Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Immediate Transfer of Child Custody: "Illegal Detention of Child Cannot Be Countenanced," Says Bench

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement, the High Court of Karnataka has passed a judgment in a habeas corpus petition, ordering the immediate transfer of custody of a minor child. The bench, comprising of Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde, emphasized that the illegal detention of a child cannot be tolerated.

The petitioner, Dr. Rajeev Giri, had filed the writ petition seeking the custody of his minor daughter, Mayra Giri. Despite a previous order by the Family Court appointing the petitioner as the guardian and directing the respondent, Dr. Ekta Singh, to hand over custody, the wife continued to retain custody in violation of the court's judgments.

Citing the importance of the best interests of the child, the bench stated, "A writ of Habeas Corpus is maintainable in child custody matters where one parent is unlawfully detaining the child." They further emphasized the court's inherent equitable powers and its role as parens patriae for the protection of minor wards.

Highlighting the finality of the custody order and the wife's non-compliance, the court noted, "Despite the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, the custody of the child has not been handed over to the petitioner who is legally entitled to the custody of the daughter. The wife's action amounts to abuse of the judicial process."

Consequently, the court issued directions to the Commissioner of Police, Bangalore, to ensure the immediate transfer of custody within 24 hours. Additionally, they instructed the police to contact the wife's employer, Manipal Health Enterprise Pvt. Ltd., and withhold benefits until custody is transferred. The court also ordered the initiation of suo motu criminal and civil contempt proceedings against the wife.

This judgment reinforces the court's commitment to protect the best interests of the child and uphold the sanctity of court orders in child custody matters. It sets a precedent for prompt action against those who unlawfully detain minors, emphasizing the importance of compliance with court judgments.

DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2023

RAJEEV GIRI  vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

Latest Legal News