Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |     Punjab & Haryana HC Double Bench Upholds Protection for Married Partners in Live-In Relationships, Denies Same for Minors    |    

Irregularities and Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions: Allahabad High Court Quashes Conviction in NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Allahabad High Court has set aside the conviction of Lavkesh Singh and Pawan Kumar, appellants in a high-profile narcotics case. Justice Karunesh Singh Pawar, in his detailed judgment dated January 23, 2024, highlighted various lapses in the adherence to the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, leading to the quashing of the lower court's decision.

The appellants were previously convicted by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No.8, Lucknow, in Criminal Case No. 128 of 2010 under various sections of the NDPS Act for the offense of transporting narcotics.

Justice Pawar, in his observation, pointed out the non-compliance with Section 42 of the NDPS Act, which mandates the procedure for search and seizure. "There appears to be an absolute violation of section 42(2) of the 1985 Act," the judgment read, emphasizing the failure to obtain a search warrant and to send the recorded information to a superior officer within the stipulated 72-hour period.

The handling and custody of the seized narcotics also came under scrutiny. The judgment noted, "Violation of Section 55 of NDPS Act observed. Inadequate evidence regarding the safe custody and handling of the narcotics from the time of seizure to deposition in the malkhana (evidence storage)."

Further, the judgment underscored the absence of independent witnesses and insufficient link evidence in the case. "Two independent witnesses not produced in court, raising questions about the authenticity of the raid and seizure operations," the court observed.

One of the critical aspects of the judgment was the court's stance on the question of conscious possession. The judgment stated, "The issue of conscious possession, crucial in NDPS cases, was not sufficiently addressed during the trial, impacting the assessment of the appellants’ culpability."

Based on these observations, the High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction and sentencing imposed by the lower court. This judgment has once again brought to the fore the need for strict adherence to procedural norms and legal mandates in criminal cases, especially those dealing with narcotics.

Date of Decision: 23.1.2024

Lavkesh Singh And Pawan Kumar   VS Union Of India Thru.

 

Similar News