Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization Article 21-A Cannot Be Held Hostage to Transfer Preferences: Allahabad High Court Upholds Teacher Redeployment to Enforce Pupil–Teacher Ratio Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Paying Tax Does Not Legalise Illegality: Bombay High Court Refuses to Shield Alleged Unauthorized Structure Beneficial Pension Scheme Cannot Be Defeated By Cut-Off Dates: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs EPFO To Follow Sunil Kumar B. Guidelines On Higher Pension Claims Equity Aids the Vigilant, Not Those Who Sleep Over Their Rights: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses to Revive 36-Year-Old Pay Parity Claim Students Cannot Be Penalised For Legislative Invalidity: Supreme Court Protects Degrees Granted Before 2005 Yash Pal Verdict Restructuring Without Fulfilment of Conditions Cannot Defeat Insolvency: Supreme Court Reaffirms Default as the Sole Trigger Under Section 7 IBC Section 100-A CPC Slams The Door On Intra-Court Appeals In RERA Matters”: Allahabad High Court Declares Special Appeal Not Maintainable Mental Distance Between ‘May Be’ and ‘Must Be’ Is Long: Patna High Court Acquits Six in Murder Case Built on Broken Chain of Circumstances Where Corruption Takes Roots, Rule of Law Is Replaced by Rule of Transaction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to DIG Harcharan Singh Bhullar Mere Voter List and Corrected SSC Certificate Cannot Prove Paternity: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects 21-Year-Old Bid for DNA Test in Partition Appeal Section 147 NI Act Makes Offence Compoundable At Any Stage: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Concurrent Convictions in Cheque Bounce Case After Settlement Bald Allegations of Adultery Based on Suspicion Cannot Dissolve a Marriage: Jharkhand High Court Once a Document Is Admitted in Evidence, Its Stamp Defect Cannot Be Reopened: Madras High Court

Immediate Transfer of Child Custody: "Illegal Detention of Child Cannot Be Countenanced," Says Bench

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement, the High Court of Karnataka has passed a judgment in a habeas corpus petition, ordering the immediate transfer of custody of a minor child. The bench, comprising of Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde, emphasized that the illegal detention of a child cannot be tolerated.

The petitioner, Dr. Rajeev Giri, had filed the writ petition seeking the custody of his minor daughter, Mayra Giri. Despite a previous order by the Family Court appointing the petitioner as the guardian and directing the respondent, Dr. Ekta Singh, to hand over custody, the wife continued to retain custody in violation of the court's judgments.

Citing the importance of the best interests of the child, the bench stated, "A writ of Habeas Corpus is maintainable in child custody matters where one parent is unlawfully detaining the child." They further emphasized the court's inherent equitable powers and its role as parens patriae for the protection of minor wards.

Highlighting the finality of the custody order and the wife's non-compliance, the court noted, "Despite the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, the custody of the child has not been handed over to the petitioner who is legally entitled to the custody of the daughter. The wife's action amounts to abuse of the judicial process."

Consequently, the court issued directions to the Commissioner of Police, Bangalore, to ensure the immediate transfer of custody within 24 hours. Additionally, they instructed the police to contact the wife's employer, Manipal Health Enterprise Pvt. Ltd., and withhold benefits until custody is transferred. The court also ordered the initiation of suo motu criminal and civil contempt proceedings against the wife.

This judgment reinforces the court's commitment to protect the best interests of the child and uphold the sanctity of court orders in child custody matters. It sets a precedent for prompt action against those who unlawfully detain minors, emphasizing the importance of compliance with court judgments.

DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2023

RAJEEV GIRI  vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

Latest Legal News