rape on False Promise of Marriage: Madras High Court No Interference in Judgments Without Perversity or Legal Error Under Section 100 CPC: Andhra Pradesh HC

J&K High Court Quashes Disengagement Order of Special Police Officer; Orders Reinstatement

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu delivered a verdict quashing the disengagement order of a Special Police Officer (SPO). The judgment, rendered by a Division Bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Atul Sreedharan, has garnered attention for its emphasis on principles of natural justice.

The case titled "Sharaz Hussain Shah vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir and others” revolved around the disengagement of Sharaz Hussain Shah, who was employed as an SPO in 2013 by the respondents. The court found that the disengagement order was based on alleged links with bovine smugglers, and Shah challenged it in the writ petition SWP 2905/2016.

The judgment emphasized the Importance of conducting a proper enquiry as per Rule 359 of J&K Police Rules. The court noted, “The respondents themselves have admitted in the reply filed before the writ court that a departmental enquiry in conformity with Rule 359 was conducted, whereafter the petitioner was disengaged.”

Furthermore, the court rejected the respondents’ contention on delay and laches, stating, “In law, there is no specific period of limitation prescribed for approaching the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, and the court is loath to reject a petition under Article 226 simply on the ground of delay.”

High Court held that “the delay and laches had no application to the facts and circumstances of the case.” As a result, the court set aside the impugned judgment and directed the reinstatement of Shah as an SPO, while withholding the monetary benefits.

This ruling serves as a significant reminder of the importance of following due process and principles of natural justice when dealing with disengagement orders and disciplinary actions involving government employees.

“The respondents themselves have admitted in the reply filed before the writ court that a departmental enquiry in conformity with Rule 359 was conducted, whereafter the petitioner was disengaged.”

Date of Decision: 26th July 2023

Sharaz Hussain Shah vs State of J & K and others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Reserved_On__16_06_2023_vs_Through__Ms_Monika_Kohli_on_26_July_2023J^0K.pdf"]

Similar News