IBC Moratorium Under Part III Does Not Shield Directors From Personal Criminal Liability In Cheque Bounce Cases U/S 138 NI: Supreme Court Section 138 NI Act Is Predominantly Criminal; IBC Moratorium Stays Recovery Of Compensation But Not Prosecution: Supreme Court Refers To 3-Judge Bench Bus Driver Not Negligent If Vehicle Moved Based On Conductor's Whistle; Not Expected To Look Back For Alighting Passengers: Supreme Court Compassionate Assistance Received By Widow Cannot Be Deducted To Negate Compensation Payable To Dependent Mother Ineligible For Such Benefit: Supreme Court Section 37 Jurisdiction Is A Narrowing Pyramid; Courts Should Not Reopen Settled Jurisdictional Issues: Supreme Court Arbitration Award Passed Without Court Leave During Pendency Of Suit Is Unenforceable Under 1940 Act: Supreme Court Notice In Mutation Proceedings Constitutes Constructive Notice Of Probate; Revocation Plea Barred By Limitation: Supreme Court Breach Of Position Limits Is A Regulatory Infraction, Not Automatic Market Fraud; Supreme Court Sets Aside Reliance RPL Disgorgement Order Mere Breach Of Position Limits Not 'Fraud' Under PFUTP Regulations Unless Manipulation Or Inducement Is Proven: Supreme Court SC Awards ₹11 Lakh Compensation To Convict For 24-Day Delay In Release; Says State Must 'Obey First, Appeal Later' Compensation For Village Fazalwas Land Acquisition No Longer Res Integra; Supreme Court Dismisses Enhancement Claim Citing Previous Precedent Uncommunicated Adverse Remarks Cannot Form Basis To Terminate Probationer; Violates Natural Justice: Supreme Court Employer Cannot Use 'Unsatisfactory Performance' As Guise To Bypass Disciplinary Inquiry For Misconduct: Supreme Court Statutory Body Cannot Act As Both Investigator And Judge; Adjudicatory Process Must Be Neutrally Conducted: Supreme Court Removal Of Mathadhipati Vitiated If Relied-Upon Documents Not Supplied; Service By Affixation On Seized Premises Is A Legal Absurdity: Supreme Court Serving Notice By Affixing It To Door Of Premises Already Seized By State Is A Legal Absurdity: Supreme Court Initiating Criminal Case After Final Settlement Of Loan Account Is An Abuse Of Process; Sanctity Of OTS Must Be Protected: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Under Sections 420 & 471 IPC Cannot Continue After Bank Loan Settlement Approved By DRT: Supreme Court RTE Act: Use Of 'Teacher' In Section 23 Shows Intent To Make TET Mandatory For In-Service Staff, Not Retrospective: Supreme Court Service Of Teachers Cannot Come At Cost Of Educational Future Of Children: Supreme Court Extends TET Deadline To 2028 Right To Know Biological Father Prevails Over Right To Privacy; DNA Test Can Be Ordered To Resolve Paternity: Supreme Court DNA | Child’s Right To Identity & Closure Outweighs Putative Father’s Right To Privacy In Paternity Disputes: Supreme Court Approver’s Testimony Doesn’t Require Corroboration Of Every Material Circumstance; Rule Of Prudence Requires Only Connecting Link To Accused: Supreme Court Conspirator Liable For All 'Reasonably Foreseeable' Crimes Committed By Others In Furtherance Of Conspiracy: Supreme Court Rent Enhancement Orders Under UP Rent Act Must Apply Retrospectively From Date Of Filing Application: Supreme Court High Court Can’t Enhance Rent Under Article 227 Based On Mere Statements Without Evidence; Power To Be Exercised Sparingly: Supreme Court Parrot Testimony | Verbatim Repetition Of Allegations In Child's Statement Indicates Tutoring; POCSO Complaint Filed As 'Counter-Blast' Liable To Be Quashed: Supreme Court Matrimonial Disputes Often Witness Vague POCSO Allegations To Settle Personal Scores: Supreme Court Quashes Case Against Husband & In-Laws

Holding Elections to Legislatures and Holding them According to Law are Both Matters of Paramount Importance - High Court of Andhra Pradesh

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Andhra Pradesh addressed the issue of deletion of names from electoral rolls in the Parchuru Assembly Constituency, considering the principles of natural justice and procedural compliance.

Brief on Legal Point: The Court examined whether the deletion of petitioners' names from the electoral rolls was in violation of natural justice and if due process was followed by the Electoral Registration Officer.

Facts and Issues Arising in Judgment: Petitioners, residents of Parchuru Assembly Constituency, challenged the deletion of their names from electoral rolls, alleging violations of natural justice and procedural irregularities. Respondents claimed due process was followed, and legal remedies were available to petitioners.

Court Assessment:

Principles of Natural Justice: The Court found procedural compliance by respondents, emphasizing that statutory appeal mechanisms are available and effective remedies for petitioners.

Compliance with Manual on Electoral Rolls, 2023: The Court noted arguments on non-adherence to the Manual by respondents but cited Supreme Court precedent, stating that instructions in the Manual do not equate to law, and non-compliance does not confer justiciable rights on petitioners.

Statutory Appeals as Efficacious Remedy: The Court opined that statutory appeals under the Representation of the People Act, 1950, are more appropriate for addressing grievances, rather than interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Relevance of Supreme Court Precedent: The Court referenced the Supreme Court's observations on the importance of adherence to electoral laws to maintain the sanctity and public confidence in elections.

Decision: The writ petitions were disposed of, directing petitioners to statutory appeals. Interim orders in specific petitions were vacated. W.P. No. 32986 of 2023 was considered separately for its distinct relief sought.

 

Date of Decision: 02 February 2024

Batchina Gouthami and others VS The Election Commission of India

 

Latest Legal News