Triple Riding On Motorcycle Not Automatic Proof Of Contributory Negligence; High Court Can Enhance Award Even Without Cross-Appeal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Statutory Power To Lay Electricity Lines Prevails Over Private Land Claims; Landowners Entitled To Compensation, Not Obstruction: Bombay High Court Beer & Whisky Are Allied/Cognate Goods; Use Of Identical Mark For Spirits Infringes 'Godfather' Beer Trademark: Delhi High Court Minimum Percentile Fixed By Indian Nursing Council For B.Sc. Nursing Admissions Must Be Strictly Adhered To; Cannot Be Diluted Without Approval: Calcutta High Court Bride Not Expected To Keep All Gold In Personal Custody In Matrimonial Home; Entrustment To Husband Presumed: Kerala High Court Default Imprisonment Not Additional Punishment But Coercive Measure To Secure Fine; Cannot Become 'De Facto' Debtors' Prison: Karnataka High Court Mahant Is Only A Custodian Of Deity’s Property, Assets Gifted For Temple Maintenance Belong To Public Trust: Gujarat High Court Pendency Of Criminal Antecedents Alone Not A Ground To Deny Bail: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail In Abduction Case After 3-Year Delay In FIR Beer Falls Under ‘IMFL’ Category; No Obligation To Collect TCS On Sales Prior To June 2003: Telangana High Court Dismissal From Service For Negligence Without Proved Misappropriation Is Disproportionate: Orissa High Court Merit In A Case Does Not Justify Disregarding Statutory Delay: NCDRC Upholds Dismissal Of Star Health's Appeal Filed With 442-Day Delay Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) Arbitration Act Commences Only From Receipt Of Signed Copy Of Award: Madhya Pradesh High Court Government Employee Not Eligible For Regular Promotion During Pendency Of Vigilance Proceeding: Orissa High Court Arrest Warrants Against Directors Under Section 72 CP Act Should Be Last Resort; Proper Procedure Must Be Followed: NCDRC

Illegal Structures to Face Demolition: Bombay HC Directs Strict Action Against Unauthorized Constructions

22 November 2024 7:01 PM

By: sayum


Bombay High Court in a significant judgment addressed systemic lapses in Maharashtra's real estate sector, particularly the submission of forged documents for project registration under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA). The Court directed the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) and other state agencies to implement a more integrated and transparent verification process.

The judgment reflects on key statutory mandates under RERA, emphasizing accountability and transparency in real estate project approvals. It also provides a roadmap for stakeholders to address fraudulent practices that undermine homebuyers' trust.

"RERA's Role in Ensuring Verified Real Estate Practices Is Central to Consumer Protection"

The petitioner, an architect, alleged non-compliance with RERA provisions by developers in Kalyan and Ambernath Talukas, particularly the submission of forged commencement certificates. The plea highlighted approximately 27 villages affected by unauthorized constructions, urging the Court to direct the State and MahaRERA to adopt stringent verification measures for project approvals.

The Court examined several key legal questions:

The enforcement of Sections 3, 4, and 5 of the RERA Act, mandating developers to submit authenticated commencement certificates for registration.

MahaRERA’s powers under Sections 7 and 34 to revoke registrations and recommend systemic reforms.

The integration of local authority databases with MahaRERA to prevent fraudulent document submissions.

The Court underscored that RERA's primary objective is to safeguard homebuyers by ensuring the authenticity of project documentation. Section 4(2)(c) mandates authenticated commencement certificates, and Section 7 allows for revocation of registrations obtained fraudulently. MahaRERA’s recent revocations for 64 projects based on forged documents were noted as positive steps.

The Court directed the integration of municipal databases with MahaRERA's platform by March 2023 to allow real-time verification of certificates. It noted that 454 local bodies had commenced such integration, though 26 planning authorities were yet to comply.

The Court commended enforcement measures, such as demolitions and freezing of bank accounts linked to fraudulent projects. It directed authorities to complete demolitions of identified illegal structures within three months.

The Court refused to mandate a statewide re-scrutiny of all RERA registrations, citing the absence of prima facie evidence for widespread fraud. It stressed that petitioners must provide specific instances to warrant such investigations.

Mandatory Integration: Municipalities and MahaRERA must integrate their systems within three months.

Immediate Publication: Certificates must be uploaded online within 48 hours of issuance until integration is complete.

Verified Registrations: MahaRERA must verify all commencement certificates before approving new project registrations.

Demolition Enforcement: Authorities are to ensure timely removal of illegal structures with police assistance.

Monitoring Mechanisms: Regular compliance checks on the transparency measures mandated under RERA.

The judgment reiterates the judiciary's commitment to enforcing RERA’s consumer protection framework while holding developers and regulatory authorities accountable. By mandating integration and verification measures, the Court aims to enhance transparency and curb fraudulent practices in the real estate sector.

Date of Decision: November 19, 2024

Latest Legal News