Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

Issuance, Renewal, or Re-Issuance Must Adhere to Section 6(2)(f) of the Passport Act: High Court of Karnataka Upholds Passport Denial in Criminal Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a noteable judgment, the High Court of Karnataka has upheld the decision of the Regional Passport Office to deny the issuance of a normal validity passport to an individual involved in ongoing criminal proceedings. The case, Shri B.R. Swamynathan v. Union of India & Others, became a focal point in interpreting the applicability of the Passports Act, 1967 in such scenarios.

The court meticulously reviewed the Act, especially Sections 2(e), 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, and 22, concluding that “issuance, renewal, or re-issuance of a passport must adhere to the stipulations of Section 6, particularly sub-section (2)(f).” This section restricts issuing passports to individuals with pending criminal cases, a significant point in the judgment.

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna, presiding over the case, also shed light on the Government of India's GSR 570 Notification. This notification allows for the issuance of short validity passports under specific conditions, including obtaining permission from the concerned court. The judgment states, “This is subject to specific conditions, such as the period of passport validity aligning with the court's order.”

This verdict takes into account various judicial interpretations and precedents, notably the Delhi High Court’s judgment in Ashok Khanna v. Central Bureau of Investigation and the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s ruling in Kadar Valli Shaik v. Union of India. The latter aligns with the stringent application of Section 6(2)(f) for renewal cases and was considered authoritative in this judgment.

High Court rejected the petitioner’s request for a regular, 10-year validity passport. Upholding the endorsement by the Regional Passport Office, the court advised the petitioner to seek a short validity passport from the concerned court, in compliance with the Act and GSR 570 Notification. The court clarified that the request for a short validity passport should not be denied solely based on the pending criminal case.

Date of Decision: 17th January, 2024

SHRI. B.R.SWAMYNATHAN  VS THE UNION OF INDIA

 

Latest Legal News