Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

Issuance, Renewal, or Re-Issuance Must Adhere to Section 6(2)(f) of the Passport Act: High Court of Karnataka Upholds Passport Denial in Criminal Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a noteable judgment, the High Court of Karnataka has upheld the decision of the Regional Passport Office to deny the issuance of a normal validity passport to an individual involved in ongoing criminal proceedings. The case, Shri B.R. Swamynathan v. Union of India & Others, became a focal point in interpreting the applicability of the Passports Act, 1967 in such scenarios.

The court meticulously reviewed the Act, especially Sections 2(e), 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, and 22, concluding that “issuance, renewal, or re-issuance of a passport must adhere to the stipulations of Section 6, particularly sub-section (2)(f).” This section restricts issuing passports to individuals with pending criminal cases, a significant point in the judgment.

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna, presiding over the case, also shed light on the Government of India's GSR 570 Notification. This notification allows for the issuance of short validity passports under specific conditions, including obtaining permission from the concerned court. The judgment states, “This is subject to specific conditions, such as the period of passport validity aligning with the court's order.”

This verdict takes into account various judicial interpretations and precedents, notably the Delhi High Court’s judgment in Ashok Khanna v. Central Bureau of Investigation and the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s ruling in Kadar Valli Shaik v. Union of India. The latter aligns with the stringent application of Section 6(2)(f) for renewal cases and was considered authoritative in this judgment.

High Court rejected the petitioner’s request for a regular, 10-year validity passport. Upholding the endorsement by the Regional Passport Office, the court advised the petitioner to seek a short validity passport from the concerned court, in compliance with the Act and GSR 570 Notification. The court clarified that the request for a short validity passport should not be denied solely based on the pending criminal case.

Date of Decision: 17th January, 2024

SHRI. B.R.SWAMYNATHAN  VS THE UNION OF INDIA

 

Latest Legal News