UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Insistence on OBC-NCL Certificate Within Arbitrary Timeframe is Unconstitutional - Delhi High Court Sets Aside AIIMS' Admission Cancellation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of admission of an OBC-NCL category candidate by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) due to late submission of the OBC-NCL certificate. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, presiding over the case, declared that the timeframe stipulated by AIIMS for the submission of OBC-NCL certificates was arbitrary and unconstitutional.

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, had his candidature cancelled by AIIMS for a postgraduate medical course. The reason cited was his failure to submit the OBC-NCL certificate within the timeframe stipulated in the AIIMS prospectus. Represented by Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, and Mr. Mrinal Kishor, the petitioner challenged this cancellation, arguing it lacked a rational nexus with the objective of reservation.

Justice Kaurav, in his ruling, noted, "The insistence by the respondent on the submission of the OBC-NCL certificate issued during the given cut-off date, is arbitrary and has no rational nexus with the object of reservation." He further emphasized the distinction between technical/academic qualifications and the OBC-NCL certificate, stating that the latter merely confirms an existing fact and should not nullify a candidate’s fundamental right to fair consideration under the reservation policy.

The court's decision underlines the importance of ensuring fair and rational criteria in the implementation of reservation policies. It highlights that administrative procedures should not become hurdles in realizing constitutional promises of equality and affirmative action.

The court directed AIIMS to accept the petitioner's fresh OBC-NCL certificate, dated 23.11.2023, and confirmed his admission which was previously granted under an interim order.

Date of Decision: 2nd February 2024

Ravi Kumar  VS All India Institute Of Medical Sciences 

Latest Legal News