Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Injunction Against Unauthorized Streaming of ICC World Cup Cricket Matches: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the High Court of Delhi has granted an injunction to restrain the unauthorized dissemination and broadcast of ICC World Cup cricket matches. The judgment, delivered on September 27, 2023, comes in response to a plea by Plaintiffs Star India Private Limited and Novi Digital Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., seeking protection against illegal streaming and communication of the prestigious sporting event.

The court observed, "Any injunction granted by a Court of law ought to be effective in nature," highlighting the urgency of protecting the rights of the content holders. It further stated, "The rights of IP holders cannot be rendered redundant in the virtual world, and the enforcement of rights on the internet has to be real and effective."

The Plaintiffs, who hold exclusive global media rights for various ICC events, expressed concerns that rogue websites could potentially undermine their rights and revenues by streaming the matches without authorization. The court found that the Plaintiffs had made a prima facie case for the grant of an injunction and noted the balance of convenience favored the Plaintiffs.

Under the judgment, Defendant Nos. 1 to 9, primarily rogue websites, are restrained from communicating, screening, or disseminating any part of the ICC World Cup Cricket matches on any electronic or digital platform. Domain Name Registrars have been directed to lock and suspend these rogue websites, while ISPs/Telephone Service Providers are ordered to block them. The Department of Telecommunications and Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology are also required to issue blocking orders for illegal streaming websites.

Recognizing the dynamic nature of online infringement, the court granted Plaintiffs the liberty to promptly inform authorities of any new rogue websites that may emerge during the event for immediate blocking. Non-infringing websites may approach the court for a modification of the injunction if they provide an undertaking not to engage in the unauthorized dissemination of ICC World Cup content.

The judgment reflects the evolving landscape of intellectual property protection in the digital age, emphasizing the need for swift and effective remedies to combat online piracy of sporting events and copyrighted content. The court's decision aligns with recent developments in intellectual property law and international recommendations for combating online piracy of live events.

This landmark judgment not only safeguards the interests of content holders but also sets a precedent for addressing digital piracy in real-time, ensuring that the rights of intellectual property owners are protected and enforced effectively in the virtual realm.

Representing Advocates, Mr. Sidharth Chopra and Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, played pivotal roles in presenting the case and securing this significant legal victory for the Plaintiffs.

Date of Decision: September 27, 2023

STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED  & ANR. vs JIOLIVE.TV & ORS.

Latest Legal News