Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Illegal Immigrants Can’t Be Held in Prisons After Sentence Ends: Supreme Court Rebukes West Bengal, Orders Bail for Long-Term Detainees

12 June 2025 3:43 PM

By: sayum


“Once sentence is served, even an illegal immigrant can’t be kept in prison — only in detention centres”, In a pivotal order passed by Supreme Court unequivocally held that “no person, whether a citizen or an illegal immigrant, can be kept in a prison after completing their sentence.” A Bench comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan directed the release on bail of foreign nationals detained in West Bengal prisons beyond three years of sentence completion, citing their continued incarceration as unjust and constitutionally impermissible.

The judgment, though ultimately tagged with a larger pending batch of cases, carved out immediate relief on humanitarian and constitutional grounds, drawing attention to the State’s failure to establish proper detention infrastructure.

The petitioners, including noted human rights activist Maja Daruwala, challenged the continued imprisonment of declared foreign nationals who had completed their sentences under the Foreigners Act, 1946. Specifically, they sought relief against Clause 4 of a West Bengal Government Memorandum dated 06.03.2007, which authorized continued detention pending deportation — even in regular prisons — of such individuals.

Despite having served their sentences, these foreign nationals remained incarcerated for years due to the absence of dedicated detention centres in West Bengal. The State had promised to construct such a facility, but completion was still pending.

Whether a foreign national can be held in a regular prison after serving sentence pending deportation?

The Court’s answer was a categorical no. It held:

“Once he is tried, sentenced and has undergone the sentence, he cannot be kept in a prison… he being an illegal immigrant has to be kept in a correctional home/detention centre in its true sense.”

The Court found the State’s failure to create a proper detention facility constitutionally untenable:

“Unfortunately, the State of West Bengal does not have a correctional home or a detention centre and in such circumstances, although an illegal immigrant has undergone the entire period of sentence, yet he is being detained in prison awaiting deportation.”

While deferring final adjudication and tagging the matter with Jaffar Ullah v. Union of India (W.P. No. 859/2013), a larger case pending before a three-judge Bench, the Court issued immediate directions:

“If there is any illegal immigrant as on date in any of the prisons within the State of West Bengal, who has undergone the entire sentence and is still confined in any of the prisons past three years from the date of completion of his/her original sentence, he/she be released on bail…”

Conditions for Bail:

  • Bond with two sureties of ₹1,00,000 each from Indian citizens.

  • Verifiable address of stay.

  • Biometric data and photographs to be recorded and stored.

  • Weekly reporting to designated police station.

  • Mandatory notification of change in address.

  • Quarterly reports to Foreigners Tribunal.

The Court further directed that the State must complete identification of such detainees within four weeks and implement the bail order accordingly.

“Let this exercise be completed within a period of four weeks from today… Once the list is prepared, our order should be given effect to.”

It also directed that, post-construction, all such persons must be moved to a proper detention centre.

Importantly, the Court made it clear:

“This order will not apply for the purpose of bail if any of these illegal immigrants are being prosecuted for any other offence.”

The Supreme Court’s directive represents a significant affirmation of the rule of law and the constitutional rights of all persons, regardless of their citizenship status. It reiterates the foundational principle that “punishment ends with the sentence — and detention without legal basis is unconstitutional.”

This order will now be considered along with the batch of related cases in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 859/2013 — Jaffar Ullah & Ors. v. Union of India, which deals with broader issues of illegal immigration, detention, and deportation in India.

Date of Decision: May 16, 2025

Latest Legal News