Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Mere Entry, Abuse Or Assault Is Not Civil Contempt – Willfulness And Dispossession Must Be Clearly Proved: Bombay High Court Magistrate Cannot Shut Eyes To Final Report After Cognizance – Supplementary Report Must Be Judicially Considered Before Framing Charges: Allahabad High Court Examination-in-Chief Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction Amid Serious Doubts: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Cannot Reclaim Absolute Ownership After Letting Your Declaration Suit Fail: AP High Court Enforces Finality in Partition Appeal Death Due to Fat Embolism and Delayed Treatment Is Not Culpable Homicide: Orissa High Court Converts 30-Year-Old 304 Part-I Conviction to Grievous Hurt Fabricated Lease Cannot Be Sanctified by Consolidation Entry: Orissa High Court Dismisses 36-Year-Old Second Appeal Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization Sentence Cannot Be Reduced to Two Months for Four Life-Threatening Stab Wounds: Supreme Court Restores 3-Year RI in Attempt to Murder Case Suspicion, However Grave, Cannot Substitute Proof: Apex Court Reaffirms Limits of Section 106 IEA Accused at the Time of the Statement Was Not in the Custody of the Police - Discovery Statement Held Inadmissible Under Section 27: Supreme Court Failure to Explain What Happened After ‘Last Seen Together’ Becomes an Additional Link: Supreme Court Strengthens Section 106 Evidence Act Doctrine Suicide in a Pact Is Conditional Upon Mutual Participation — Survivor’s Resolve Reinforces the Act: Supreme Court Affirms Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Participation in Draw Does Not Cure Illegality: Supreme Court Rejects Estoppel in Arbitrary Flat Allotment Case Nepotism and Self-Aggrandizement Are Anathema to a Democratic System: Supreme Court Quashes Allotment of Super Deluxe Flats by Government Employees’ Welfare Society Liberty Is Not Absolute When It Becomes a Threat to Society: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Alleged ₹6.5 Crore Fraud Mastermind Magistrate’s Power Is Limited — Sessions Court May Yet Try the Case: Supreme Court Corrects High Court’s Misconception in ₹6.5 Crore Fraud Bail Order Dacoity Cannot Be Presumed, It Must Be Proved: Allahabad High Court Acquits Villagers After 43 Years, Citing ‘Glaring Lapses’ in Prosecution Case When the Judge Signs with the Prosecutor, Justice Is Already Compromised: MP High Court Quashes Tainted Medical College Enquiry Strict Rules Of Evidence Do Not Apply To Proceedings Before The Family Court: Kerala High Court Upholds Wife’s Claim For Gold And Money Commission Workers Cannot Claim Status of Civil Servants: Gujarat High Court Declines Regularization of Physically Challenged Case-Paper Operators Non-Wearing of Helmet Had a Direct Nexus with Fatal Head Injuries  : Madras High Court Upholds 25% Contributory Negligence for Helmet Violation Only a ‘Person Aggrieved’ Can Prosecute Defamation – Political Party Must Be Properly Represented: Karnataka High Court Quashes Case Against Rahul Gandhi

“Interest of Justice”: Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Attempt to Murder Case from 5 Years to 3 Years

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 4, 2023 – In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has reduced the sentence of Pramod Kumar Mishra, convicted under Section 307 IPC for attempt to murder, from 5 years to 3 years of rigorous imprisonment. The Bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol, delivered the decision today, emphasizing the “interest of justice” in the case.

The appeal was limited to the question of the quantum of the sentence imposed on the appellant, who had been convicted by the Trial Court and whose conviction was later upheld by the High Court of Allahabad. The Supreme Court observed that while sentencing, both “aggravating and mitigating circumstances” need to be considered.

The Court noted that 39 years have passed since the date of the offense and that there were no criminal antecedents of the appellant on record. “Therefore, in the interest of justice and in consideration of the abovementioned mitigating factors, this Court reduces the sentence,” the judgment read.

The appellant has also been ordered to pay a fine of Rs. 50,000 within a period of 6 weeks, which will go to the complainant as compensation. In default of payment, the appellant will undergo an additional 3 months of rigorous imprisonment.

The judgment also cited several previous cases to emphasize the principles and philosophies behind sentencing, stating that the Court has to “delicately balance the aggravating and mitigating factors and circumstances in which a crime has been committed.”

Legal experts view this judgment as significant, especially in the context of sentencing policies in India, which the Court noted are not yet statutory. The decision is expected to be cited in future cases involving similar circumstances.

The appeal has been partly allowed, and the appellant is directed to undergo the remaining period of his sentence.

Date of Decision:  04 September 2023

PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA vs THE STATE OF U.P.               

Latest Legal News