MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |    

Insistence on OBC-NCL Certificate Within Arbitrary Timeframe is Unconstitutional - Delhi High Court Sets Aside AIIMS' Admission Cancellation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of admission of an OBC-NCL category candidate by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) due to late submission of the OBC-NCL certificate. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, presiding over the case, declared that the timeframe stipulated by AIIMS for the submission of OBC-NCL certificates was arbitrary and unconstitutional.

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, had his candidature cancelled by AIIMS for a postgraduate medical course. The reason cited was his failure to submit the OBC-NCL certificate within the timeframe stipulated in the AIIMS prospectus. Represented by Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, and Mr. Mrinal Kishor, the petitioner challenged this cancellation, arguing it lacked a rational nexus with the objective of reservation.

Justice Kaurav, in his ruling, noted, "The insistence by the respondent on the submission of the OBC-NCL certificate issued during the given cut-off date, is arbitrary and has no rational nexus with the object of reservation." He further emphasized the distinction between technical/academic qualifications and the OBC-NCL certificate, stating that the latter merely confirms an existing fact and should not nullify a candidate’s fundamental right to fair consideration under the reservation policy.

The court's decision underlines the importance of ensuring fair and rational criteria in the implementation of reservation policies. It highlights that administrative procedures should not become hurdles in realizing constitutional promises of equality and affirmative action.

The court directed AIIMS to accept the petitioner's fresh OBC-NCL certificate, dated 23.11.2023, and confirmed his admission which was previously granted under an interim order.

Date of Decision: 2nd February 2024

Ravi Kumar  VS All India Institute Of Medical Sciences 

Similar News