Married Daughter Cannot Be Excluded From Compassionate Appointment Solely On The Ground Of Marriage: Chhattisgarh High Court Allahabad HC Condemns Lawyers Seeking Adjournments To Attend District Courts Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Invoked For Restoration Of Possession When Statutory Remedy Of Restitution Exists: Calcutta High Court Invoke Preventive Detention Laws Against Sand Mining Kingpins: Supreme Court Directs ED Probe To Protect Chambal Sanctuary Res Judicata Bars Pendente Lite Purchaser From Re-Agitating Impleadment Under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC If Rejected Under Order I Rule 10: Supreme Court Consumer Complaints Can Continue Against Promoters & Co-Developers Even If Corporate Debtor Is Under IBC Moratorium: Supreme Court IBC Moratorium Protects Only Corporate Debtor, Does Not Bar Consumer Complaints Against Promoters & Directors: Supreme Court Vehicle Registration Certificate Relevant But Not Conclusive For Deciding Interim Custody Under Section 451 CrPC: Supreme Court Lawyer Has No Unqualified Right To Continuous Presence During Entire Interrogation Under Section 38 BNSS: Supreme Court Mandating Continuous Videography Of Accused During Transit Is Unworkable, May Lead To Unfounded Allegations: Supreme Court Centre Introduces FCRA Amendment Bill 2026: Proposes Vesting Of Defunct NGO Assets In 'Designated Authority', Mandates Prior Nod For Probe Written Communication Of Grounds Of Arrest Not Mandatory For Arrests Prior To SC's 'Mihir Rajesh Shah' Judgment: Orissa High Court Passing Ex-Parte Maintenance Order Without Verifying Status Of WhatsApp Or Email Notice Violates Natural Justice: Madhya Pradesh High Court Training ChatGPT On Copyrighted News Is 'Fair Dealing', Does Not Amount To Infringement: Delhi High Court Refuses To Enjoin OpenAI Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rethinking Access to Justice: Proposing a Client-Choice Bar-Integrated Model as a Viable Alternative to the LADC System Delhi Police Grants Permission To Advocates To Protest At Jantar Mantar On August 7 Over LADC Concerns Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Irregularities and Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions: Allahabad High Court Quashes Conviction in NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Allahabad High Court has set aside the conviction of Lavkesh Singh and Pawan Kumar, appellants in a high-profile narcotics case. Justice Karunesh Singh Pawar, in his detailed judgment dated January 23, 2024, highlighted various lapses in the adherence to the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, leading to the quashing of the lower court's decision.

The appellants were previously convicted by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No.8, Lucknow, in Criminal Case No. 128 of 2010 under various sections of the NDPS Act for the offense of transporting narcotics.

Justice Pawar, in his observation, pointed out the non-compliance with Section 42 of the NDPS Act, which mandates the procedure for search and seizure. "There appears to be an absolute violation of section 42(2) of the 1985 Act," the judgment read, emphasizing the failure to obtain a search warrant and to send the recorded information to a superior officer within the stipulated 72-hour period.

The handling and custody of the seized narcotics also came under scrutiny. The judgment noted, "Violation of Section 55 of NDPS Act observed. Inadequate evidence regarding the safe custody and handling of the narcotics from the time of seizure to deposition in the malkhana (evidence storage)."

Further, the judgment underscored the absence of independent witnesses and insufficient link evidence in the case. "Two independent witnesses not produced in court, raising questions about the authenticity of the raid and seizure operations," the court observed.

One of the critical aspects of the judgment was the court's stance on the question of conscious possession. The judgment stated, "The issue of conscious possession, crucial in NDPS cases, was not sufficiently addressed during the trial, impacting the assessment of the appellants’ culpability."

Based on these observations, the High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction and sentencing imposed by the lower court. This judgment has once again brought to the fore the need for strict adherence to procedural norms and legal mandates in criminal cases, especially those dealing with narcotics.

Date of Decision: 23.1.2024

Lavkesh Singh And Pawan Kumar   VS Union Of India Thru.

 

Latest Legal News