Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Inclusion of B.Ed. as Qualification for Primary School Teachers Quashed Upheld By Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment today, quashing the inclusion of Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) as a qualification for primary school teachers. The bench, composed of esteemed justices, examined the constitutional validity of this policy decision and its impact on educational standards.

The court observed, "The inclusion of B.Ed. as a qualification for primary school teachers requires careful scrutiny to ensure pedagogical suitability and compliance with the Right to Education (RTE) Act. We must strike a balance between policy decisions and their constitutionality, keeping in mind the fundamental right to education."

The judgment addressed the judicial review of policy decisions, highlighting the importance of adhering to central government directives and the objectives of the RTE Act. The court emphasized the need to evaluate the arbitrariness or rationality of such decisions, while considering their implications on the availability of teachers with Diploma qualifications.

Legal experts note that this ruling will have far-reaching implications for the education sector and the appointment of primary school teachers across the country. The court's meticulous examination of the decision's rationale and its adherence to constitutional provisions underscore the significance of maintaining educational standards in line with the RTE Act.

This judgment sets a precedent for the evaluation of policy decisions affecting fundamental rights and emphasizes the role of judicial review in upholding constitutional principles. The court's verdict, quashing the inclusion of B.Ed. as a qualification for primary school teachers, reinforces the importance of careful consideration of pedagogical requirements and policy compliance in educational matters.

Education activists and legal scholars have welcomed the court's decision, noting that it upholds the integrity of the education system and ensures that policy decisions are in harmony with the broader goals of providing quality education to all.

Date of Decision: 11 August 2023 

DEVESH SHARMA vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.  

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/11-Aug-2023-Devesh.pdf"]

Latest Legal News