Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Use of ‘Absconding’ in Employment Context Not Defamatory Per Se, But A Privileged Communication Under Exception 7 of Section 499 IPC: Allahabad High Court Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Litigants Have No Right to Choose the Bench: Bombay High Court Rules Rule 3A Is Mandatory, Sends Writ to Kolhapur Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Grandfather in Rape Case, Citing Unnatural Conduct and Infirm Evidence Cheating and Forgery Taint Even Legal Funds: No Safe Haven in Law for Laundered Money: Bombay High Court Final Maintenance Is Not Bound by Interim Orders – Section 125 Determination Must Be Based on Real Evidence: Delhi High Court

Injunction Against Unauthorized Streaming of ICC World Cup Cricket Matches: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the High Court of Delhi has granted an injunction to restrain the unauthorized dissemination and broadcast of ICC World Cup cricket matches. The judgment, delivered on September 27, 2023, comes in response to a plea by Plaintiffs Star India Private Limited and Novi Digital Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., seeking protection against illegal streaming and communication of the prestigious sporting event.

The court observed, "Any injunction granted by a Court of law ought to be effective in nature," highlighting the urgency of protecting the rights of the content holders. It further stated, "The rights of IP holders cannot be rendered redundant in the virtual world, and the enforcement of rights on the internet has to be real and effective."

The Plaintiffs, who hold exclusive global media rights for various ICC events, expressed concerns that rogue websites could potentially undermine their rights and revenues by streaming the matches without authorization. The court found that the Plaintiffs had made a prima facie case for the grant of an injunction and noted the balance of convenience favored the Plaintiffs.

Under the judgment, Defendant Nos. 1 to 9, primarily rogue websites, are restrained from communicating, screening, or disseminating any part of the ICC World Cup Cricket matches on any electronic or digital platform. Domain Name Registrars have been directed to lock and suspend these rogue websites, while ISPs/Telephone Service Providers are ordered to block them. The Department of Telecommunications and Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology are also required to issue blocking orders for illegal streaming websites.

Recognizing the dynamic nature of online infringement, the court granted Plaintiffs the liberty to promptly inform authorities of any new rogue websites that may emerge during the event for immediate blocking. Non-infringing websites may approach the court for a modification of the injunction if they provide an undertaking not to engage in the unauthorized dissemination of ICC World Cup content.

The judgment reflects the evolving landscape of intellectual property protection in the digital age, emphasizing the need for swift and effective remedies to combat online piracy of sporting events and copyrighted content. The court's decision aligns with recent developments in intellectual property law and international recommendations for combating online piracy of live events.

This landmark judgment not only safeguards the interests of content holders but also sets a precedent for addressing digital piracy in real-time, ensuring that the rights of intellectual property owners are protected and enforced effectively in the virtual realm.

Representing Advocates, Mr. Sidharth Chopra and Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, played pivotal roles in presenting the case and securing this significant legal victory for the Plaintiffs.

Date of Decision: September 27, 2023

STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED  & ANR. vs JIOLIVE.TV & ORS.

Latest Legal News