CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

In Motor Vehicle Accident Claims, the Insurance Company Must Pay the Award Amount First and Then Recover from the Vehicle Owner and Driver: Madhya Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

In a significant judgment concerning motor vehicle accident claims, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur, presided over by Hon'ble Shri Justice Amar Nath, has ruled on the contentious issue of the liability of insurance companies in accident claims. The court dealt with the appeals in Miscellaneous Appeal No.3096 of 2013 and No.2962 of 2013, involving appellants Smt. Prembai, Chammo Bai, and respondents Doulaltram, Ranjeet Singh, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

The case originated from a tragic accident on June 10, 2011, causing the death of Mangilal. His wife and daughter sought a compensation claim of Rs. 33,25,000. However, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 4,87,000 with an interest of 7.5% per annum, instructing the insurance company to pay this amount and then recover it from the vehicle owner and driver.

Legal Point: The primary legal issue revolved around the enhancement of compensation and the liability of the insurance company in case of policy breaches, such as the driver not possessing a valid license.

Enhanced Compensation: The Court, acknowledging the appellants' plea, enhanced the compensation by Rs. 80,000, citing the need for additional amounts under the heads of loss of spousal and parental consortium.

Insurance Company's Liability: Despite the insurance company's contention that the driver had an invalid license at the accident's time, the Court upheld the Tribunal's direction. It relied on precedents set by the Apex Court, emphasizing that insurance companies are initially liable to pay compensation. They can later recover the amount from the vehicle owner and driver. The judgment referenced several landmark decisions, including New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Kusum & Others and National Insurance Company Vs. Swarn Singh.

Pay and Recovery Order: The Court maintained that the insurance company must pay the enhanced compensation within 60 days, with 6% interest from the claim's filing date. The right to recover this amount from the vehicle's owner and driver was affirmed.

Decision: The appeal for enhanced compensation by the claimants was allowed, and the insurance company's appeal was dismissed. The company is directed to comply with the payment order, following which they are entitled to recover the amount from the vehicle owner and driver.

Date of Decision: 1st April 2024

Smt. Prembai & Anr. Vs. Doulaltram & Ors.

 

Latest Legal News