Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Ingredients of Section 107 IPC Totally Absent: High Court Grants Bail in Suicide Abetment Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has granted bail to the petitioners in a case involving allegations of abetment to suicide. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari, while delivering the judgment on April 05, 2024, in the case of Balwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab, observed that "Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception," echoing the principles of personal liberty and presumption of innocence.

Legal Point of the Judgment: The judgment pertained to a bail petition under Sections 306, 506, 34, and 107 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) concerning allegations of abetment to suicide. The Court weighed the principles of personal liberty and the gravity of the offence in deciding to grant bail.

Facts and Issues: The FIR, based on a statement by Bhupinder Singh, accused the petitioners of harassing the deceased, leading him to suicide. The prosecution's argument centered around the recovery of a suicide note, whose authenticity was yet to be verified. The petitioners, arrested since February 7, 2024, argued for bail citing a compromise with the complainant and the absence of ingredients necessary under Section 107 IPC.

Justice Tiwari referenced various precedents, emphasizing the sanctity of personal liberty and the right to bail. The Court found merit in the petitioners' contention that essential elements under Section 107 IPC were missing. Additionally, the unresolved status of the suicide note's veracity and the likelihood of the complainant not supporting the prosecution were significant considerations. The Court, thus, deemed it appropriate to grant bail, stressing that bail should not be withheld as a form of punishment.

Decision: The petitioners were granted regular bail on the condition of furnishing a bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of the concerned magistrate. The Court clarified that future involvement in similar offenses might lead to the cancellation of bail. It was also made clear that the observations in this judgment were solely for deciding the present petition and should not influence the trial's merits.

Date of Decision: April 05, 2024

BALWINDER SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

 

Latest Legal News