Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Irregularities and Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions: Allahabad High Court Quashes Conviction in NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Allahabad High Court has set aside the conviction of Lavkesh Singh and Pawan Kumar, appellants in a high-profile narcotics case. Justice Karunesh Singh Pawar, in his detailed judgment dated January 23, 2024, highlighted various lapses in the adherence to the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, leading to the quashing of the lower court's decision.

The appellants were previously convicted by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No.8, Lucknow, in Criminal Case No. 128 of 2010 under various sections of the NDPS Act for the offense of transporting narcotics.

Justice Pawar, in his observation, pointed out the non-compliance with Section 42 of the NDPS Act, which mandates the procedure for search and seizure. "There appears to be an absolute violation of section 42(2) of the 1985 Act," the judgment read, emphasizing the failure to obtain a search warrant and to send the recorded information to a superior officer within the stipulated 72-hour period.

The handling and custody of the seized narcotics also came under scrutiny. The judgment noted, "Violation of Section 55 of NDPS Act observed. Inadequate evidence regarding the safe custody and handling of the narcotics from the time of seizure to deposition in the malkhana (evidence storage)."

Further, the judgment underscored the absence of independent witnesses and insufficient link evidence in the case. "Two independent witnesses not produced in court, raising questions about the authenticity of the raid and seizure operations," the court observed.

One of the critical aspects of the judgment was the court's stance on the question of conscious possession. The judgment stated, "The issue of conscious possession, crucial in NDPS cases, was not sufficiently addressed during the trial, impacting the assessment of the appellants’ culpability."

Based on these observations, the High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction and sentencing imposed by the lower court. This judgment has once again brought to the fore the need for strict adherence to procedural norms and legal mandates in criminal cases, especially those dealing with narcotics.

Date of Decision: 23.1.2024

Lavkesh Singh And Pawan Kumar   VS Union Of India Thru.

 

Latest Legal News