Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Insistence on OBC-NCL Certificate Within Arbitrary Timeframe is Unconstitutional - Delhi High Court Sets Aside AIIMS' Admission Cancellation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of admission of an OBC-NCL category candidate by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) due to late submission of the OBC-NCL certificate. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, presiding over the case, declared that the timeframe stipulated by AIIMS for the submission of OBC-NCL certificates was arbitrary and unconstitutional.

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, had his candidature cancelled by AIIMS for a postgraduate medical course. The reason cited was his failure to submit the OBC-NCL certificate within the timeframe stipulated in the AIIMS prospectus. Represented by Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, and Mr. Mrinal Kishor, the petitioner challenged this cancellation, arguing it lacked a rational nexus with the objective of reservation.

Justice Kaurav, in his ruling, noted, "The insistence by the respondent on the submission of the OBC-NCL certificate issued during the given cut-off date, is arbitrary and has no rational nexus with the object of reservation." He further emphasized the distinction between technical/academic qualifications and the OBC-NCL certificate, stating that the latter merely confirms an existing fact and should not nullify a candidate’s fundamental right to fair consideration under the reservation policy.

The court's decision underlines the importance of ensuring fair and rational criteria in the implementation of reservation policies. It highlights that administrative procedures should not become hurdles in realizing constitutional promises of equality and affirmative action.

The court directed AIIMS to accept the petitioner's fresh OBC-NCL certificate, dated 23.11.2023, and confirmed his admission which was previously granted under an interim order.

Date of Decision: 2nd February 2024

Ravi Kumar  VS All India Institute Of Medical Sciences 

Latest Legal News