Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Immediate Transfer of Child Custody: "Illegal Detention of Child Cannot Be Countenanced," Says Bench

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement, the High Court of Karnataka has passed a judgment in a habeas corpus petition, ordering the immediate transfer of custody of a minor child. The bench, comprising of Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde, emphasized that the illegal detention of a child cannot be tolerated.

The petitioner, Dr. Rajeev Giri, had filed the writ petition seeking the custody of his minor daughter, Mayra Giri. Despite a previous order by the Family Court appointing the petitioner as the guardian and directing the respondent, Dr. Ekta Singh, to hand over custody, the wife continued to retain custody in violation of the court's judgments.

Citing the importance of the best interests of the child, the bench stated, "A writ of Habeas Corpus is maintainable in child custody matters where one parent is unlawfully detaining the child." They further emphasized the court's inherent equitable powers and its role as parens patriae for the protection of minor wards.

Highlighting the finality of the custody order and the wife's non-compliance, the court noted, "Despite the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, the custody of the child has not been handed over to the petitioner who is legally entitled to the custody of the daughter. The wife's action amounts to abuse of the judicial process."

Consequently, the court issued directions to the Commissioner of Police, Bangalore, to ensure the immediate transfer of custody within 24 hours. Additionally, they instructed the police to contact the wife's employer, Manipal Health Enterprise Pvt. Ltd., and withhold benefits until custody is transferred. The court also ordered the initiation of suo motu criminal and civil contempt proceedings against the wife.

This judgment reinforces the court's commitment to protect the best interests of the child and uphold the sanctity of court orders in child custody matters. It sets a precedent for prompt action against those who unlawfully detain minors, emphasizing the importance of compliance with court judgments.

DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2023

RAJEEV GIRI  vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

Latest Legal News