Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Insistence on OBC-NCL Certificate Within Arbitrary Timeframe is Unconstitutional - Delhi High Court Sets Aside AIIMS' Admission Cancellation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of admission of an OBC-NCL category candidate by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) due to late submission of the OBC-NCL certificate. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, presiding over the case, declared that the timeframe stipulated by AIIMS for the submission of OBC-NCL certificates was arbitrary and unconstitutional.

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, had his candidature cancelled by AIIMS for a postgraduate medical course. The reason cited was his failure to submit the OBC-NCL certificate within the timeframe stipulated in the AIIMS prospectus. Represented by Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, and Mr. Mrinal Kishor, the petitioner challenged this cancellation, arguing it lacked a rational nexus with the objective of reservation.

Justice Kaurav, in his ruling, noted, "The insistence by the respondent on the submission of the OBC-NCL certificate issued during the given cut-off date, is arbitrary and has no rational nexus with the object of reservation." He further emphasized the distinction between technical/academic qualifications and the OBC-NCL certificate, stating that the latter merely confirms an existing fact and should not nullify a candidate’s fundamental right to fair consideration under the reservation policy.

The court's decision underlines the importance of ensuring fair and rational criteria in the implementation of reservation policies. It highlights that administrative procedures should not become hurdles in realizing constitutional promises of equality and affirmative action.

The court directed AIIMS to accept the petitioner's fresh OBC-NCL certificate, dated 23.11.2023, and confirmed his admission which was previously granted under an interim order.

Date of Decision: 2nd February 2024

Ravi Kumar  VS All India Institute Of Medical Sciences 

Latest Legal News