State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 License Fee on Hoardings is Regulatory, Not Tax; GST Does Not Bar Municipal Levy: Bombay High Court Filing Forged Bank Statement to Mislead Court in Maintenance Case Is Prima Facie Offence Under Section 466 IPC: Allahabad High Court Upholds Summoning Marriage Cannot Be Perpetuated on Paper When Cohabitation Has Ceased for Decades: Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Grant Divorce Despite Wife’s Opposition Ownership of Trucks Does Not Mean Windfall Compensation: Supreme Court Slashes Inflated Motor Accident Award in Absence of Documentary Proof Concealment of Mortgage Is Fraud, Not a Technical Omission: Supreme Court Restores Refund Decree, Slams High Court’s Remand State Reorganization Does Not Automatically Convert Cooperative Societies into Multi-State Entities: Supreme Court Rejects Blanket Interpretation of Section 103 Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication

Holding Elections to Legislatures and Holding them According to Law are Both Matters of Paramount Importance - High Court of Andhra Pradesh

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Andhra Pradesh addressed the issue of deletion of names from electoral rolls in the Parchuru Assembly Constituency, considering the principles of natural justice and procedural compliance.

Brief on Legal Point: The Court examined whether the deletion of petitioners' names from the electoral rolls was in violation of natural justice and if due process was followed by the Electoral Registration Officer.

Facts and Issues Arising in Judgment: Petitioners, residents of Parchuru Assembly Constituency, challenged the deletion of their names from electoral rolls, alleging violations of natural justice and procedural irregularities. Respondents claimed due process was followed, and legal remedies were available to petitioners.

Court Assessment:

Principles of Natural Justice: The Court found procedural compliance by respondents, emphasizing that statutory appeal mechanisms are available and effective remedies for petitioners.

Compliance with Manual on Electoral Rolls, 2023: The Court noted arguments on non-adherence to the Manual by respondents but cited Supreme Court precedent, stating that instructions in the Manual do not equate to law, and non-compliance does not confer justiciable rights on petitioners.

Statutory Appeals as Efficacious Remedy: The Court opined that statutory appeals under the Representation of the People Act, 1950, are more appropriate for addressing grievances, rather than interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Relevance of Supreme Court Precedent: The Court referenced the Supreme Court's observations on the importance of adherence to electoral laws to maintain the sanctity and public confidence in elections.

Decision: The writ petitions were disposed of, directing petitioners to statutory appeals. Interim orders in specific petitions were vacated. W.P. No. 32986 of 2023 was considered separately for its distinct relief sought.

 

Date of Decision: 02 February 2024

Batchina Gouthami and others VS The Election Commission of India

 

Latest Legal News