Marumakkathayam Law | Partition Is An Act By Which The Nature Of The Property Is Changed, Reflecting An Alteration In Ownership: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claim | Compensation Must Aim To Restore, As Far As Possible, What Has Been Irretrievably Lost: Supreme Court Awards Rs. 1.02 Crore Personal Criticism Of Judges Or Recording Findings On Their Conduct In Judgments Must Be Avoided: Supreme Court Efficiency In Arbitral Proceedings Is Integral To Effective Dispute Resolution. Courts Must Ensure That Arbitral Processes Reach Their Logical End: Supreme Court Onus Lies On The Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding A Will To The Satisfaction Of The Court: Calcutta High Court Deeds of Gift Not Governed by Section 22-B of Registration Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Testimony Of  Injured Witness Carries A Built-In Guarantee Of Truthfulness: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Murder POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Without Conclusive Proof Of Minority - Burden Lies On The Prosecution: Telangana High Court Credible Eyewitness Account, Supported By Forensic Corroboration, Creates An Unassailable Chain Of Proof That Withstands Scrutiny: Punjab and Haryana High Court Jammu & Kashmir High Court Grants Bail to Schizophrenic Mother Accused of Murdering Infant Son IT Act | Ambiguity in statutory notices undermines the principles of natural justice: Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act: Procedural Lapses Insufficient to Overturn Case Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Accused, Points to Possible Suicide Pact in "Tragic Love Affair" Tampering With Historical Documents To Support A Caste Claim Strikes At The Root Of Public Trust And Cannot Be Tolerated: Bombay High Court Offense Impacts Society as a Whole: Madras High Court Denies Bail in Cyber Harassment Case Custody disputes must be resolved in appropriate forums, and courts cannot intervene beyond legal frameworks in the guise of habeas corpus jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Insubordination Is A Contagious Malady In Any Employment And More So In Public Service : Karnataka High Court imposes Rs. 10,000 fine on Tribunal staff for frivolous petition A Show Cause Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction Cannot Withstand Judicial Scrutiny: AP High Court Sets Aside Rs. 75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand Timely Action is Key: P&H HC Upholds Lawful Retirement at 58 for Class-III Employees Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Applicable to Civil Court Orders: Patna High Court Uttarakhand High Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Acknowledges Cruelty Due to Prolonged Separation Prosecution Must Prove Common Object For An Unlawful Assembly - Conviction Cannot Rest On Assumptions: Telangana High Court

It is the petitioner's fundamental right to have her identity linked to her biological mother: Delhi High Court

16 October 2024 6:52 PM

By: sayum


Delhi High Court, in Shweta v. CBSE, granted the petitioner's request to amend her CBSE Class 10th certificate to reflect her biological mother's name, Santosh Kumari, instead of her stepmother's name. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma ruled that Shweta, who had been living with her biological mother since childhood, was entitled to have her identity correctly represented in official records. The Court acknowledged the emotional and personal significance of this change, emphasizing that it was the petitioner's fundamental right to be recognized as her biological mother's daughter.

Shweta's parents divorced when she was an infant, and she was raised by her father and stepmother. Her father's second wife was listed as her mother in her Class 10th records. As an adult, Shweta reconnected with her biological mother and sought to correct her educational documents to reflect her mother's name accurately. Despite her efforts, CBSE refused to make the changes, prompting her to file a writ petition.

The main issue was whether the petitioner had the right to correct her mother's name in her official records, despite the CBSE's opposition, which cited procedural regulations barring such amendments after the issuance of certificates.

Justice Sharma emphasized that the petitioner’s right to link her identity to her biological mother is a matter of personal dignity and fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The Court rejected CBSE’s arguments, stating that procedural rules could not override the petitioner’s legitimate request to correct her identity in official records.

"Courts must ensure justice is done beyond rigid legal frameworks to address unique and personal circumstances."

The Delhi High Court directed CBSE to correct Shweta's name from "Shweta Sangwan" to "Shweta" and to change her mother's name to "Santosh Kumari" in her Class 10th certificate within one month. However, the Court denied her request to remove her father’s surname, citing no valid basis for such a change.

Date of Decision: September 23, 2024

Shweta v. CBSE​.

Similar News