Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Use of ‘Absconding’ in Employment Context Not Defamatory Per Se, But A Privileged Communication Under Exception 7 of Section 499 IPC: Allahabad High Court Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Litigants Have No Right to Choose the Bench: Bombay High Court Rules Rule 3A Is Mandatory, Sends Writ to Kolhapur Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Grandfather in Rape Case, Citing Unnatural Conduct and Infirm Evidence Cheating and Forgery Taint Even Legal Funds: No Safe Haven in Law for Laundered Money: Bombay High Court Final Maintenance Is Not Bound by Interim Orders – Section 125 Determination Must Be Based on Real Evidence: Delhi High Court

Immediate Transfer of Child Custody: "Illegal Detention of Child Cannot Be Countenanced," Says Bench

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement, the High Court of Karnataka has passed a judgment in a habeas corpus petition, ordering the immediate transfer of custody of a minor child. The bench, comprising of Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde, emphasized that the illegal detention of a child cannot be tolerated.

The petitioner, Dr. Rajeev Giri, had filed the writ petition seeking the custody of his minor daughter, Mayra Giri. Despite a previous order by the Family Court appointing the petitioner as the guardian and directing the respondent, Dr. Ekta Singh, to hand over custody, the wife continued to retain custody in violation of the court's judgments.

Citing the importance of the best interests of the child, the bench stated, "A writ of Habeas Corpus is maintainable in child custody matters where one parent is unlawfully detaining the child." They further emphasized the court's inherent equitable powers and its role as parens patriae for the protection of minor wards.

Highlighting the finality of the custody order and the wife's non-compliance, the court noted, "Despite the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, the custody of the child has not been handed over to the petitioner who is legally entitled to the custody of the daughter. The wife's action amounts to abuse of the judicial process."

Consequently, the court issued directions to the Commissioner of Police, Bangalore, to ensure the immediate transfer of custody within 24 hours. Additionally, they instructed the police to contact the wife's employer, Manipal Health Enterprise Pvt. Ltd., and withhold benefits until custody is transferred. The court also ordered the initiation of suo motu criminal and civil contempt proceedings against the wife.

This judgment reinforces the court's commitment to protect the best interests of the child and uphold the sanctity of court orders in child custody matters. It sets a precedent for prompt action against those who unlawfully detain minors, emphasizing the importance of compliance with court judgments.

DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2023

RAJEEV GIRI  vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

Latest Legal News