CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Holding Elections to Legislatures and Holding them According to Law are Both Matters of Paramount Importance - High Court of Andhra Pradesh

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Andhra Pradesh addressed the issue of deletion of names from electoral rolls in the Parchuru Assembly Constituency, considering the principles of natural justice and procedural compliance.

Brief on Legal Point: The Court examined whether the deletion of petitioners' names from the electoral rolls was in violation of natural justice and if due process was followed by the Electoral Registration Officer.

Facts and Issues Arising in Judgment: Petitioners, residents of Parchuru Assembly Constituency, challenged the deletion of their names from electoral rolls, alleging violations of natural justice and procedural irregularities. Respondents claimed due process was followed, and legal remedies were available to petitioners.

Court Assessment:

Principles of Natural Justice: The Court found procedural compliance by respondents, emphasizing that statutory appeal mechanisms are available and effective remedies for petitioners.

Compliance with Manual on Electoral Rolls, 2023: The Court noted arguments on non-adherence to the Manual by respondents but cited Supreme Court precedent, stating that instructions in the Manual do not equate to law, and non-compliance does not confer justiciable rights on petitioners.

Statutory Appeals as Efficacious Remedy: The Court opined that statutory appeals under the Representation of the People Act, 1950, are more appropriate for addressing grievances, rather than interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Relevance of Supreme Court Precedent: The Court referenced the Supreme Court's observations on the importance of adherence to electoral laws to maintain the sanctity and public confidence in elections.

Decision: The writ petitions were disposed of, directing petitioners to statutory appeals. Interim orders in specific petitions were vacated. W.P. No. 32986 of 2023 was considered separately for its distinct relief sought.

 

Date of Decision: 02 February 2024

Batchina Gouthami and others VS The Election Commission of India

 

Latest Legal News