Marumakkathayam Law | Partition Is An Act By Which The Nature Of The Property Is Changed, Reflecting An Alteration In Ownership: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claim | Compensation Must Aim To Restore, As Far As Possible, What Has Been Irretrievably Lost: Supreme Court Awards Rs. 1.02 Crore Personal Criticism Of Judges Or Recording Findings On Their Conduct In Judgments Must Be Avoided: Supreme Court Efficiency In Arbitral Proceedings Is Integral To Effective Dispute Resolution. Courts Must Ensure That Arbitral Processes Reach Their Logical End: Supreme Court Onus Lies On The Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding A Will To The Satisfaction Of The Court: Calcutta High Court Deeds of Gift Not Governed by Section 22-B of Registration Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Testimony Of  Injured Witness Carries A Built-In Guarantee Of Truthfulness: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Murder POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Without Conclusive Proof Of Minority - Burden Lies On The Prosecution: Telangana High Court Credible Eyewitness Account, Supported By Forensic Corroboration, Creates An Unassailable Chain Of Proof That Withstands Scrutiny: Punjab and Haryana High Court Jammu & Kashmir High Court Grants Bail to Schizophrenic Mother Accused of Murdering Infant Son IT Act | Ambiguity in statutory notices undermines the principles of natural justice: Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act: Procedural Lapses Insufficient to Overturn Case Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Accused, Points to Possible Suicide Pact in "Tragic Love Affair" Tampering With Historical Documents To Support A Caste Claim Strikes At The Root Of Public Trust And Cannot Be Tolerated: Bombay High Court Offense Impacts Society as a Whole: Madras High Court Denies Bail in Cyber Harassment Case Custody disputes must be resolved in appropriate forums, and courts cannot intervene beyond legal frameworks in the guise of habeas corpus jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Insubordination Is A Contagious Malady In Any Employment And More So In Public Service : Karnataka High Court imposes Rs. 10,000 fine on Tribunal staff for frivolous petition A Show Cause Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction Cannot Withstand Judicial Scrutiny: AP High Court Sets Aside Rs. 75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand Timely Action is Key: P&H HC Upholds Lawful Retirement at 58 for Class-III Employees Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Applicable to Civil Court Orders: Patna High Court Uttarakhand High Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Acknowledges Cruelty Due to Prolonged Separation Prosecution Must Prove Common Object For An Unlawful Assembly - Conviction Cannot Rest On Assumptions: Telangana High Court

If the Property in Proximity to a Source of Heat in Ordinary Use is Damaged by the Excessive Heat Thrown Out, But is Not Actually Ignited, the Damage is Not Within the Fire Policy: NCDRC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), New Delhi, has reversed the State Commission of Karnataka’s order, which had partly allowed a claim under the insurance policy for loss in a tissue culture nursery due to air conditioner failure and consequent temperature rise.

Legal Issue: The legal crux of the appeal centered on the interpretation of policy terms regarding coverage of damage due to non-fire-related causes under a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy.

Case Facts: The appellant, National Insurance Co. Ltd., contested the State Commission’s decision that directed them to compensate Meghana (Bio-Tech) Tissue Culture Nursery for losses incurred due to equipment failure leading to a temperature increase in the growth room. The equipment failure was due to voltage fluctuation, not a fire, leading to substantial damage to the banana tissue cultures housed in the nursery.

Policy Interpretation: The court relied on the precedent set in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Novelty Palace, emphasizing that damage caused by heat without actual ignition is not covered under the policy terms. The loss was specifically due to the malfunction of an air conditioning unit, which did not constitute a ‘fire’ as per the policy’s clauses.

Proximate Cause Analysis: References were made to the Suraj Mal Ram Niwas Oil Mills (P) Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., underscoring the necessity of a strict interpretation of insurance contracts. The proximate cause of the loss was identified as voltage fluctuation, which is explicitly excluded under the policy’s terms.

Surveyor’s Report and Evidence Review: The surveyor’s report, which did not find evidence of a fire, played a crucial role. The court noted that any deviation from the surveyor’s findings should be backed by strong reasons, which were absent in this case.

Ambiguity in Policy Terms: The respondent argued that ambiguity should be resolved in favor of the insured, citing the protective scope of the Consumer Protection Act. However, the court found no such ambiguity in the policy terms applicable to this case.

Decision: The NCDRC set aside the order of the State Commission, stating that the damages claimed by the respondents did not fall within the risks covered by the insurance policy. The appeal by National Insurance Co. Ltd. Was allowed, emphasizing adherence to the literal terms of the policy.

Date of Decision: April 8, 2024.

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Meghana (Bio-Tech) Tissue Culture Nursery,

Similar News