Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court

If the Property in Proximity to a Source of Heat in Ordinary Use is Damaged by the Excessive Heat Thrown Out, But is Not Actually Ignited, the Damage is Not Within the Fire Policy: NCDRC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), New Delhi, has reversed the State Commission of Karnataka’s order, which had partly allowed a claim under the insurance policy for loss in a tissue culture nursery due to air conditioner failure and consequent temperature rise.

Legal Issue: The legal crux of the appeal centered on the interpretation of policy terms regarding coverage of damage due to non-fire-related causes under a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy.

Case Facts: The appellant, National Insurance Co. Ltd., contested the State Commission’s decision that directed them to compensate Meghana (Bio-Tech) Tissue Culture Nursery for losses incurred due to equipment failure leading to a temperature increase in the growth room. The equipment failure was due to voltage fluctuation, not a fire, leading to substantial damage to the banana tissue cultures housed in the nursery.

Policy Interpretation: The court relied on the precedent set in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Novelty Palace, emphasizing that damage caused by heat without actual ignition is not covered under the policy terms. The loss was specifically due to the malfunction of an air conditioning unit, which did not constitute a ‘fire’ as per the policy’s clauses.

Proximate Cause Analysis: References were made to the Suraj Mal Ram Niwas Oil Mills (P) Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., underscoring the necessity of a strict interpretation of insurance contracts. The proximate cause of the loss was identified as voltage fluctuation, which is explicitly excluded under the policy’s terms.

Surveyor’s Report and Evidence Review: The surveyor’s report, which did not find evidence of a fire, played a crucial role. The court noted that any deviation from the surveyor’s findings should be backed by strong reasons, which were absent in this case.

Ambiguity in Policy Terms: The respondent argued that ambiguity should be resolved in favor of the insured, citing the protective scope of the Consumer Protection Act. However, the court found no such ambiguity in the policy terms applicable to this case.

Decision: The NCDRC set aside the order of the State Commission, stating that the damages claimed by the respondents did not fall within the risks covered by the insurance policy. The appeal by National Insurance Co. Ltd. Was allowed, emphasizing adherence to the literal terms of the policy.

Date of Decision: April 8, 2024.

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Meghana (Bio-Tech) Tissue Culture Nursery,

Similar News